How much did VIJAY AND MARIE GORADIA CHARITABLE grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of VIJAY AND MARIE GORADIA CHARITABLE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

india

2019

indiaarts

2020

houstonindo-americansightlifewomen movingmoving millions

2021

further exempt

2022

further exempt

2023

further exempt

2024

further exempt

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k3 grants · $13k
$10k–50k7 grants · $115k
$250k+2 grants · $850k

$12,400

Median grant

States reached

$40M

Total assets

Largest grants

ARMMAN-USA$600,000
NEW VENTURE FUND$250,000
TEXAS TRIBUNE INC$25,000
ASIA SOCIETY TEXAS CENTER$23,000
CANCARE INC$22,840
TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$12,400
THE PHILANTHROPY WORKSHOP$12,000
WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC$10,000
HINDU TEMPLE OF THE WOODLAND$10,000
ST PATRICK CATHOLIC CHURCH$5,000
INDIASPORA$5,000
19TH NEWS$2,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $811k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7% — the area typically sits at 11%. 9% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of VIJAY AND MARIE GORADIA CHARITABLE’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

VIJAY AND MARIE GORADIA CHARITABLElessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 18% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$13M · 29 repeat orgs$9.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +121% since the first grant, against +45% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$13M

$8.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+121%

+45%

Still filing today

69%

61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $701k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

S
SIGHTLIFE
6× · 2017–2022 · $4.1M · revenue +5%
AI
ANTARA INTERNATIONAL
3× · 2021–2023 · $1.8M · revenue +383% · 60% of their budget
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION
4× · 2017–2021 · $1.3M · revenue +31%

Funded once

UO
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER
one grant, 2023 · $7.0M
A
ARMMAN
one grant, 2023 · $600k
S
STIR
one grant, 2021 · $250k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

IndoAmerican Chamber of Commerce Greater Houston

Increasing trade and services between usa & india. also to enhance trade within the greater houston area.

Community Improvement

Glasstire

Glasstire is an online magazine for visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture

Silambam Houston

We seek to increase the appreciation and understanding of Indian artistic traditions across cultural boundaries, through comprehensive arts education, outreach, and exceptional arts programming, and by creating opportunities for young…

Arts & Culture

Texas India Forum

To encourage cooperation between the usa and india and advance the shared values of democracy, inclusive economic development and mutual respect.

—

Us-India Strategic Partnership Forum Inc

Activities include creating a strategic partnership between the US & India and promoting bilateral trade. It is about business and government coming together in new ways to create meaningful opportunities that have the power to change the…

Community Improvement

India Partners

International relief, development, and education.

International

Houston Local Information

To strengthen democracy and improve the lives of all Houstonians one story at a time.

Arts & Culture

Traveling South Asian Literacy

Traveling South Asian Literacy Festival brings together a diversity of South Asian Literary voices to surface and deepen conversations around key issues in South Asia and its diasporas. It curates and documents historically…

Arts & Culture

The McCombs School of Business

To provide support to The University of Texas McCombs School of Business.

Education

Houston Maharashtra Mandal

Providing a platform for the Indian Diaspora from the Maharashtra state of India for social engagement as well as promotion and dissemenation of its language and culture.

Arts & Culture

Indian Doctors Association

Ida houston is a non-profit, networking forum for physicians of indian origin to provide mentorship in academic excellence, patient care & promote health education for the greater houston community.

Human Services

Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

To be Texas' foremost champion of individual rights & freedoms through education & litigation.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asia Society Texas Center and the most unlike its peers is The Alliance Collaboration. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/50

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,515

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

49 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

49/49

Grantees still filing

38/49

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$11,465,571Community Improvement$4,083,500Education$2,050,000Health$1,817,400Philanthropy$1,438,100International$878,460Human Services$811,850

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX20× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Houston Endowment Inc · Vivian L Smith Foundation · Houston Arts Alliance · The Skoll Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Gates Foundation · Motwani Jadeja Family Foundation · The Methodist Hospital · The Kendeda Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation VIJAY AND MARIE GORADIA CHARITABLE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ANTARA INTERNATIONAL.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~0 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.8× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 301250104 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ANTARA INTERNATIONAL, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 60% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Vijay and Marie Goradia Charitable?

Find your warmest path to Vijay and Marie Goradia Charitable through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

VIJAY AND MARIE GORADIA CHARITABLE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

49 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Vijay and Marie Goradia Charitable?

More from the funding graph

VIJAY AND MARIE GORADIA CHARITABLE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

49 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Vijay and Marie Goradia Charitable?

More from the funding graph