Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Urology Care Foundation Inc

We support, through philanthropic efforts, the improvement of urological care globally by funding research, clinical education, patient education, and humanitarian programs.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$225k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$6.7MEducation$5.1MScience & Tech$305kYouth Development$46k
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 30 grants below total $1,029,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,328,123 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $298,623 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k25 grants · $545k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $485k
$20,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$96M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATION & RESEARCH INC$225,000
UNIV OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN$80,000
CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CTR$60,000
UNIV OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE$60,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$60,000
MOFFITT CANCER CENTER$40,000
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY$40,000
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$40,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL$40,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$24,500
EMORY UNIVERSITY$20,000
BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MED CTR$20,000
RESEARCH INSTITUTE NATIONWIDE$20,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING$20,000
UCLA DAVID GEFFEN SCHOOL MED$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $40k → 15%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSP: $40k → 8%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $40k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $40k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $90k → 11%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $40k → 8%UNIV OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE: $60k → 10%UNIV OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $80k → 14%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MED CTR: $40k → 17%UNIV TEXAS HSC SAN ANTONIO: $40k → 16%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $80k → 16%CHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER (WDC): $40k → 14%MOFFITT CANCER CENTER: $40k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI: $70k → 15%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $75k → 14%UNIV OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $80k → 16%WASHINGTON UNIV SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $40k → 21%UNIV OF CT HEALTH CENTER: $40k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $40k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $52k → 10%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $40k → 16%AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC: $1.3M → 6%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $80k → 11%UNIV OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $60k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI: $60k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL: $75k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $46k → 10%AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATION & RESEARCH INC: $225k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $60k → 11%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $60k → 14%UNIV OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN: $80k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $60k → 14%AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC: $219k → 6%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $58k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY FEINBERG: $50k → 14%AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC: $216k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $58k → 14%AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATION & RESEARCH INC: $195k → 6%WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE: $80k → 17%AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATION & RESEARCH INC: $195k → 6%WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE: $60k → 17%AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC: $185k → 6%AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC: $170k → 6%AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC: $134k → 6%SIMER SOLUTIONS INC: $46k → 14%CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CTR: $70k → 14%CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CTR: $60k → 14%CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CTR: $60k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
MD
AZ
KS
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 54 repeat orgs$553k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

54 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 36 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
17

Total granted

$11M
$393k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+37%

Still filing today

44%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $160k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +32%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $370k · revenue +63%
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    7× · 2017–2025 · $350k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • SS
    SIMER SOLUTIONS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $46k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
  • CANDIDgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $40k · revenue +38%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
2
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
5
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
6
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
7
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
8
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
9
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
12
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University Hospitals Health System Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community College Foundatio…Cancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 64 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%64%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%5%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr16%78%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/83
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,482

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/45
Grantees still filing
40/45
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $509,500 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $450,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIATHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE — $400,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENT…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $290,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOWeill Medical College of Cornell Univers — $280,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $250,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $220,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA — $204,500 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $200,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM — $200,000 · OtherUTMD ANDERSON — $200,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO — $191,000 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS — $180,000 · Other+27 more — $1,786,000 · Other+27 moreAMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC — $2,809,459 · HealthAMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATIO…CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $369,979 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTERTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $220,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation — $180,000 · HealthH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $180,000 · Health+14 more — $570,000 · Health+14 moreUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $350,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBU…DUKE UNIVERSITY — $260,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYUniversity of Miami — $250,000 · EducationUniversity of MiamiJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $220,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERS…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $200,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUM…Baylor College of Medicine — $180,000 · EducationBaylor College of Med…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $170,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES…UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · EducationNew York University — $80,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $80,000 · Education+11 more — $337,200 · Education+11 moreNorthwestern University — $160,000 · Recreation & SportsCANDID — $40,000 · Philanthropy
Other$5,361,000Health$4,329,438Education$2,327,200Recreation & Sports$160,000Philanthropy$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC — $2,809,459 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $369,979 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $350,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $260,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $250,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $220,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $220,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $200,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $180,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $180,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $180,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $170,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $160,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $120,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center — $90,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH — $80,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetNew York University — $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAlbert Einstein College of Medicine — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANDID — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFox Chase Cancer Center Medical GroupIn — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Institute For Cancer Research — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $7,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS UNIVERSITY UROLOGIC SURGERY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Cancer Socie…American Heart Associ…Johns Hopkins Univers…National Alliance for…Cystic Fibrosis Found…Vanderbilt University…Mayo ClinicYale UniversityAmerican Urological A…Conquer Cancer Founda…Hyundai Hope on WheelsAlzheimer's Disease &…
American Cancer Society IncGA21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Johns Hopkins University · National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression · Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Mayo Clinic · Yale University · American Urological Association Education and Research Inc · Conquer Cancer Foundation of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · Hyundai Hope on Wheels · Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Urology Care Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • American Foundation for Biological Research — 27% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • American Urological Association Education and Research Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines