Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Villagereach

VILLAGEREACH's mission is to transform health care delivery to reach everyone.

$3.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$193k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

International$461kScience & Tech$208kHealth$173k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $397,450 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,803,472 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,406,022 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $72k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $326k
$30,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FHI PARTNERS LLC$192,797
GLOBAL HEALTH STRATEGIES$133,002
CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE$30,000
JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC$27,776
SUPPLY CHAIN NOW$13,875
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 83% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ID INSIGHT INC: $132k → 10%GLOBAL HEALTH STRATEGIES: $133k → 17%VITALLIANCE CORPORATION: $76k → 14%FHI PARTNERS LLC: $193k → 11%CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE: $30k → 11%PPGNHI (PLANNED PARENTHOOD): $115k → 9%JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC: $28k → 7%FHI PARTNERS LLC: $122k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
MA
CA
VA
NC
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region — $3.4M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$3.4M · 100% · 26 grants

Stated purpose: SUPPORT FOR COVID RESEARCH · SUPPORT FOR SUPPLY CHAIN · SUPPORT FOR VACCINE RESEARCH

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
1/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Family Health International Inc — $314,591 · InternationalFamily Health International IncID INSIGHT INC — $132,411 · InternationalID INSIGHT INC+1 more — $13,875 · InternationalGLOBAL HEALTH STRATEGIES — $133,002 · OtherGLOBAL HEALTH STRATEGIESVITALLIANCE CORPORATION — $75,898 · OtherVITALLIANCE CORPORATIONCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE — $30,000 · OtherCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVEJSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC — $27,776 · OtherJSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE I…PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY — $114,913 · HealthPLANNED PARENTH…
International$460,877Other$266,676Health$114,913

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFamily Health International Inc — $314,591 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetID INSIGHT INC — $132,411 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY — $114,913 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC — $27,776 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC — $13,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PathWA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Path · Gates Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Villagereach funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 69%
  • Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc69% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2024

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph