Skip to content
Utah Youth Soccer Association at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Utah Youth Soccer Association

UTAH YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION is the leader in promoting, developing and governing youth soccer in the state of utah.

$397k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$233k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$856kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $383,885, the rows itemized in this filing. The $397,385 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $13,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $131k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $233k
$17,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL OTHER GRANTS UNDER 5000$233,061
UTAH AVALANCHE$26,802
NORTH UTAH COUNTY SOCCER$19,411
SWAT SOCCER$17,479
WEST UNITED SOCCER$17,000
UTAH SOCCER ALLIANCE$17,000
UTAH DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY$17,000
LAROC FUTBOL CLUB$16,500
WEST JORDAN YOUTH SOCCER$9,632
UTAH CELTIC FC$5,000
PROVO ATHLETIC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ELITE FC: $15k → 7%ALL OTHER GRANTS UNDER 5000: $233k → 8%UTAH CELTIC FC: $5k → 8%SUMMIT FC: $30k → 9%SEE ATTACHED LIST: $170k → 8%CELTIC STORM SOCCER CLUB: $15k → 8%META SPORT FC: $10k → 9%SEE ATTACHED OVERFLOW SHEET: $102k → 8%PROVO ATHLETIC: $5k → 8%OGDEN SOCCER: $10k → 9%BLUE KNIGHTS SOCCER CLUB: $6k → 8%SARATOGA SPRINGS FC: $11k → 8%OGDEN SOCCER: $4k → 9%WEST JORDAN YOUTH SOCCER: $10k → 8%NORTH UTAH COUNTY SOCCER: $19k → 8%LAROCA FC: $38k → 9%UTAH GLORY: $4k → 8%UTAH SURF: $11k → 8%LA ROCA FUTBOL CLUB: $36k → 9%UTAH AVALANCHE: $37k → 8%UTAH ATHLETIC ACADEMY: $9k → 8%LAROC FUTBOL CLUB: $17k → 9%UTAH AVALANCHE: $27k → 8%WASATCH SC: $12k → 9%UTAH AVALANCHE: $27k → 8%UTAH SOCCER ALLIANCE: $17k → 8%WEST UNITED SOCCER: $17k → 8%MURRAY SOCCER CLUB: $2k → 8%UTAH SOCCER ALLIANCE: $25k → 8%SPARTA UNITED: $7k → 8%SWAT SOCCER: $17k → 8%ELITE ACADEMY: $10k → 8%7 ELITE ACADEMY: $9k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$609k · 9 repeat orgs$145k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$609k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+17%

Still filing today

89%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LR
    La Roca Futbol Club
    3× · 2022–2024 · $91k · revenue +88%
  • UA
    UTAH AVALANCHE GIRLS SOCCER CLUB FO
    3× · 2022–2024 · $90k · revenue +32%
  • AA
    Arsenal Alliance Soccer Club
    2× · 2022–2024 · $42k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • SE
    STANSBURY ELITE SOCCER CLUB INC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • WT
    WASATCH THUNDER YOUTH ATHLETICS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +9%
  • CC
    COLOR COUNTRY FUTBOL CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sugar City Soccer League
Recreation & Sports
2
Weatherford Soccer Club Inc
Recreation & Sports
3
Wauconda Area Youth Soccer Club

Provide recreational soccer for children 3-14

Recreation & Sports
4
Kingman Youth Soccer League

To foster the physical, mental, and emotional growth and development of the greater kingman, arizona area youth through the sport of soccer at all levels of age and competition

Recreation & Sports
5
Cold Spring Area Soccer Club
—
6
Dynamo Fc Utah Surf

To provide soccer camps, training and opportunities to all children in north utah county.

—
7
Hueytown Youth Soccer Club Inc
—
8
International Soccer Club
Recreation & Sports
9
Usc - United Soccer Clubs

The mission of the United Soccer Clubs (USC) is to provide an exceptional platform for youth soccer in South Texas. We aim to elevate the game of soccer by fostering player, coach, and referee development, promoting parent education,…

Recreation & Sports
10
Antelope Valley Futbol Club

A soccer league to promote youth development in soccer

Recreation & Sports
11
North Shore United Soccer Club Inc

Recreation Youth Soccer

Recreation & Sports
12
South Kitsap Soccer Club

Youth soccer club

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Soccer Alliance Recreation Dba Copper Mountain Soccer Competition; the most unlike its peers is Utah Swat Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

La Roca Futbol Club: $90,710 · Recreation & SportsLa Roca Futbol ClubUTAH AVALANCHE GIRLS SOCCER CLUB FO: $90,363 · Recreation & SportsUTAH AVALANCHE GIRLS SOCCER CLUB FOArsenal Alliance Soccer Club: $41,655 · Recreation & SportsArsenal Alliance Soccer ClubLeague 30 UYSA: $39,558 · Recreation & SportsLeague 30 UYSACeltic Storm Soccer Club: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsRED SLOPES SOCCER FOUNDATION: $18,800 · Recreation & SportsUTAH SOCCER ALLIANCE RECREATION DBA COPPER MOUNTAIN SOCCER COMPETITION: $17,000 · Recreation & SportsOGDEN SOCCER: $13,600 · Recreation & Sports+8 more: $61,722 · Recreation & Sports+8 moreUTAH YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $233,061 · OtherUTAH YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATIONASSOCIATION OF NORTH UTAH COUNTY SOCCER: $19,411 · OtherASSOCIATION OF NORTH UTAH COUNTY SOCCERUTAH SWAT INC: $17,479 · OtherUTAH SWAT INCSTANSBURY ELITE SOCCER CLUB INC: $15,000 · Other+2 more: $13,930 · OtherUTAH DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY: $61,220 · Youth DevelopmentUTAH DEVE…
Recreation & Sports$393,408Other$298,881Youth Development$61,220

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUTAH YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $233,061 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetLa Roca Futbol Club: $90,710 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetUTAH AVALANCHE GIRLS SOCCER CLUB FO: $90,363 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetUTAH DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY: $61,220 over 2y, 16% of budgetArsenal Alliance Soccer Club: $41,655 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetLeague 30 UYSA: $39,558 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetCeltic Storm Soccer Club: $20,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetRED SLOPES SOCCER FOUNDATION: $18,800 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetUTAH SOCCER ALLIANCE RECREATION DBA COPPER MOUNTAIN SOCCER COMPETITION: $17,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetOGDEN SOCCER: $13,600 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetWASATCH THUNDER YOUTH ATHLETICS INC: $11,700 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOLOR COUNTRY FUTBOL CLUB: $10,500 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetSARATOGA SPRINGS FC: $10,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWEST JORDAN YOUTH SOCCER LEAGUE: $9,632 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetSparta United Soccer Club: $7,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBLUE KNIGHTS SOCCER CLUB: $6,390 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetUTAH GLORY SOCCER CLUB: $4,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMURRAY MAX SOCCER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE3.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Utah Youth Soccer Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Utah Youth Soccer Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Utah Youth Soccer Association?

    Find your warmest path to Utah Youth Soccer Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Utah Youth Soccer Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home