Skip to content

Massachusetts · Public charity

Village by Village Inc

To assist charities in workplace giving campaigns

$53k
Granted FY2018
2
Itemized grants FY2018
2
Organizations funded FY2018
0%
First-time grantees FY2018
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2018
$22k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2018
$11,907
Largest grant, FY2018
$11,907
Organizations funded a year
2 to 6
FY2017 to FY2018
States reached, FY2018
2
Total assets, FY2018
$281

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2018, 0% of the organizations Village by Village Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20182$22k0%
FY20176$63kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Environment$35kInternational$33kAnimals$10kCrime & Legal$7k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2018, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Global Water$29,1162n/a
Beyond Borders Inc$25,9302n/a
International Animal Rescue US Inc$9,7701n/a
Cooperative for Education$7,01110%
Asociacion Interamericana Para la Defensa del Ambiente$6,5661n/a
Rainforest Foundation Inc$6,31610%

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC9.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Village by Village Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Village by Village Inc?

Find your warmest path to Village by Village Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Village by Village Inc

How much does Village by Village Inc give?
Village by Village Inc reported 2 itemized grants totaling $21,664, out of $53,273 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2018 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 6 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2018.
What does Village by Village Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2018, its largest causes are Environment (42%), International (39%), Animals (12%).
Who are Village by Village Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2018: Global Water ($29k), Beyond Borders Inc ($26k), International Animal Rescue US Inc ($10k).
Does Village by Village Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2018, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Village by Village Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Network for Good, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Village by Village Inc based?
Village by Village Inc is based in MA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2021) is on record and reports $24k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2018, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Village by Village’s filings →

More from the funding graph