Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Vankep Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$190kHuman Services$9kHealth$8kEducation$5kArts & Culture$4kCivil Rights$3k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS CHARITIES$13,870
ST JAMES PARISH$5,000
CARMELITE MINISTRY OF ST THERESE$5,000
ST PETER'S CHURCH IN THE LOOP$3,000
BASILICA OF ST JOSAPHAT$2,150
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIFES CONNECTIONS: $4k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$171k · 6 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
11

Total granted

$171k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+129%

Still filing today

33%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionCivil RightsArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VC
    VARIOUS CHARITIES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $117k
  • BO
    BASILICA OF ST JOSAPHAT
    8× · 2017–2024 · $38k
  • IH
    IMMACULATE HEART MEDIA INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $6k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • BO
    BASILICA OF ST JOSAPHAT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • Augustine Institute Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +167%
  • SA
    ST AUGUSTINE UNIVERSITY PARISH
    one grant, 2023 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Word On Fire Catholic Ministries

Word on fire catholic ministries is a global media apostolate that supports the work of bishop robert barron and reaches millons of individuals to draw them back to or into the catholic faith.

Religion
2
Lifesitenewscom Inc

Lifesitenews.com publishes approximately 4,000 articles covering issues concerning life, family, faith and cultural issues. these articles reach over 20 million readers, keeping them well informed about social issues of great importance to…

3
Life Equip

Educating on pro-life issues

4
Ave Maria Communications

Ave Maria Communications (AMC)employs radio, internet and other media to offer news, analysis, teaching, devotion and music to demonstrate Catholic values.

Religion
5
Matter of Life

The Matter of Life exists to create Gospel-centered documentary films that educate and inspire people about the pro-life vs. pro-choice issue.

6
Catholic Answers Inc

Catholic answers is an apostolate dedicated to serving christ by bringing the fullness of catholic truth to the world. we help good catholics become better catholics, bring former catholics home, and lead non-catholics into the fullness of…

7
Indiana Right to Life Incorporated

To educate the public about abortion

8
Pro-Life Wisconsin Inc

Defend the right to life of all citizens of our state, whether born or preborn, young, old, disabled, or terminally ill. we affirm that the right to life exists at the moment of fertilization and extends until natural death.

9
Life Runners

Prevent abortion by wearing a life-saving message.

Civil Rights
10
Living His Life Abundantly International

To inform, instruct and inspire people through the media about the sacred scriptures and teachings of the roman catholic church

Religion
11
Wisconsin Right to Life Inc

To make euthanasia, infanticide, abortion and destruction of human embryos socially, ethically, and legally unacceptable solutions to human problems and to promote positive alternatives to these acts.

12
Mary's Touch Inc

Religious education through radio programs and media.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Immaculate Heart Media Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rosary Evangelization Apostolate Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VARIOUS CHARITIES — $117,230 · OtherVARIOUS CHARITIESBASILICA OF ST JOSAPHAT — $38,120 · OtherBASILICA OF ST JOSAPHAT+12 more — $42,675 · Other+12 moreIMMACULATE HEART MEDIA INC — $5,500 · ReligionROSARY EVANGELIZATION APOSTOLATE INC — $1,000 · ReligionAugustine Institute Inc — $5,000 · EducationLIFE'S CONNECTION INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC — $3,750 · Arts & CulturePRO-LIFE WISCONSIN EDUCATION TASK FORCE INC — $1,800 · Civil Rights
Other$198,025Religion$6,500Education$5,000Human Services$4,000Arts & Culture$3,750Civil Rights$1,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetIMMACULATE HEART MEDIA INC — $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAugustine Institute Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY LIFE COUNCIL INC — $4,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetLIFE'S CONNECTION INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC — $3,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRO-LIFE WISCONSIN EDUCATION TASK FORCE INC — $1,800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IMMACULATE HEART MEDIA INC
  • Who funds Augustine Institute Inc
  • Who funds FAMILY LIFE COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds LIFE'S CONNECTION INC
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC
  • Who funds PRO-LIFE WISCONSIN EDUCATION TASK FORCE INC
  • Who funds DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER
  • Who funds ROSARY EVANGELIZATION APOSTOLATE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Vankep Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph