Skip to content

· Private foundation

Valentine Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$123kRecreation & Sports$31kYouth Development$15kHousing & Shelter$4kAnimals$1kArts & Culture$800Religion$750Education$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$607k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOCUS ON HOME$3,500
FIELDS & FUTURES$3,000
INFANT CRISIS SERVICES$1,200
THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES$500
MILLWOOD FOUNDATION$500
WES WELKER FOUNDATION$500
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$500
REMERGE$500
GIRL SCOUTS FOR WESTERN OKLAHOMA$500
SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $250 → 16%TO BY FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $47k → 16%TO BY FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $35k → 16%TO BY FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $35k → 16%CLEATS FOR KIDS: $10k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $2k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $1k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $1k → 16%INFANT CRISES SERVICES: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$168k · 11 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$168k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+109%

Still filing today

64%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterAnimalsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CLEATS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2022 · $127k · revenue +37%
  • INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +83%
  • HW
    Humane World for Animals Inc
    2× · 2022–2024 · $1k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • BS
    BOYS SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • OC
    OKLAHOMA CITY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +109%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc

The mission of the okcfjc is to provide protection, hope and healing to those impacted by domestic and family violence in the oklahoma city community. the organization provides a centrally located facility which co-locates and coordinates…

Crime & Legal
2
Peaceful Family Solutions Inc

Peaceful family solutions dba peaceful family oklahoma (pfo) offers free trauma-informed, age-appropriate, evidence-based, hope-centered programs through day camp and school-based models for children aged 4-18. a key component of the…

Human Services
3
Oklahoma Child Care Resource & Referral Association Inc

Our Mission is for all Oklahoma families to have access to quality care and education for their children through community-based resource and referral services; with a vision of Oklahoma communities supporting the development and learning…

—
4
Family Hope House Inc

Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.

Health
5
Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc Dba the Care Center

The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.

Human Services
6
Our Children Oregon

Our children oregon's mission is to be a voice and force for the common good for all oregon children, ensuring all children have the resources and opportunities they need to reach their full potential. we elevate data and the voices of…

Philanthropy
7
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
8
Caring for Kids Inc

Caring for kids, inc. (cfk) is a private, non-profit, full-service adoption and foster care agency operating since 1995. cfk specializes in diverse and inclusive birth parent, foster care, adoption and behavioral health services. our…

Human Services
9
Fostering Sweet Dreams Inc

To provide essential resources to oklahomas most vulnerable children by providing foster families with beds, bedding, carseats, & other furniture.

Human Services
10
Rookie League of Oklahoma

To impact the lives of families in the state of Oklahoma provide educational opportunities for our youth and support the responders of our great state.

—
11
The Parent Child Ctr of Tulsa Inc

To prevent child abuse and neglect through education, treatment, and advocacy. the parent child center of tulsa (pcct) has been serving the tulsa community and surrounding areas since 1990. in 2024, pcct served more than 96,000 infants,…

—
12
First Serve Tulsa Foundation

At First Serve Tulsa, we offer children an opportunity to grow in self-confidence, to enhance their life skills, and to boost their health while learning and enjoying a sport they can play for a lifetime. First Serve Tulsa can be the…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fields & Futures Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEATS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $127,200 · Human ServicesCLEATS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION+2 more: $4,450 · Human ServicesFIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION: $20,200 · Recreation & SportsFIELDS & FUTURES F…WES WELKER FOUNDATION: $8,580 · Recreation & SportsWES WELKER FOUNDAT…BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $3,000 · OtherBOYS SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherTHE FOUNDATION FOR OKC PUB SCH: $800 · OtherFCA: $750 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $500 · OtherMILLWOOD FOUNDATION: $500 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS FOR WESTERN OKLAHOMA: $500 · OtherGIRLS SCOUTS OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA: $500 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AM: $500 · OtherSMART START CENTRAL OKLA: $500 · OtherYMCA: $500 · Other+1 more: $250 · OtherFOCUS ON HOME INC: $3,500 · Housing & ShelterOKLAHOMA CITY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc: $100 · Youth DevelopmentHumane World for Animals Inc: $1,000 · AnimalsREMERGE INC: $750 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$131,650Recreation & Sports$28,780Other$10,300Housing & Shelter$3,500Youth Development$2,100Animals$1,000Crime & Legal$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLEATS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $127,200 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetFIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION: $20,200 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWES WELKER FOUNDATION: $8,580 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $4,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOCUS ON HOME INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREMERGE INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGirl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLEATS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WES WELKER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FOCUS ON HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds REMERGE INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inasmuch FoundationOK22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inasmuch Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · McLaughlin Family Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Fred Jones Family Foundation · Love Meyer Family Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Because We Care Philanthropy Inc · Oge Energy Corp Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Valentine Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Valentine Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 52%
  • Sunbeam Family Services Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Remerge Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Valentine Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Valentine Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Valentine’s filings →

More from the funding graph