Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vincent E and Mary Judith Shaw Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$84kEducation$55kReligion$46kArts & Culture$43kRecreation & Sports$10kHuman Services$7kHealth$6kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$124
Median grant
4
States reached
$31k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE MUNY$1,500
MOTHER OF GOOD COUNSEL$825
SERRA CLUB$575
JOSEPH & JOAN LIPIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND$500
BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP FOUNDATION$350
ST LOUIS CATHOLIC ACADEMY$250
BETHLEHEM UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$213
ORDER OF MALTA MISSOURI AREA$150
BIRTHRIGHT COUNSELING ST LOUIS$150
CHRISTIAN BROTHERS SERVICES$150
STE GENEVIEVE DU BOIS$124
CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING$103
THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNESJEWISH HOSPITAL$100
ST JOSEPHS ACADEMY$100
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CATHOLIC CHURCH$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OUR LADYS INN: $300 → 11%OUR LADYS INN: $250 → 11%OUR LADYS INN: $250 → 11%OUR LADYS INN: $250 → 11%OUR LADYS INN: $250 → 11%OUR LADYS INN: $250 → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $50 → 21%OUR LADYS INN: $350 → 11%OUR LADYS INN: $100 → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $104 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$252k · 56 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

56 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 43 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
80

Total granted

$252k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+44%

Still filing today

29%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationReligionHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +95%
  • CS
    Carmelite Sisters of the Divine Heart of Jesus
    6× · 2017–2024 · $3k · revenue +61%
  • RP
    RURAL PARISH WORKERS OF CHRIST THE KING
    3× · 2017–2023 · $2k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • TH
    The Healing Chair Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +116%
  • SC
    SIERRA CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE RURAL PARISH WORKERS
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ssm Health Care St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
2
Ssm Health Foundation - St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the health presence of god.

—
3
St Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
4
St Luke's Des Peres Episcopal- Presbyterian Hospital

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
5
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
6
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
7
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
8
Saint John's University

To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

—
9
Living Community of St Joseph

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

—
10
Nazareth Living Center

In the tradition of the sisters of st. joseph of carondelet and in partnership with benedictine, nazareth living center participates in the healing ministry of jesus ministering with compassion and responding creatively to the needs of…

Health
11
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
12
Avila University

Avila university, a catholic university sponsored by saint joseph educational ministries, a ministerial public juridic person of the catholic church (sjem), is a values-based community of learning providing liberal arts, professional,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Patrick Center; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 146 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/47
Grantees still filing
35/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VISITATION ACADEMY: $84,100 · OtherVISITATION ACADEMYCHAMINADE COLLEGE PREPARATORY: $49,546 · OtherCHAMINADE COLLEGE PREPARATORYSTE GENEVIEVE DU BOIS: $33,542 · OtherSTE GENEVIEVE DU BOISOUR LADY OF MERCY: $14,530 · OtherOUR LADY OF MERCYARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS: $13,690 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS+113 more: $44,263 · Other+113 moreMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $9,600 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $96 · Arts & CultureCarmelite Sisters of the Divine Heart of Jesus: $3,075 · HealthThe Healing Chair Inc: $1,200 · HealthMOTHER OF GOOD COUNSEL HOME: $1,100 · HealthBETHESDA HEALTH GROUP FOUNDATION INC: $650 · Health+7 more: $325 · HealthRURAL PARISH WORKERS OF CHRIST THE KING: $2,446 · ReligionCOVENANT NETWORK: $500 · ReligionWORD ON FIRE CATHOLIC MINISTRIES: $450 · ReligionOUR LADYS INN: $2,000 · Human ServicesPEDAL THE CAUSE: $104 · Human Services+1 more: $50 · Human ServicesST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $1,150 · EducationLOYOLA ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS: $500 · Education+5 more: $183 · EducationCRUDEM FOUNDATION INC: $655 · InternationalACTION IN AFRICA INC: $105 · International
Other$239,671Arts & Culture$9,696Health$6,350Religion$3,396Human Services$2,154Education$1,833International$760

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $9,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCarmelite Sisters of the Divine Heart of Jesus: $3,075 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRURAL PARISH WORKERS OF CHRIST THE KING: $2,446 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOUR LADYS INN: $2,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Healing Chair Inc: $1,200 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $1,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOTHER OF GOOD COUNSEL HOME: $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCRUDEM FOUNDATION INC: $655 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBETHESDA HEALTH GROUP FOUNDATION INC: $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE IGNITES ST LOUIS: $550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT NETWORK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORD ON FIRE CATHOLIC MINISTRIES: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT COUNSELING ST LOUIS: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSt Mary's University: $189 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACTION IN AFRICA INC: $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST PATRICK CENTER: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR LITTLE HAVEN: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $96 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY: $53 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINE OF OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaritas Connections Inc: $50 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Sisters of The Poor: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Louis Police Foundation: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARRIS HOUSE FOUNDATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITFIELD SCHOOL INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRISE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION SOUTH: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNCOAST HUMANE SOCIETYINC: $5 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds Carmelite Sisters of the Divine Heart of Jesus ↗
  • Who funds RURAL PARISH WORKERS OF CHRIST THE KING ↗
  • Who funds OUR LADYS INN ↗
  • Who funds The Healing Chair Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MOTHER OF GOOD COUNSEL HOME ↗
  • Who funds CRUDEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IGNITES ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT NETWORK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO47.2× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Roman Catholic Foundation of Eastern Missouri · The Shaughnessy Family Foundation · Ross Family Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Ravarino Family Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · International Charitable Foundation · The Theodore a Kienstra Foundation · The Crawford Taylor Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vincent E and Mary Judith Shaw Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vincent E and Mary Judith Shaw Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 146 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vincent E and Mary Judith Shaw Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph