· Public charity
Virginia Mason Medical Center
VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER's (the medical center) mission is to improve the health and well-being of the patients it services through the delivery of high quality, cost-effective care.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $61k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+1 grant · $10M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BENAROYA RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT VIRGINIA MASON | $10,155,020 |
| PUBLIC HEALTH - SEATTLE & KING COUNTY | $150,226 |
| FREEDOM PROJECT | $138,405 |
| BACKPACK BRIGADE | $126,405 |
| LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NORTHWEST | $114,833 |
| ROOTS YOUNG ADULT SHELTER | $100,000 |
| HEPATITIS EDUCATION PROJECT | $99,371 |
| MARY'S PLACE SEATTLE | $86,900 |
| RAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK | $59,510 |
| SOLID GROUND WASHINGTON | $57,695 |
| HUNGER INTERVENTION PROGRAM | $50,000 |
| FARESTART | $50,000 |
| NASHI IMMIGRANTS HEALTH BOARD | $50,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $34,000 |
| COCOON HOUSE | $17,318 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $655k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
27 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $515k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BRBENAROYA RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT VIRGINIA9× · 2017–2025 · $49M · revenue +20%
- PAProject Access Northwest6× · 2017–2024 · $490k · revenue +36%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc4× · 2017–2020 · $263k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- SBSTEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTERone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
- NPNourish Pierce Countyone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue -58%
- KIKITSAP IMMIGRANT ASSISTANCE CENTERone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve the health of the public.
We champion the central role of architects in creating and sustaining a better built environment.
To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.
NoHLA works toward achieving a health care system in which all individuals receive quality, affordable health care, provided on an equitable and timely basis, and are assured of basic rights and protections. NoHLA conducts outreach,…
Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility engages the community to create a healthy, just, peaceful and sustainable world. We take on the gravest current threats to human health and survival -- nuclear weapons, economic inequity, and…
Healthpoint strengthens communities and improves people's health by delivering quality services, breaking down barriers and providing access to all.
To improve the health and well-being of each person we serve.
The organization is a community-based, non-profit agency that operates 31 medical, dental, and school-based health centers throughout seattle and provides services to over 57,008 people each year. our clinics are located throughout areas…
To provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.
We are dedicated to improving our patients' health by providing safe, high-quality care in a compassionate and cost-effective manner.
Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Children's Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Robert Vasen Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BENAROYA RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA MASON HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds Project Access Northwest ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH CARE IMPROVEMENT ↗
- Who funds MARY'S PLACE SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds ROOTS YOUNG ADULT SHELTER ↗
- Who funds Solid Ground Washington ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM PROJECT ↗
- Who funds BACKPACK BRIGADE ↗
- Who funds Lutheran Community Services Northwest ↗
- Who funds RAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Seattle Center Foundation ↗
- Who funds STEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds Nourish Pierce County ↗
- Who funds KITSAP IMMIGRANT ASSISTANCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds FARESTART ↗
- Who funds HEPATITUS EDUCATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SEATTLE-KING COUNTY-SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Hunger Intervention Program ↗
- Who funds Nashi Immigrants Health Board ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS ↗
- Who funds TEEN FEED ↗
- Who funds RUSSELL WILSON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Western Washington & Alaska ↗
- Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Girls on the Run Puget Sound ↗
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES ↗
- Who funds PRIDEFEST PRIDE FEST ↗
- Who funds SNO-KING AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of Lake Sammamish State Park ↗
- Who funds COCOON HOUSE ↗
- Who funds HIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · United Way of King County · Swedish Health Services · Wilkins Charitable Foundation · Gates Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Glassybaby White Light Fund · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Seattle Children's Hospital · Employees Community Fund of Boeing-Puget Sound
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Virginia Mason Medical Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.