Skip to content

· Private foundation

Virgil R Williams Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$133k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$464kEducation$105kAnimals$100kHealth$68kPublic Benefit$51kHuman Services$20kEnvironment$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $120k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH ON MAIN$20,000
CROSS POINTE BAPTIST CHURCH$20,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ATLANTA$20,000
EAGLE RANCH$10,000
IVY CREEK BAPTIST CHURCH$10,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$10,000
GWINNETT MEDICAL CENTER (GMC) FOUNDATION$10,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$10,000
AJ DONOHUE SCHOLARSHIP ENDOWMENT FUND$10,000
BLUEBIRDS FOR HOPE$5,000
NORTH GWINNETT CO-OP$5,000
TURNING POINT USA$1,000
ANNANDALE VILLAGE$1,000
GO TELL MINISTRIES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NORTH GWINNETT CO-OP: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Virgil R Williams Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 87% of the giving stays in GA; by stated purpose, 98%.

Virgil R Williams Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$704k · 13 repeat orgs$160k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
14

Total granted

$704k
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+1%

Still filing today

31%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionEducationPublic BenefitInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ATLANTA
    5× · 2017–2025 · $153k
  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF SNELLVILLE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $145k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2018–2023 · $100k

Funded once

  • DC
    Dunwoody Christian School Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -22%
  • GN
    GEORGIA NATURAL RESOURCES FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • YH
    YOUNG HARRIS COLLEGE - THE MILLER INSTITUTE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Georgia Christian School Inc

To promote the education of children in pre-K through twelfth grade in a Christian atmosphere.

—
2
Gatewood Schools Inc

The mission of gatewood schools is to educate students in a nurturing, christian environment while instilling the life long commendable characteristics of excellence, truth, honor, loyalty and prinde in each student. gatewood schools will…

Education
3
Georgia National Guard Family Support Foundation Inc

The primary purpose is to provide emergency financial relief to members of the georgia national guard.

Philanthropy
4
Marketplace Leaders Ministries Inc

Provide spiritual encouragement to men and women in the workplace.

Religion
5
Gwinnett Global School Inc

A private elementary school in gwinnett county, ga, founded in 2022, gwinnett global school provides a student-centered, multilingual education grounded in gods love for the world and our core values of curiosity, courage, and care.

Education
6
South Georgia Medical Center Inc

Our mission is to improve the lives of all we serve by being the destination of choice for healthcare services.

—
7
Global Scholars

Global scholars exists so that christian academics are adequately equipped to have a redemptive influence among their students, colleagues, universities and disciplines, at a reasonable cost.

—
8
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
9
Greg Fritz Ministries Inc

To proclaim gospel of jesus.

Religion
10
Run for the Fallen Inc

Benefit fallen soldiers

Human Services
11
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
12
Gwinnett Health System Inc

Gwinnett health system, inc., (health system) is operated for the benefit of and to perform the functions of gwinnett hospital system, inc. health system is the functionally integrated parent entity of a multi-entity healthcare system that…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ronny Spillers Evangelistic Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ATLANTA: $152,500 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ATLANTAFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF SNELLVILLE: $145,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF SNELLVILLEIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCROSSPOINTE BAPTIST CHURCH INC: $62,500 · OtherCROSSPOINTE BAPTIST CHURCH INCDunwoody Christian School Inc: $50,000 · OtherDunwoody Christian School IncFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH SNELLVILLE: $40,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH SNELLVILLEIVY CREEK BAPTIST CHURCH INC: $38,000 · OtherIVY CREEK BAPTIST CHURCH INCAJ DONOHUE SCHOLARSHIP ENDOWMENT FUND: $33,000 · Other+17 more: $78,800 · Other+17 moreGWINNETT HOSPITAL SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $47,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,228 · HealthEAGLE RANCH INC: $10,000 · HealthZELL MILLER FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Public BenefitRONNY SPILLERS EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES INC: $20,000 · ReligionGO TELL MINISTRIES F/K/A GO TELL INC: $1,000 · ReligionSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $200 · EducationSAFE AMERICA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentNORTH GWINNETT COOPERATIVE INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$699,800Health$67,728Public Benefit$50,000Religion$21,000Education$10,200Youth Development$10,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetZELL MILLER FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetDunwoody Christian School Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetGWINNETT HOSPITAL SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $47,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetRONNY SPILLERS EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES INC: $20,000 over 5y, 54% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,228 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVIETNAM WAR MEMORIAL OF GEORGIA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetSAFE AMERICA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetJunior Achievement of Georgia: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS' CHANCE OF GEORGIA INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ZELL MILLER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Dunwoody Christian School Inc ↗
  • Who funds GWINNETT HOSPITAL SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RONNY SPILLERS EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds VIETNAM WAR MEMORIAL OF GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAFE AMERICA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH GWINNETT COOPERATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Junior Achievement of Georgia ↗
  • Who funds GO TELL MINISTRIES F/K/A GO TELL INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS' CHANCE OF GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Virgil R Williams Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Virgil R Williams Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Virgil R Williams Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Virgil R Williams Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Virgil R Williams’ filings →

    More from the funding graph