Skip to content

· Public charity

Vishal Raju Bhagat Foundation

Raise funds for diebeties research & non profit entities

$192k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$307kRecreation & Sports$160kHuman Services$135kInternational$25kReligion$22kFood & Nutrition$20kArts & Culture$10kPhilanthropy$9k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $125,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $192,300 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $67,300 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RONALD MCDONAL HOUSE$50,000
SUGAR FREE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION$15,000
CHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION$10,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOC$10,000
SPOHN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION$10,000
IT'S 4 THE KIDS$10,000
THE MIRACLE FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 48% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%SHREE RAMKABIR BHAKTA SAMAJ: $16k → 14%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%SUGAR FREE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%AMERICAN HEART ASSOC: $10k → 14%SOUTH TEXAS HINDU SOCIETY: $6k → 17%IT'S 4 THE KIDS: $10k → 8%SHARE & CARE FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%AMERICAN DIABETIES ASSOC: $10k → 9%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%SUGAR FREE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%AMERICAN HEART ASSOC: $9k → 14%RONALD MCDONAL HOUSE: $50k → 17%IT'S 4 THE KIDS: $10k → 8%AMERICAN DIABETIES ASSOC: $10k → 9%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%SUGAR FREE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%CORPUS CHRISTI CVB HERITAGE SOCIETY: $10k → 17%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%SUGAR FREE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%COASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9k → 17%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%SUGAR FREE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%SPOHN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%SUGAR FREE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%SPOHN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%SUGAR FREE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%SPOHN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%THE MIRACLE FOUNDATION: $28k → 10%SPOHN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%THE MIRACLE FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%CHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%THE MIRACLE FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%SPOHN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%THE MIRACLE FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%SPOHN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%THE MIRACLE FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%SPOHN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%THE MIRACLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$462k · 7 repeat orgs$217k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$462k
$157k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+27%

Still filing today

86%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MIRACLE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $138k · revenue +103%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    8× · 2017–2024 · $90k · revenue +49%
  • CS
    Christus Spohn Health System Corporation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI
    2× · 2017–2018 · $75k
  • SA
    SHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIAgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +27%
  • CO
    City of Kingsville
    2× · 2017–2018 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
4
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
5
Diabetes Technology Society

To facilitate research into the treatment, monitoring, diagnosis and prevention of diabetes.

Health
6
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
7
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
8
The Heart Foundation

The heart foundation (thf) was created to save lives from heart disease by increasing awareness, educating the public, and supporting innovative research at smidt heart institute at cedars-sinai medical center in los angeles, california.…

Philanthropy
9
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
10
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
11
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
12
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald McDonald House Global; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MIRACLE FOUNDATION INC: $138,000 · HealthTHE MIRACLE FOUNDATION INCBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $90,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1DChristus Spohn Health System Corporation: $70,000 · HealthChristus Spohn Health System CorporationRonald McDonald House Global: $50,000 · HealthRonald McDonald House GlobalAmerican Diabetes Association: $20,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $19,000 · HealthSUGAR FREE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $105,000 · OtherSUGAR FREE ATHLETIC FOUNDATIONCITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI: $75,000 · OtherCITY OF CORPUS CHRISTICity of Kingsville: $25,000 · OtherCity of KingsvilleSHREE RAMKABIR BHAKTA SAMAJ OF USA: $16,000 · OtherSHREE RAMKABIR BHAKTA SAMAJ OF USACHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $5,500 · OtherSHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA: $25,000 · InternationalFOR THE KIDS ORG: $20,000 · Food & NutritionVISIT CORPUS CHRISTI FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCOASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9,250 · Philanthropy
Health$387,000Other$236,500International$25,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Philanthropy$19,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MIRACLE FOUNDATION INC: $138,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $90,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChristus Spohn Health System Corporation: $70,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOR THE KIDS ORG: $20,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHREE RAMKABIR BHAKTA SAMAJ OF USA: $16,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetVISIT CORPUS CHRISTI FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetCOASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MIRACLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds Christus Spohn Health System Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
  • Who funds SHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds FOR THE KIDS ORG ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHREE RAMKABIR BHAKTA SAMAJ OF USA ↗
  • Who funds VISIT CORPUS CHRISTI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vishal Raju Bhagat Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vishal Raju Bhagat Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Vishal Raju Bhagat Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Vishal Raju Bhagat Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vishal Raju Bhagat’s filings →

    More from the funding graph