Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Utah Association of Family Support Centers Inc

The mission of the fscu is to strengthen utah families one community at a time by supporting parents, protecting children, and preserving families.

$2.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$542k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of UTAH ASSOCIATION OF FAMILY SUPPORT CENTERS INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k7 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.7M
$189,560
Median grant
1
States reached
$747k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE FAMILY PLACE$542,325
FAMILY SUPPORT OF SALT LAKE CITY$436,105
UTAH VALEY FAMILY SUPPORT$364,125
FAMILY SUPPORT OF SOUTHWESTERN UTAH$311,025
FAMILY SUPPORT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$190,485
FAMILY SUPPORT OF OGDEN$189,560
BOX ELDER$186,695
FAMLIY SUPPORT OF UINTAH BASIN$169,184
OPEN DOORS$155,295
GRAND COUNTY$110,874
CARBON COUNTY$110,733
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $3.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FAMILY SUPPORT OF SALT LAKE CITY: $498k → 8%BOX ELDER: $218k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT OF OGDEN: $190k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $190k → 10%FAMILY SUPPORT OF SOUTHWESTERN UTAH: $311k → 13%FAMILY SUPPORT OF SALT LAKE CITY: $436k → 8%BOX ELDER: $187k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT OF OGDEN: $178k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $165k → 10%FAMILY SUPPORT OF SOUTHWESTERN UTAH: $286k → 13%FAMILY SUPPORT OF SALT LAKE CITY: $423k → 8%BOX ELDER: $150k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT OF OGDEN: $107k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $112k → 10%FAMILY SUPPORT OF SOUTHWESTERN UTAH: $183k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.4M · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$7.4M
$0

Still filing today

82%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UV
    Utah Valley Family Support Center Inc
    3× · 2022–2025 · $893k · revenue +23%
  • FS
    FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF SOUTHWESTERN UTAH
    3× · 2022–2025 · $781k · revenue +11% · 36% of their budget
  • BE
    BOX ELDER FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER
    3× · 2022–2025 · $554k · revenue +23% · 59% of their budget

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Utah Association of Family Support Centers Inc

    The mission of the fscu is to strengthen utah families one community at a time by supporting parents, protecting children, and preserving families. to accomplish this mission, each family support center provides its clients with a 24-hour…

    2
    Childrens Crisis Center of Stanislaus County

    Child abuse prevention

    Crime & Legal
    3
    Family Nurturing Center of Kentucky

    The mission of Family Nurturing Center is to end the cycle of child abuse by promoting individual well-being and healthy family relationships. We envision a world with safe children, thriving families and nurturing communities and offer a…

    4
    Family Saver Center

    Family Counseling & Education

    Human Services
    5
    Family Crisis Center Inc

    The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

    Human Services
    6
    Iris Family Support Center Inc

    Iris family support center, formerly known as scan, protects children, prepares parents, strengthens families and educates our community to stop child abuse and neglect.

    Human Services
    7
    Family Foundations Counseling Services

    The mission of Family Foundations Counseling Services is to prevent child abuse and neglect, to ensure the wellbeing of every child and youth we serve, and to aid in building strong resilient families.

    Health
    8
    Treasure Valley Children's Relief Nurser

    The organization's mission is to prevent child abuse and neglect by strengthening at-risk families using proven interventions. Using the relief nursery model TVCRN signficantly reduces the likelihood of child maltreatment by reducing the…

    Human Services
    9
    Okmulgee County Family Resource Ctr

    Crisis intervention services and full shelter for victims and their children of domestic violence/sexual assault. Advocates for abused children in the court system.

    Human Services
    10
    Family Services Inc

    To strengthen the well-being and development of families and individuals through professional human services programs, including therapy, counseling, education, special assistance, and advocacy.

    Human Services
    11
    House of Hope

    Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

    12
    Family Dynamics Resource Center

    To reduce incidences of child maltreatment through positive parent education and interventions to help strengthen the bonds between parents and children.

    Human Services

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Support Center and the most unlike its peers is Family Support Center of the Uintah Basin Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    6
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    6/9
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER — $1,357,139 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT CENTERFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF SOUTHWESTERN UTAH — $780,572 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF SOUTHWESTERN UTAHBOX ELDER FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER — $554,092 · Human ServicesBOX ELDER FAMILY SUPPORT CENTERFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF OGDEN INC — $474,545 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF OGDEN INCFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF WASHINGTON CO — $467,955 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF WASHINGTON COTHE FAMILY PLACE UTAH FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHILD & FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF CACHE — $1,390,841 · OtherTHE FAMILY PLACE UTAH FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHILD & FA…Utah Valley Family Support Center Inc — $892,555 · OtherUtah Valley Family Support Center IncFamily Support Center of the Uintah Basin Inc — $422,777 · OtherFamily Support Center of the Uintah Basin IncGRAND COUNTY — $292,526 · OtherGRAND COUNTYCARBON COUNTY — $291,441 · OtherCARBON COUNTYTHE FAMILY CONNECTION CENTER INC DBA OPEN DOORS SOCIAL SERVICES — $431,666 · Crime & Legal
    Human Services$3,634,303Other$3,290,140Crime & Legal$431,666

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE FAMILY PLACE UTAH FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHILD & FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF CACHE — $1,390,841 over 3y, 16% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER — $1,357,139 over 3y, 29% of budgetUtah Valley Family Support Center Inc — $892,555 over 3y, 21% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF SOUTHWESTERN UTAH — $780,572 over 3y, 36% of budgetBOX ELDER FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER — $554,092 over 3y, 59% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF OGDEN INC — $474,545 over 3y, 31% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF WASHINGTON CO — $467,955 over 3y, 44% of budgetTHE FAMILY CONNECTION CENTER INC DBA OPEN DOORS SOCIAL SERVICES — $431,666 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetFamily Support Center of the Uintah Basin Inc — $422,777 over 3y, 51% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Utah Association of Family Support Centers Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2025
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Utah Association of Family Support Centers Inc?

      Find your warmest path to Utah Association of Family Support Centers Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph