Skip to content
Utah Clean Air Partnership Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Utah Clean Air Partnership Inc

Ucair educates and empowers individuals, businesses, and community leaders to make changes that collectively improve air quality, supporting a stronger economy, better health, and overall quality of life.

$259k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$1.0MCommunity Improvement$476kEducation$158kPublic Benefit$144kHealth$80kHuman Services$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $115,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $259,439 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $144,439 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$471k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UTAH CLEAN ENERGY$20,000
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS$20,000
CITY OF LOGAN$20,000
PROJECT READ$20,000
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY$15,000
WESTMINISTER UNIVERSITY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PARK CITY MUNICIPALS: $20k → 5%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $29k → 8%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $49k → 12%ICAST: $25k → 7%DAVIS COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $20k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $22k → 8%UTAH MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY: $20k → 8%ICAST: $25k → 7%DAVIS COUNTY: $20k → 6%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 12%TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE FOUNDATION: $20k → 7%CITY OF LOGAN: $23k → 12%GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF ENERGY DEVELOPMENT: $50k → 8%MAPLE MOUNTAIN FIREPLACE: $24k → 8%CITY OF LOGAN: $20k → 12%UTAH CLEAN CITIES COALITION: $30k → 8%WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 9%UTAH CLEAN CITIES COALITION: $25k → 8%WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 9%GREENBIKE: $25k → 8%WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 9%SALT LAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $20k → 8%SALT LAKE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $20k → 8%PROJECT READ: $20k → 8%SALT LAKE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $20k → 8%SALT LAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $20k → 8%UTAH CLEAN ENERGY: $20k → 8%UINTAH COUNTY: $22k → 9%UTAH FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%SALT LAKE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $20k → 8%BREATHE UTAH: $25k → 8%BLUE PLANET LAWN: $20k → 8%SANDY CITY: $25k → 8%UTAH CLEAN ENERGY: $25k → 8%UTAH CLEAN ENERGY: $23k → 8%UTAH CLEAN ENERGY: $23k → 8%UTAH DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS: $20k → 8%UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY: $25k → 8%UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY: $25k → 8%IDLE FREE HEAT LLC: $30k → 8%IDLE FREE HEAT LLC: $23k → 8%LEADERS FOR CLEAN AIR: $25k → 8%LEADERS FOR CLEAN AIR: $20k → 8%GIV COMMUNITIES: $29k → 8%UTAH FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%UTAH OFFICE OF ENERGY DEVELOPMENT: $20k → 8%SALT LAKE COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $25k → 8%LEADERS FOR CLEAN AIR: $25k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 19 repeat orgs$745k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
44

Total granted

$1.2M
$695k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+2%

Still filing today

37%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $131k · revenue +76%
  • LF
    LEADERS FOR CLEAN AIR
    5× · 2017–2022 · $110k · revenue +165%
  • UC
    UTAH CLEAN CITIES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $55k · revenue +278%

Funded once

  • SO
    STATE OF UTAH GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • GC
    GIV COMMUNITIESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $29k · revenue +42%
  • SC
    SANDY CITY
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Valley Chamber of Commerce

Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.

—
2
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
3
Utah Clean Air Partnership Inc

Ucair educates and empowers individuals, businesses, and community leaders to make changes that collectively improve air quality, supporting a stronger economy, better health, and overall quality of life.

Environment
4
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
5
Utah Energy Conservation Coalition Inc
Education
6
Economic Development Corporation of Utah Foundation

To serve as a catalyst for quality job growth and increased capital investment in the state.

Community Improvement
7
Utah Geological Foundation
—
8
Fresh Energy

Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.

Environment
9
Economic Development Corp of Utah

Economic development corporation of utah (edcutah) serves as a catalyst for quality job growth and increased capital investment by assisting in-state companies to grow and recruiting out-of-state companies to expand and relocate into utah.

Community Improvement
10
O2 Utah Foundation

The o2 utah foundation is an environmental nonprofit dedicated to a greener utah.

—
11
Envision Utah

Envision Utah is a nonpartisan public-private partnership that engages people to create and sustain communities that are beautiful, prosperous, healthy, and neighborly for current and future residents.

Community Improvement
12
Utah Land Use Institute

To assist governmental units, developers and the public with land use issues.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Icast. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Utah Chamber: $100,000 · OtherUtah ChamberWEBER STATE UNIVERSITY: $93,250 · OtherWEBER STATE UNIVERSITYUTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $89,426 · OtherUTAH STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $65,378 · OtherUTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY: $65,000 · OtherCITY OF LOGAN: $55,809 · OtherIDLE FREE HEAT LLC: $52,500 · OtherSTATE OF UTAH GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $50,000 · OtherDAVIS COUNTY GOVERNMENT: $50,000 · OtherGREENBIKE: $50,000 · Other+45 more: $706,503 · Other+45 moreUTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC: $131,000 · EnvironmentUTAH CLEAN ENERG…LEADERS FOR CLEAN AIR: $110,000 · EnvironmentLEADERS FOR CLEA…BREATHE UTAH: $25,000 · EnvironmentBREATHE UTAHTriple Bottom Line Foundation: $20,000 · EnvironmentTriple Bottom Li…UTAH FOUNDATION: $55,000 · Public BenefitSLC BIKE SHARE: $40,000 · Public BenefitUTAH CLEAN CITIES: $55,000 · EducationProject Read: $20,000 · EducationWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationICAST: $50,000 · Community ImprovementGIV COMMUNITIES: $28,800 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,377,866Environment$286,000Public Benefit$95,000Education$85,000Community Improvement$50,000Recreation & Sports$28,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC: $131,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetLEADERS FOR CLEAN AIR: $110,000 over 5y, 22% of budgetUtah Chamber: $100,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUTAH FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetUTAH CLEAN CITIES: $55,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetICAST: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSLC BIKE SHARE: $40,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetGIV COMMUNITIES: $28,800 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetSALT LAKE COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREATHE UTAH: $25,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetProject Read: $20,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetTriple Bottom Line Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPrinting Industries of America Foundation: $7,180 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEADERS FOR CLEAN AIR ↗
  • Who funds Utah Chamber ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UTAH CLEAN CITIES ↗
  • Who funds ICAST ↗
  • Who funds SLC BIKE SHARE ↗
  • Who funds GIV COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds SALT LAKE COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds BREATHE UTAH ↗
  • Who funds Project Read ↗
  • Who funds Triple Bottom Line Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ihc Health Services I…Amazonsmile Foundation
Ihc Health Services IncUT15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ihc Health Services Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Utah Clean Air Partnership Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Utah Clean Air Partnership Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Utah Clean Air Partnership’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home