Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Uyham Pua Hui Keng and Lim Boon Hai Memorial Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$277k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$170k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$1.5MHealth$380kReligion$24kArts & Culture$19kCommunity Improvement$13kHuman Services$3kInternational$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$300Other$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $37k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $220k
$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ACCOUNT #1108668$170,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$50,000
CHIANG KIA SHEK COLLEGE$36,500
SAINT LOUIS SCHOOL OF SOLINO$6,328
XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL$4,642
THE GEORGIA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS$2,500
DUKE UNIVERSITY$2,000
ATLANTA BALLET$1,500
UCLA DEVELOPMENT$1,000
EMORY UNIVERSITY$1,000
FERNBANK MUSEUM$500
ST MARTIN IN THE FIELDS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$500
AMERICANS FOR OXFORD$500
Individual grant recipient$300
Individual grant recipient$50
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $800) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE FOUNDATION ASSISTING SENIORS: $800 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
MI
NY
NV
IN
PA
CA
KY
VA
KS
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 16 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
21

Total granted

$1.9M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+25%

Still filing today

38%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesAnimalsCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    8× · 2017–2024 · $370k · revenue +202% · 26% of their budget
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2018–2024 · $10k · revenue +41%
  • FI
    Fernbank Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $4k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • TC
    TZU CHI FOUNDATION PHILS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • SL
    SAINT LOUIS SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • CF
    CLCS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

3
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

4
Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges

The association of governing boards of universities and colleges advances higher education as a public good by preparing college, university, and foundation governing boards to fulfill their fiduciary duties and exemplify the highest…

Education
5
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

6
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
9
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ucla Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Ann Children's Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ACCOUNT #1108668 — $1,377,312 · OtherFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ACCOUNT #1108668University of Michigan — $370,000 · OtherUniversity of Michigan+28 more — $181,231 · Other+28 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY — $9,500 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION — $9,000 · EducationAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC — $3,000 · Education+1 more — $100 · EducationATLANTA BALLET INC — $9,000 · Arts & CultureFernbank Inc — $4,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $10 · Arts & CultureTHE GEORGIA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS — $12,500 · Community ImprovementFoundation Assisting Seniors Inc — $800 · Human ServicesPAWS OF HONOR INC — $30 · AnimalsFOUNDATION FOR LIBERTY AND AMERICAN GREATNESS — $10 · Civil RightsANN CHILDREN'S FUND INC — $10 · Health
Other$1,928,543Education$21,600Arts & Culture$13,010Community Improvement$12,500Human Services$800Animals$30Civil Rights$10Health$10

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan — $370,000 over 8y, 26% of budgetTHE GEORGIA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS — $12,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $9,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA BALLET INC — $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFernbank Inc — $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC — $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation Assisting Seniors Inc — $800 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS OF HONOR INC — $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC — $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR LIBERTY AND AMERICAN GREATNESS — $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANN CHILDREN'S FUND INC — $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds THE GEORGIA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ATLANTA BALLET INC
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Fernbank Inc
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC
  • Who funds Foundation Assisting Seniors Inc
  • Who funds THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PAWS OF HONOR INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Uyham Pua Hui Keng and Lim Boon Hai Memorial Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Uyham Pua Hui Keng and Lim Boon Hai Memorial Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Uyham Pua Hui Keng and Lim Boon Hai Memorial Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph