· Private foundation
Motwani Jadeja Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $111k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $539k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Atlantic Council of the US | $115,000 |
| TIE Silicon Valley | $105,000 |
| Munich Security Conference Fdtn | $100,000 |
| World Woman Foundation | $81,050 |
| Hudson Institute | $75,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $62,500 |
| Hindu American Foundation | $25,000 |
| Center for a New American Security | $24,000 |
| Aspen Institute | $21,933 |
| Asia Society of Northern CA | $20,000 |
| Indiaspora | $10,000 |
| Indialogue Foundation | $10,000 |
| We Are All Human Fdtn | $9,000 |
| Indologue Events and Ideas | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 79% of grant dollars ($2.4M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 21% that went abroad ($634k) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 21% of all-years giving ($634k)
5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +88% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $239k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTiE Silicon Valley Inc dba Indus Entrepreneurs3× · 2022–2024 · $255k · revenue +19%
- FFFOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE INC4× · 2018–2023 · $155k · revenue +114%
- ACATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC2× · 2023–2024 · $116k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $125k
- PUPratham USAone grant, 2019 · $125k
- TMTHE MILKEN INSTITUTEgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +47%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Us-india policy institute (usipi)undertaking policy research on diversity and inclusive developments in india and the usa. usipis vision for equal access to freedom,justice, and opportunity in india rests on its three pillars; research &…
Improve excellence and access in higher education. Current focus is on India. Thus, Nalanda 2.0's current focus is to make India's higher education system world-class by building a world-class multidisciplinary research university,…
Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…
Activities include creating a powerful strategic partnership between the U.S. & India and promoting bilateral trade. It is about business and government coming together in new ways to create meaningful opportunities for citizens.
To create an impact on the lives of the disadvantaged, under-served populations by nurturing models of innovation and entrepreneurship.
Dedicated to the advancement of knowledge about india and the promotion of intellectual engagement with india in american universities by providing research fellowship support, training in indian languages, knowledge of indian culture, and…
The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…
Research and education of United Nations activities
Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…
Researching policy ideas on climate and clean energy in India, engaging legislators and business leaders to discuss those ideas.
Empowering mobilizers like teach for india with intellectual, human, and financial resources to eliminate educational inequity in india.
The specific purpose, mission, and activity of the corporation is to secure funding for promoting education, research, technology development, startup incubation, acceleration, and translational research at the indian institute of science…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The American India Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TiE Silicon Valley Inc dba Indus Entrepreneurs ↗
- Who funds TIE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD WOMAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds THE MILKEN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds SHAREDIMPACT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STREETCODE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Hudson Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds INDIASPORA ↗
- Who funds Equality Now Inc ↗
- Who funds GRADUATE THEOLOGICAL UNION ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE CANALES PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
- Who funds FILM FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds Center for a New American Security Inc ↗
- Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
- Who funds Fair Observer ↗
- Who funds ACUMEN FUND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Naren & Vinita Gupta Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Shg Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The San Francisco Foundation · Wadhwani Charitable Foundation · Dhanam Foundation · Vijay and Marie Goradia Charitable Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Motwani Jadeja Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Motwani Jadeja Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Motwani Jadeja Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.