Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vera L Smith Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$94k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$333kFood & Nutrition$162kHealth$157kAnimals$113kReligion$57kInternational$37kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $41k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SNOWCAP COMMUNITY CHARITIES$14,000
PORTLAND ADVENTIST COMMUNITY SERVIC$14,000
OHSU SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY$13,000
OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY$8,500
NORTH COUNTY FOOD BANK$7,500
CARE$7,000
LOAVES & FISHES INC$5,000
DOVE LEWIS EMERGENCY ANIMAL HOSPITA$5,000
WALLACE MEDICAL CONCERN$4,000
WILLIAM TEMPLE HOUSE$3,500
RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND$3,500
SHEPHERD'S DOOR$3,500
PORTLAND RESCUE MISSION$3,500
NEHALEM BAY HEALTH CLINIC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $153k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SNOWCAP COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $15k → 12%SNOWCAP COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $15k → 12%SNOWCAP COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $15k → 12%SNOWCAP COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $15k → 12%SNOWCAP COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $14k → 12%SNOWCAP COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $13k → 12%SNOWCAP COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $12k → 12%SNOWCAP COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $12k → 12%SNOWCAP COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $12k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $4k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $4k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $4k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $4k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $4k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $3k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $3k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $3k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$856k · 18 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$856k
$3k

Still filing today

61%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsInternationalFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SNOWCAP COMMUNITY SERVICES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $123k · revenue +89%
  • OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $72k · revenue +26%
  • NC
    NORTH COUNTY FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +265%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic

Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved

Health
2
Willamette Family Medical Center Inc

Providing health care services

Health
3
Portland Street Medicine

We offer our homeless neighbors accessible whole-person care to improve and support health, and to bridge a gap in trust between people and systems.

Health
4
Northwest Medical Foundation Tillamook

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health
5
North Olympic Healthcare Network

To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.

Health
6
Portland Adventist Medical Center

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health
7
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
8
Northeast Oregon Network

Northeast Oregon Network (the Organization) is a non-profit organization established to create a healthier Oregon by reducing barriers for both residents and regional systems that support their health. The Organization fulfills its mission…

Health
9
Open Door Community Health Centers

Open Door Community Health Centers promotes social justice and human dignity through exceptional patient-centered care that improves the health and well-being of our patients, community, and staff.

Health
10
Legacy Mount Hood Medical Center

Legacy Mount Hood Medical Center (LMHMC) was founded in 1922 and is a community hospital in Gresham, Oregon with 115 licensed beds. LMHMC offers a wide range of services including family birth, diagnostic services, cancer treatment,…

Health
11
Northwest Human Services Inc

Mission: creating a healthy community with respect, compassion and acceptance for all. vision: working together to empower individuals to improve their health, well-being and safety. core values: community - the safe, caring, and inclusive…

Human Services
12
Penobscot Community Health Center

Penobscot Community Health Center (PCHC) is a non-profit organization incorporated in 1997 that is governed by a Board of community volunteers and is the largest Federally Qualified Health Center in Maine. PCHC is driven by its mission…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oregon Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Oregon Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PORTLAND ADVENTIST COMMUNITY SERVIC: $122,000 · OtherPORTLAND ADVENTIST COMMUNITY SERVICOHSU SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY: $88,500 · OtherOHSU SCHOOL OF DENTISTRYCARE: $58,500 · OtherCARELOAVES & FISHES INC: $52,000 · OtherLOAVES & FISHES INCTHE WALLACE MEDICAL CONCERN: $38,500 · OtherTHE WALLACE MEDICAL CONCERNWILLIAM TEMPLE HOUSE: $33,000 · OtherWILLIAM TEMPLE HOUSEPORTLAND RESCUE MISSION: $29,500 · OtherPORTLAND RESCUE MISSIONSHEPHERD'S DOOR: $27,000 · OtherSHEPHERD'S DOOROREGON FOOD BANK: $17,000 · Other+3 more: $12,500 · OtherSNOWCAP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $123,000 · Human ServicesSNOWCAP COMMUNITY SE…RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $29,500 · Human ServicesRAPHAEL HOUSE OF POR…OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $71,500 · AnimalsOREGON HUMANE …DOVE LEWIS EMERGENCY ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC: $41,000 · AnimalsDOVE LEWIS EME…NORTH COUNTY FOOD BANK: $59,500 · Food & NutritionMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $22,000 · InternationalMercy Corps: $15,000 · InternationalNehalem Bay Health Center & Pharmacy: $20,000 · Health
Other$478,500Human Services$152,500Animals$112,500Food & Nutrition$59,500International$37,000Health$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSNOWCAP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $123,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $71,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH COUNTY FOOD BANK: $59,500 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetDOVE LEWIS EMERGENCY ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC: $41,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WALLACE MEDICAL CONCERN: $38,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM TEMPLE HOUSE: $33,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $29,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $22,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNehalem Bay Health Center & Pharmacy: $20,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SNOWCAP COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds DOVE LEWIS EMERGENCY ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WALLACE MEDICAL CONCERN ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM TEMPLE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Nehalem Bay Health Center & Pharmacy ↗
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Careoregon Inc · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vera L Smith Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vera L Smith Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Nehalem Bay Health Center & Pharmacy: 40% of income from government
  • The Wallace Medical Concern: 27% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International: 14% of income from government
  • Raphael House of Portland: 10% of income from government
  • William Temple House: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Vera L Smith Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Vera L Smith Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vera L Smith’s filings →

More from the funding graph