Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vermont Academy of Science and Engineering Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$109kScience & Tech$60kCommunity Improvement$6kYouth Development$5kEmployment$4kArts & Culture$2kMembership Benefit$2kPublic Benefit$500
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$15k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Essex Westford Educational Communit$2,987
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Lyndon Institute$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
River Valley Technical Center$2,000
Champlain Valley School District$1,808
Friends of the Fletcher Free Library Inc$1,500
The Hack Foundation$1,500
Archytas Education Corp$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Harwood Unified Union School District$1,500
Univ of Vermont 4H Program Inc$1,500
Milton Town School District$1,500
Southwest Vermont Union Elementary School District$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Rural Arts Collaborative: $1k → 14%Friends of the Fletcher Free Library Inc: $2k → 10%Friends of Fletcher Free Library: $800 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$82k · 21 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
68

Total granted

$82k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+8%

Still filing today

29%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesScience & TechCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LI
    LYNDON INSTITUTE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $5k · revenue +12%
  • VF
    VERMONT FARM AND FOREST
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3k · revenue +30%
  • TS
    The Schoolhouse Learning Center Inc
    3× · 2020–2025 · $2k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • RC
    Rutland City Public Schools
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • TO
    TEAMS OF INNOVATIVE PROBLEM SOLVERS
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • SB
    SOUTH BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Bridge School inc

The Bridge School is a state approved independent Elementary school located in Middlebury, VT. Small by design, Bridge School accepts up to 50 preK-6th grade students annually to ensure students build strong relationships with peers and…

Education
2
Mountain Village Charter School

Mountain Village is a public Nature-based, Montessori school, engaging students in experiences that integrate natural environments with the Montessori curriculum, igniting achievement in academic, social-emotional and physical development.

Education
3
Maple Street Foundation Inc

Maple Street School is a joyful academic community that cultivates personal and social responsibility. We nurture intellectual and creative growth through an engaging curriculum. Our culture of respect inspires confident learners.

Education
4
Discovery School Inc

We are a private, independent school whose mission is to provide each child the educational opportunity to discover, with perseverance and imagination, the joy of learning and the interconnectedness of our world. Our vision is to bring…

Education
5
Farmington Academy Inc

Our mission at The Farmington Valley Academy Montessori is to offer an excellent education characterized by intellectual rigor combined with personal warmth. Dr. Maria Montessori's principles and the insights and ideas of other gifted…

Education
6
Ruby Mountain Acton Academy

Private school

Education
7
The Initiative a Vermont Waldorf High School

To create, nurture, and maintain a healthy, thriving and affordable secondary education program out of an anthroposophically based picture of the threefold human being (body, soul, and spirit) that will serve interested families and their…

—
8
Middle Grades Collaborative

We are a collaboration of colleges and universities specializing in professional development for middle school educators. designed for aspiring and practicing teachers of 10-15 year olds, our organization offers conferences, journals,…

Education
9
Foxcroft School

Foxcroft's mission is to help every girl explore her unique voice and to develop the skills, confidence, and courage to share it with the world with emphasis on Our Values of Respect, Integrity, Kindness, Service.

Education
10
The School for Global Thinkers

Our mission is to challenge and nurture young women to thrive in future global markets through personalized STEM advanced academics. Through a supportive small school and single-gender environment, project-based learning, and STEM advanced…

Education
11
Shelburne Craft School Inc

The Shelburne Craft School's mission is to inspire individual creativity by providing hands-on education in craft and art.

Education
12
Long Trail School

To provide an intellectually enriching college-preparatory curriculum in a supportive, caring environment to foster in each student a lifelong commitment to excellence.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vermont Farm and Forest; the most unlike its peers is Archytas Education Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

North Country Supervisory Union: $9,718 · OtherNorth Country Supervisory UnionCHAMPLAIN VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $6,908 · OtherRIVER VALLEY TECHNICAL CENTER: $6,500 · OtherHARWOOD UNIFIED UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT: $5,877 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,719 · Other+83 more: $124,890 · Other+83 moreRutland Area Robotics Inc: $5,000 · EducationRutland Ar…LYNDON INSTITUTE INC: $4,733 · EducationLYNDON INS…ARCHYTAS EDUCATION CORP: $3,800 · EducationARCHYTAS E…St Johnsbury Academy: $1,476 · EducationSt Johnsbu…THETFORD ACADEMY: $1,000 · EducationTHETFORD A…BURR & BURTON SEMINARY: $1,000 · EducationBURR & BUR…FRIENDS OF THE FLETCHER FREE LIBRARY: $2,300 · Human ServicesRURAL ARTS COLLABORATIVE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE HACK FOUNDATION D/B/A HACK CLUB: $3,000 · Science & TechVERMONT FARM AND FOREST: $3,000 · EnvironmentBTV IGNITE INC: $1,000 · Community ImprovementMiddlebury Community TV: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$159,612Education$17,009Human Services$3,300Science & Tech$3,000Environment$3,000Community Improvement$1,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRutland Area Robotics Inc: $5,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetLYNDON INSTITUTE INC: $4,733 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HACK FOUNDATION D/B/A HACK CLUB: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT FARM AND FOREST: $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetThe Schoolhouse Learning Center Inc: $2,425 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE FLETCHER FREE LIBRARY: $2,300 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSt Johnsbury Academy: $1,476 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRURAL ARTS COLLABORATIVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHETFORD ACADEMY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBTV IGNITE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBURR & BURTON SEMINARY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMiddlebury Community TV: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetVERMONT DAY SCHOOL INC: $800 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Rutland Area Robotics Inc ↗
  • Who funds LYNDON INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARCHYTAS EDUCATION CORP ↗
  • Who funds THE HACK FOUNDATION D/B/A HACK CLUB ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT FARM AND FOREST ↗
  • Who funds The Schoolhouse Learning Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE FLETCHER FREE LIBRARY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vermont Energy Investment CorporationVT32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vermont Energy Investment Corporation · The Vermont Community Foundation · Stern Center for Language and Learning · Vermont Afterschool Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vermont Academy of Science and Engineering Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vermont Academy of Science and Engineering Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Vermont Farm and Forest: 20% of income from government
  • The Schoolhouse Learning Center Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Lyndon Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • St Johnsbury Academy: 3% of income from government
  • Burr & Burton Seminary: 2% of income from government
  • Thetford Academy: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Vermont Academy of Science and Engineering Inc?

Find your warmest path to Vermont Academy of Science and Engineering Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 100 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vermont Academy of Science and Engineering’s filings →

More from the funding graph