Skip to content
Utah Association of Family Support Centers Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Utah Association of Family Support Centers Inc

The mission of the fscu is to strengthen utah families one community at a time by supporting parents, protecting children, and preserving families.

$2.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$542k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$7.1MPublic Benefit$111kEnvironment$111k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k7 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.7M
$189,560
Median grant
1
States reached
$747k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE FAMILY PLACE$542,325
FAMILY SUPPORT OF SALT LAKE CITY$436,105
UTAH VALEY FAMILY SUPPORT$364,125
FAMILY SUPPORT OF SOUTHWESTERN UTAH$311,025
FAMILY SUPPORT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$190,485
FAMILY SUPPORT OF OGDEN$189,560
BOX ELDER$186,695
FAMLIY SUPPORT OF UINTAH BASIN$169,184
OPEN DOORS$155,295
GRAND COUNTY$110,874
CARBON COUNTY$110,733
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $3.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FAMILY SUPPORT OF SALT LAKE CITY: $498k → 8%BOX ELDER: $218k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT OF OGDEN: $190k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $190k → 10%FAMILY SUPPORT OF SOUTHWESTERN UTAH: $311k → 13%FAMILY SUPPORT OF SALT LAKE CITY: $436k → 8%BOX ELDER: $187k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT OF OGDEN: $178k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $165k → 10%FAMILY SUPPORT OF SOUTHWESTERN UTAH: $286k → 13%FAMILY SUPPORT OF SALT LAKE CITY: $423k → 8%BOX ELDER: $150k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT OF OGDEN: $107k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $112k → 10%FAMILY SUPPORT OF SOUTHWESTERN UTAH: $183k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.4M · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$7.4M
$0

Still filing today

82%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UV
    Utah Valley Family Support Center Inc
    3× · 2022–2025 · $893k · revenue +23%
  • FS
    FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF SOUTHWESTERN UTAH
    3× · 2022–2025 · $781k · revenue +11% · 36% of their budget
  • BE
    BOX ELDER FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER
    3× · 2022–2025 · $554k · revenue +23% · 59% of their budget

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Utah Association of Family Support Centers Inc

    The mission of the fscu is to strengthen utah families one community at a time by supporting parents, protecting children, and preserving families. to accomplish this mission, each family support center provides its clients with a 24-hour…

    —
    2
    Childrens Crisis Center of Stanislaus County

    Child abuse prevention

    Crime & Legal
    3
    Family Nurturing Center of Kentucky

    The mission of Family Nurturing Center is to end the cycle of child abuse by promoting individual well-being and healthy family relationships. We envision a world with safe children, thriving families and nurturing communities and offer a…

    —
    4
    Family Saver Center

    Family Counseling & Education

    Human Services
    5
    Family Crisis Center Inc

    The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

    Human Services
    6
    Iris Family Support Center Inc

    Iris family support center, formerly known as scan, protects children, prepares parents, strengthens families and educates our community to stop child abuse and neglect.

    Human Services
    7
    Family Foundations Counseling Services

    The mission of Family Foundations Counseling Services is to prevent child abuse and neglect, to ensure the wellbeing of every child and youth we serve, and to aid in building strong resilient families.

    Health
    8
    Treasure Valley Children's Relief Nurser

    The organization's mission is to prevent child abuse and neglect by strengthening at-risk families using proven interventions. Using the relief nursery model TVCRN signficantly reduces the likelihood of child maltreatment by reducing the…

    Human Services
    9
    Okmulgee County Family Resource Ctr

    Crisis intervention services and full shelter for victims and their children of domestic violence/sexual assault. Advocates for abused children in the court system.

    Human Services
    10
    Family Services Inc

    To strengthen the well-being and development of families and individuals through professional human services programs, including therapy, counseling, education, special assistance, and advocacy.

    Human Services
    11
    House of Hope

    Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

    —
    12
    Family Dynamics Resource Center

    To reduce incidences of child maltreatment through positive parent education and interventions to help strengthen the bonds between parents and children.

    Human Services
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Support Center; the most unlike its peers is Family Support Center of the Uintah Basin Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    6
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    6/9
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $1,357,139 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT CENTERFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF SOUTHWESTERN UTAH: $780,572 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF SOUTHWESTERN UTAHBOX ELDER FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $554,092 · Human ServicesBOX ELDER FAMILY SUPPORT CENTERFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF OGDEN INC: $474,545 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF OGDEN INCFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF WASHINGTON CO: $467,955 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF WASHINGTON COTHE FAMILY PLACE UTAH FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHILD & FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF CACHE: $1,390,841 · OtherTHE FAMILY PLACE UTAH FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHILD & FA…Utah Valley Family Support Center Inc: $892,555 · OtherUtah Valley Family Support Center IncFamily Support Center of the Uintah Basin Inc: $422,777 · OtherFamily Support Center of the Uintah Basin IncGRAND COUNTY: $292,526 · OtherGRAND COUNTYCARBON COUNTY: $291,441 · OtherCARBON COUNTYTHE FAMILY CONNECTION CENTER INC DBA OPEN DOORS SOCIAL SERVICES: $431,666 · Crime & Legal
    Human Services$3,634,303Other$3,290,140Crime & Legal$431,666

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FAMILY PLACE UTAH FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHILD & FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF CACHE: $1,390,841 over 3y, 16% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $1,357,139 over 3y, 29% of budgetUtah Valley Family Support Center Inc: $892,555 over 3y, 21% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF SOUTHWESTERN UTAH: $780,572 over 3y, 36% of budgetBOX ELDER FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $554,092 over 3y, 59% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF OGDEN INC: $474,545 over 3y, 31% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF WASHINGTON CO: $467,955 over 3y, 44% of budgetTHE FAMILY CONNECTION CENTER INC DBA OPEN DOORS SOCIAL SERVICES: $431,666 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetFamily Support Center of the Uintah Basin Inc: $422,777 over 3y, 51% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Sorenson Legacy Found…Dominion Energy Chari…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
    Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Utah Association of Family Support Centers Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Utah Association of Family Support Centers Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Utah Association of Family Support Centers Inc?

      Find your warmest path to Utah Association of Family Support Centers Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Utah Association of Family Support Centers’ filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home