Skip to content

· Private foundation

Victor L Blood and Maudaline L Blood Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$94kFood & Nutrition$70kEducation$70kHuman Services$60kPublic Safety & Disaster$45kArts & Culture$27kRecreation & Sports$27kMembership Benefit$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$819k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEROY AMBULANCE SERVICE$5,000
HOPE CENTER OF LEROY$4,500
LEROY CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY PROJECT$4,500
AMERICAN LEGION$4,500
LEROY SPORTS BOOSTERS$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
SUNSHINE NURSERY SCHOOL$4,000
LEROY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$4,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$3,500
LEROY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$3,000
PURPLE PONY THERAPUTIC HORSEMANSHIP$3,000
LOVE BUGS LEARNING CENTER$3,000
LEROY ROTARY COMMUNITY KITCHEN$2,500
FAITH COMMUNITY CHURCH$2,500
LEROY BUSINESS COUNCIL$1,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PROJECT STORK INC: $3k → 10%PROJECT STORK INC: $3k → 10%PROJECT STORK INC: $1k → 10%HOPE CENTER OF LEROY: $5k → 10%HOPE CENTER OF LEROY: $5k → 10%HOPE CENTER OF LEROY: $5k → 10%HOPE CENTER OF LEROY: $5k → 10%HOPE CENTER OF LEROY: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$431k · 27 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against -37% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
12

Total granted

$431k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
-37%

Still filing today

19%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LEROY AMBULANCE SERVICE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +59%
  • HC
    HOPE CENTER OF LEROY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $24k · revenue +131%
  • Project Stork Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $7k · revenue +192%

Funded once

  • LC
    LEROY COMMUNITY POOL ASSSOCIATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northern York County Historical & Preservation Society
—
2
Leroy Csd #1 Uw Ehw
—
3
Greater Lenox Ambulance Service Inc

To serve as a voluntary general ambulance and advanced life support service for the rural towns of lenox, lincoln, and the villages of wampsville and canastota, new york.

Health
4
Ny Ll Inc
—
5
Schuyler County Community Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Ny New Hope Pregnancy Resource Center
—
7
Ellen M Leach Memorial Home
—
8
LeRoy Area Historical Society

Promote history of the city of LeRoy

Arts & Culture
9
Loretto Child Care Center Inc

Non-profit childcare program serving children 6 wks-12 yrs old. 24 hour service(if needed). developmental program meeting needs of children.

Human Services
10
Leroy Emergency Ambulance Service Inc

Provide emergency & routine ambulance services

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Aviation Historical Society of Central New York Inc

Historical society providing education on local aviation.

Recreation & Sports
12
Give Life Ny
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Center of Leroy Inc; the most unlike its peers is The William L Richter Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEROY CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY PROJECT: $34,000 · OtherLEROY CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY PROJECTSUNSHINE NURSERY SCHOOL: $25,930 · OtherSUNSHINE NURSERY SCHOOLAMERICAN LEGION: $25,500 · OtherAMERICAN LEGIONLEROY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $24,537 · OtherLEROY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHLEROY BAPTIST CHURCH: $22,800 · OtherLEROY BAPTIST CHURCHST MARK'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $21,000 · OtherST MARK'S EPISCOPAL CHURCHFAITH COMMUNITY CHURCH: $20,900 · OtherFAITH COMMUNITY CHURCHLEROY ROTARY COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $18,400 · OtherOUR LADY OF MERCY OUTREACH: $17,450 · OtherLEROY METHODIST CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherCHURCH OF LIVING WATERS - HOPE CENTER: $14,000 · OtherMACHPELAH CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $13,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,800 · Other+21 more: $109,097 · Other+21 moreLEROY AMBULANCE SERVICE INC: $45,000 · HealthLEROY AMBU…HOPE CENTER OF LEROY INC: $23,800 · Human ServicesProject Stork Inc: $7,000 · Human ServicesLEROY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $15,200 · Arts & CultureLOVE BUGS LEARNING CENTER INC: $4,900 · EducationTHE WILLIAM L RICHTER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$374,614Health$45,000Human Services$30,800Arts & Culture$15,200Education$4,900Philanthropy$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEROY AMBULANCE SERVICE INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetHOPE CENTER OF LEROY INC: $23,800 over 5y, 11% of budgetLEROY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $15,200 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetMACHPELAH CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $13,200 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetProject Stork Inc: $7,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetLOVE BUGS LEARNING CENTER INC: $4,900 over 2y, 10% of budgetYWCA OF GENESEE COUNTY INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE WILLIAM L RICHTER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEROY AMBULANCE SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CENTER OF LEROY INC ↗
  • Who funds LEROY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MACHPELAH CEMETERY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Project Stork Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOVE BUGS LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YWCA OF GENESEE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WILLIAM L RICHTER FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo IncNY13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Victor L Blood and Maudaline L Blood Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Victor L Blood and Maudaline L Blood Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Victor L Blood and Maudaline L Blood Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Victor L Blood and Maudaline L Blood Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Victor L Blood and Maudaline L Blood’s filings →

    More from the funding graph