Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Vitalant

Unite blood and biologics donors, talent, and innovation to save and improve lives.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$8.6MReligion$168kEducation$56kRecreation & Sports$16kFood & Nutrition$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$8k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $94k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.5M
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$891M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIV OF PITTSBURGH-DEPT OF MEDICINE$1,500,000
AABB$75,000
UNM FOUNDATION$41,790
FLIGHTS FOR LIFE$25,000
BLOOD CENTER FDN OF THE INLAND NW$16,809
FOOTHILLS FOOD BANK$10,000
SIERRA SACRAMENTO VALLEY MED SOC$9,422
HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH FDN$8,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 32% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HonorHealth: $8k → 11%SIERRA SACRAMENTO VALLEY MED SOC: $8k → 12%GULF COAST REGIONAL BLOOD CENTER: $8k → 16%PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $25k → 14%PROVIDENCE HEALTH CARE FDN E WASH: $28k → 12%HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH FDN: $8k → 8%AABB: $160k → 8%HONORHEALTH: $8k → 11%SIERRA SACRAMENTO VALLEY MED SOC: $7k → 12%BLOOD CENTER FDN OF THE INLAND NW: $155k → 12%AABB: $75k → 8%PHOENIX CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%AABB: $75k → 8%PHOENIX CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%NAT BLOOD FDN RES & EDUC TRUST: $75k → 8%FOOTHILLS FOOD BANK: $10k → 11%NATIONAL BLOOD FDN RESEARCH & EDUC TRUST FD: $75k → 8%AABB: $75k → 8%AABB: $50k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
PA
NJ
CA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.8M · 10 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$8.8M
$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
-2%

Still filing today

60%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    5× · 2020–2024 · $7.5M · revenue +26%
  • AA
    American Association of Blood Banks
    6× · 2017–2024 · $510k · revenue +2%
  • TB
    The Blood Center Foundation of the Inland Northwest
    2× · 2022–2024 · $172k · revenue +59% · 43% of their budget

Funded once

  • UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $31k · revenue -18%
  • PI
    PROVIDENCE INLAND NORTHWEST FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $28k · revenue -2%
  • PV
    PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -34%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
2
Vitalant

Unite blood and biologics donors, talent, and innovation to save and improve lives.

Health
3
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

5
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
6
Uvmc Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at upper valley medical center by raising community support for programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Philanthropy
7
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

8
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
9
Institute for Systems Biology

Non-profit research institute to advance a systems (or holistic and cross-disciplinary) approach to science; personalized medicine; global health & environmental sustainability; science education; & the pioneering & invention of biological…

Science & Tech
10
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

11
Children's Hospital Pathology Foundation Inc

The Foundation's mission is to provide pathology services primarily to patients at Boston Children's Hospital and at satellite locations. The Foundation carries on and promotes basic and applied medical research and education in the field…

Health
12
Children's Hospital Ophthalmology Foundation Inc

The Foundation's mission is to provide ophthalmology services primarily to patients at Boston Children's Hospital and at satellite locations. The Foundation carries on and promotes basic and applied medical research and education in the…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gulf Coast Regional Blood Center and the most unlike its peers is Paralyzed Veterans of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $7,500,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH+2 more — $56,490 · EducationAmerican Association of Blood Banks — $509,500 · HealthAmerican …The Blood Center Foundation of the Inland Northwest — $171,968 · HealthThe Blood…PROVIDENCE INLAND NORTHWEST FOUNDATION — $28,059 · Health+4 more — $68,773 · Health+4 moreFLIGHTS FOR LIFE INC — $192,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO — $168,405 · OtherNATIONAL BLOOD FOUNDATION RESEARCH AND EDUCATION TRUST FUND — $150,000 · Other+2 more — $26,000 · Other
Education$7,556,490Health$778,300Other$536,405

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $7,500,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Association of Blood Banks — $509,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetThe Blood Center Foundation of the Inland Northwest — $171,968 over 2y, 43% of budgetNATIONAL BLOOD FOUNDATION RESEARCH AND EDUCATION TRUST FUND — $150,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC — $31,103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE INLAND NORTHWEST FOUNDATION — $28,059 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICE EDUCATION & RESEARCH FUND OF THE SEDMS — $25,387 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHONORHEALTH FOUNDATION — $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFoothills Food Bank — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGULF COAST REGIONAL BLOOD CENTER — $7,773 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Vitalant funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 9%
  • American Association of Blood Banks9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph