Skip to content

· Public charity

Virginia Innovation Partnership Corporation

Vipc grows and diversifies virginia's economy by investing in and accelerating innovation commercialization and entrepreneurship.

$5.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
62
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$990k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Science & Tech$27MHealth$2.5MCommunity Improvement$1.2MEnvironment$440kFood & Nutrition$210kHousing & Shelter$150kEducation$149kEmployment$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 62 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k26 grants · $655k
  • $50k–250k33 grants · $3.0M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.7M
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$93M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF UVA$990,000
VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY$370,000
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY$300,000
WIRELESS RESEARCH CENTER OF NC$200,000
CHARLOTTESVILLE BIO HUB$200,000
STARTWHEEL CORPORATION DBA INNOVATE HAMPTON ROADS$200,000
STARTUP VIRGINIA INC$200,000
ROANOKE-BLACKSBURG INNOVATION ALLIANCE DBA RAMP$200,000
VA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY$196,330
Individual grant recipient$100,000
OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION$100,000
LIGHTHOUSE LABS RVA INC$100,000
VENTURE CENTRAL INC$98,000
JEANA BOLANOS DBA LANBO LLC$95,000
THE ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 73% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%WIRELESS RESEARCH CENTER OF NC: $200k → 8%VYBE ENERGY LLC: $100k → 4%UPBRAINS AI INC: $100k → 6%GPX LLC: $100k → 6%KNONAP LLC: $100k → 7%COEURATIVE INC: $100k → 8%CARGOLABS INC: $100k → 8%BABYLON MICROFARMS INC: $135k → 9%STARTWHEEL CORPORATION DBA INNOVATE HAMPTON ROADS: $200k → 10%ACCESSVR LLC: $100k → 16%VIRGINIA TECH: $681k → 21%VCU INTELL PROP FOUNDATION: $250k → 22%JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $112k → 29%VENTURE CENTRAL INC FKA GREATER CHARLOTTESVILLE ARE DEV CORP: $100k → 8%757 ACCELERATE INC: $100k → 19%VIRGINIA TECH: $581k → 21%ACTIVATION CAPITAL: $200k → 22%WELFORE HEALTH LLC: $100k → 19%VA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY: $230k → 21%MERU BIOTECHNOLOGIES: $135k → 22%757 ACCELERATE INC: $100k → 19%VA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY: $196k → 21%VIRGINIA TECH: $195k → 21%GENLOGS CORPORATION: $120k → 7%THE ROANOKE-BLACKSBURG INNOVATION NETWORK DBA VERGE: $200k → 21%OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY: $987k → 19%ROANOKE-BLACKSBURG INNOVATION ALLIANCE DBA RAMP: $200k → 21%NSMART INC: $120k → 4%VALLEYS INNOVATION COUNCIL: $200k → 21%LI INDUSTRIES INC: $135k → 21%CHARLOTTESVILLE BIO HUB: $200k → 8%STARTUP VIRGINIA INC: $200k → 9%STARTUP VIRGINIA INC: $150k → 9%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $955k → 22%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $370k → 22%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $270k → 22%VCU: $225k → 22%THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF UVA: $1.8M → 8%THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF UVA: $990k → 8%THE UVA PATENT FOUNDATION DBA UVA LICENSING & VENTURES GROUP: $250k → 8%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $300k → 6%CHARLOTTESVILLE BIO HUB: $200k → 8%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $195k → 6%FEDERAL FOUNDRY LLC: $133k → 7%AGROSPHERES INC: $135k → 8%ONCLAVE NETWORKS INC: $135k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $413k → 8%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $180k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$22M · 116 repeat orgs$10M to everyone else

116 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 92 since wound down; 38 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

116
135

Total granted

$22M
$8.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+41%

Still filing today

9%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementEducationScience & TechHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OD
    OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +89%
  • RB
    ROANOKE BLACKSBURG INNOVATION NETWORK
    4× · 2021–2025 · $700k · revenue +59%
  • CB
    CHARLOTTESVILLE BIOHUB
    4× · 2022–2025 · $600k · revenue +147% · 28% of their budget

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA PATENT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $250k · revenue +14%
  • VC
    VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +41%
  • HC
    HANOVER COUNTY CLEAN TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $200k · revenue ×49
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vcu Investment Management Company

To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…

Education
2
Virginia Tech Applied Research Corporation

The mission of vt-arc is to extend the impact of the virginia tech research and innovation enterprise, delivering superior analytic and technology solutions to government and non-government customers.

Science & Tech
3
Southside Business Technology Center Inc (Dba the Launch Place)

The launch place (tlp), a venture development organization located in danville, va and in the research triangle park, nc. the launch place invests in innovative start-ups in virginia and north carolina with a potential to create economic…

Community Improvement
4
Northern Virginia Technology Council Inc

The mission of the northern virginia technology council (nvtc) is to accelerate tech innovation and promote a world class workforce. nvtc connects, educates, advocates and celebrates the region's thriving tech ecosystem.

—
5
Vermont Center for Emerging Technologies Inc

Vcet's purpose is to accelerate innovation and entrepreneurship across vermont. this is accomplished by providing expert mentoring and technical assistance, the operation of coworking/incubation facilities and the operation of early stage…

Community Improvement
6
Virginia Renewable Energy Alliance

The virginia renewable energy alliance (va-rea) promotes the development, use, and commercialization of renewable energy to increase business opportunities for industry to help achieve the commonwealth's growing energy demands while also…

—
7
Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties Inc

To promote, encourage, and market scientific research by the faculty, staff and students solely for the benefit of virginia polytechnic institute and state university (virginia tech).

—
8
Central Virginia Partnership for Economic Development

To promote economic development in the charlottesville and central virginia region.

—
9
West Virginia University Research Corporation

To foster and support research at west virginia university (wvu) and to provide evaluation, development, patenting, management and marketing services for inventions by the faculty, staff, and students of wvu.

Education
10
The West Virginia Chamber Foundation
Public Benefit
11
American Council of Engineering Companies of Virginia

Acec virginia brings together engineering firms of all sizes to provide business support and advocacy.

—
12
West Virginia University Innovation Corporation

To offer a wide range of strategic partnerships, academia, employment and community opportunities to the state, while promoting innovation and critical thinking within our workforce. Our vision is to catalyze economic growth and improve…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Virginia Patent Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hanover County Clean Technology Innovation Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 289 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF UVA: $2,759,868 · OtherTHE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF UVAVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY: $1,883,530 · OtherVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITYVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUS: $1,819,918 · OtherVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUS+182 more: $18,245,471 · Other+182 moreOLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,247,103 · EducationROANOKE BLACKSBURG INNOVATION NETWORK: $700,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA PATENT FOUNDATION: $250,000 · Education+1 more: $73,740 · EducationCHARLOTTESVILLE BIOHUB: $600,000 · Community ImprovementSTARTUP VIRGINIA INC: $400,000 · Community ImprovementVIRGINIA BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH PARK ACTIVATION CAPITAL: $300,000 · Community ImprovementSTARTWHEEL CORP: $200,000 · Community Improvement757 ACCELERATE INC: $200,000 · Community ImprovementVENTURE CENTRAL INC: $198,000 · Community ImprovementSHENANDOAH COMMUNITY CAPITAL FUND INC: $75,000 · Community ImprovementVIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FOUNDATION: $249,874 · HealthCarilion Medical Center: $74,977 · HealthHANOVER COUNTY CLEAN TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION CENTER: $200,000 · EnvironmentWIRELESS RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTH CAROLINA: $200,000 · Science & Tech
Other$24,708,787Education$2,270,843Community Improvement$1,973,000Health$324,851Environment$200,000Science & Tech$200,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,247,103 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetROANOKE BLACKSBURG INNOVATION NETWORK: $700,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetCHARLOTTESVILLE BIOHUB: $600,000 over 4y, 28% of budgetSTARTUP VIRGINIA INC: $400,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetVIRGINIA BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH PARK ACTIVATION CAPITAL: $300,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA PATENT FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetVIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FOUNDATION: $249,874 over 1y, 8.9% of budget757 ACCELERATE INC: $200,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetWIRELESS RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTH CAROLINA: $200,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetVENTURE CENTRAL INC: $198,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetTHE ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetSHENANDOAH COMMUNITY CAPITAL FUND INC: $75,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetCarilion Medical Center: $74,977 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $73,740 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROANOKE BLACKSBURG INNOVATION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds CHARLOTTESVILLE BIOHUB ↗
  • Who funds STARTUP VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH PARK ACTIVATION CAPITAL ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA PATENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HANOVER COUNTY CLEAN TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds STARTWHEEL CORP ↗
  • Who funds 757 ACCELERATE INC ↗
  • Who funds WIRELESS RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTH CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds VENTURE CENTRAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Old Dominion University Research FoundationVA23.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Old Dominion University Research Foundation · 757 Accelerate Inc · Virginia Biotechnology Research Park Activation Capital · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Virginia Innovation Partnership Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Virginia Innovation Partnership Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 289 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Virginia Innovation Partnership’s filings →

    More from the funding graph