Skip to content
USA Boxing Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

USA Boxing Inc

The corporation is the national governing body for amateur boxing and is responsible for the promotion and development of amateur boxing in the united states.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$326k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Health$596kRecreation & Sports$342kHuman Services$11k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $868,963, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,157,592 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $288,629 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $211k
  • $250k+2 grants · $596k
$24,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCULSKY HEALTH FORCE LLC$325,713
ASCP FOUNDATION$270,000
USA FENCING$118,000
USA CURLING$93,000
USA JUDO$24,000
USA BOXING - ILLINOIS$12,000
LOWELL SUN CHARITIES$10,500
USA BOXING - MISSOURI VALLEY$10,500
UNITED STATES INTERCOLLEGIATE BOXING ASSN INC$5,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 30% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LOWELL SUN CHARITIES: $11k → 8%USA CURLING: $93k → 6%USA BOXING - MISSOURI VALLEY: $11k → 8%USA FENCING: $118k → 9%USA BOXING - ILLINOIS: $12k → 14%ASCP FOUNDATION: $270k → 9%MCULSKY HEALTH FORCE LLC: $326k → 8%UNITED STATES INTERCOLLEGIATE BOXING ASSN INC: $5k → 15%USA CURLING: $39k → 6%USA FENCING: $19k → 9%USA JUDO: $24k → 9%USA JUDO: $21k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$314k · 3 repeat orgs$634k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$314k
$634k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
0%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $634k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Recreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    United States Fencing Association
    2× · 2023–2024 · $137k · revenue +29%
  • US
    UNITED STATES CURLING ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $132k · revenue -10%
  • US
    United States Judo Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $45k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • MH
    MCULSKY HEALTH FORCE LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $326k
  • AS
    American Society of Consultant Pharmacists Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $270k · revenue 0%
  • UB
    USA BOXING ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MCULSKY HEALTH FORCE LLC: $325,713 · OtherMCULSKY HEALTH FORCE LLCAmerican Society of Consultant Pharmacists Foundation: $270,000 · OtherAmerican Society of Consultant Pharmacists Foundation+1 more: $10,500 · OtherUnited States Fencing Association: $137,000 · Recreation & SportsUnited States Fencing AssociationUNITED STATES CURLING ASSOCIATION: $132,000 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES CURLING ASSOCIATIONUnited States Judo Inc: $45,370 · Recreation & SportsUnited States Judo IncUSA BOXING ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION: $12,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $5,250 · Recreation & SportsLOWELL SUN CHARITIES INC: $10,500 · Philanthropy
Other$606,213Recreation & Sports$331,620Philanthropy$10,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited States Fencing Association: $137,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED STATES CURLING ASSOCIATION: $132,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetUnited States Judo Inc: $45,370 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLOWELL SUN CHARITIES INC: $10,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization USA Boxing Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from USA Boxing Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on USA Boxing’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home