Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vbs Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$537k
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$673kArts & Culture$581kAnimals$500kHuman Services$365kEnvironment$346kInternational$342kCrime & Legal$335kFood & Nutrition$115kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $432k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR HUMANE TECHNOLOGY$70,000
KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA AND HEALTH$40,000
FACING HISTORY AND OURSELVES$40,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$32,000
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE$30,000
TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND$30,000
MIND BODY SOLUTIONS$25,000
OCEANA$25,000
GBH$20,366
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$20,000
FIRE FOUNDATION$15,000
UNITED HATZALAH$15,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$15,000
MUSICA FRANKLIN$15,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $412k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA AND HEALTH: $40k → 8%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA AND HEALTH: $40k → 8%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA AND HEALTH: $40k → 8%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA AND HEALTH: $40k → 8%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA AND HEALTH: $40k → 8%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA AND HEALTH: $40k → 8%TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND: $30k → 8%TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND: $30k → 8%TANZANIA CHILDRENS FUND: $25k → 8%TANZANIA CHILDRENS FUND: $25k → 8%TANZANIA CHILDRENS FUND: $20k → 8%TANZANIA CHILDRENS FUND: $20k → 8%TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND: $12k → 8%TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 49 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
9

Total granted

$3.8M
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+17%

Still filing today

18%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $172k · revenue +35%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $170k · revenue +98%
  • FH
    FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $156k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • MS
    MEDICINS SANS FRONTIERS USA
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • AH
    ANIMAL HOUSE
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • DP
    DOULA PROGRAM TO ACCOMPANY AND COMFOR
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marin Theatre Company

Marin theatre company is the bay area's premier mid-size theater and the leading professional theater in the north bay. mtc produces a six-show season of provocative plays by passionate playwrights from the 20th century and today in an…

Arts & Culture
2
Bristol Riverside Theatre Co Inc

To engage audiences and artists alike with exceptional performances, inspired writing and superior productions that motivate us to think harder, to feel more deeply, to laugh more fully and to reflect on ourselves and the world in which we…

Arts & Culture
3
Ford's Theatre Society

Ford's theatre explores the legacy of president abraham lincoln and celebrates the american experience through theatre and education.

Arts & Culture
4
Ballet Theatre Foundation Inc

To create, to present, to preserve, and to extend the great repertoire of classical dancing through exciting performances and educational programming of the highest quality, presented to the widest possible audience. american ballet…

Arts & Culture
5
The American Theatre Guild

The american theatre guild is dedicated to providing the experience of live theatre to foster passion, inspire creativity and empower youth within our communities.

Arts & Culture
6
The Irish Repertory Theatre Companyinc

The irish repertory theatre (the "theatre") mission is to bring works by irish and irish american masters and contemporary playwrights to american audiences, to provide a context for understanding the contemporary irish american experience…

—
7
United States Artists Inc

To invest in america's finest artists and illuminate the value of artists to society.

Arts & Culture
8
Music and Dance Theater Chicago Inc
Arts & Culture
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
10
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
11
Theaterworks Inc

Theaterworks' mission is to share intimate stories that engage all audiences. it creates exceptional contemporary theater that entertains, celebrates new voices, and invites meaningful conversations. its vision is to inspire a more…

Arts & Culture
12
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Facing History & Ourselves Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hearts and Noses Hospital Clown Troupe Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTER FOR HUMANE TECHNOLOGY: $340,000 · OtherCENTER FOR HUMANE TECHNOLOGYINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $335,000 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICEMINDBODY SOLUTIONS: $325,000 · OtherMINDBODY SOLUTIONSELEPHANT FAMILY: $120,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $105,000 · OtherWGBH: $100,000 · Other+45 more: $1,467,613 · Other+45 moreKRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH: $240,000 · Human ServicesKRIPALU CEN…THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC: $172,000 · Human ServicesTHE TANZANI…FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $156,000 · Arts & CultureFACING HIST…MUSICA FRANKLIN INC: $130,000 · Arts & CultureMUSICA FRAN…AMERICAN REPERTORY THEATRE CO INC: $65,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN RE…THE CONCORD PLAYERS INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CONCORD…+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $170,000 · InternationalENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $75,000 · EnvironmentHearts and Noses Hospital Clown Troupe Inc: $40,000 · HealthTHE BINA FARM INC: $10,000 · Health
Other$2,792,613Human Services$412,000Arts & Culture$396,000International$170,000Environment$75,000Health$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH: $240,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC: $172,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $170,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $156,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMUSICA FRANKLIN INC: $130,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN REPERTORY THEATRE CO INC: $65,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHearts and Noses Hospital Clown Troupe Inc: $40,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetTHE CONCORD PLAYERS INC: $40,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetTHE BINA FARM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGREATER BOSTON STAGE COMPANY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSICA FRANKLIN INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN REPERTORY THEATRE CO INC ↗
  • Who funds Hearts and Noses Hospital Clown Troupe Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CONCORD PLAYERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vbs Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vbs Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Musica Franklin Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Stage Company: 2% of income from government
  • American Repertory Theatre Co Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Vbs Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Vbs Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vbs’ filings →

More from the funding graph