Skip to content

· Private foundation

Uriel Charitable Foundation

SUPPORTS THE MISSION OF UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK, INC., (UJA-FEDERATION OF NEW YORK).

$82k
Granted FY2023
17
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0166% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Religion$84kEducation$63kHealth$11kHuman Services$4kPhilanthropy$1kArts & Culture$500Other$0
02FY2023 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k15 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $51k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION AHAVATH TORAH$30,000
SINAI SCHOOLS$21,250
VARIOUS$3,719
THE MORIAH SCHOOL$3,600
EMUNAH WOMEN$3,600
EAST HILL SYNAGOGUE$3,170
AMERICAN FRIENDS MIGDAL OHR$2,860
EZER MIZION$2,770
Individual grant recipient$2,500
PROJECT EZRA$1,800
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BRIS AVROHOM$1,000
SHARSHERET$1,000
UNION OF ORTHODOX JEWISH CONF$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $860) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $860 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$179k · 12 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$179k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+23%

Still filing today

33%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
EducationHealthInternationalReligionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EM
    EZER MIZION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $7k · revenue +35%
  • MS
    MORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD
    2× · 2022–2023 · $6k · revenue +21%
  • CL
    CHAI LIFELINE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +19%
  • ET
    ENGLEWOOD TORAH CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $613
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Yotzer Ohr Inc

Our school is run on a system of mutual respect, for teachers, administration and students. in a warm and caring environment, full of creativity and multi-faceted approaches to education, we ignite a spark in each girl to love hashem and…

Education
5
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
6
Ezreinu Inc
Health
7
Zicron Eliyahu Inc
—
8
Nefesh Chaim Inc
Religion
9
Yeshiva Birkat Israel Inc

Education services

Religion
10
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
11
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chai Lifeline Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Friendship Circle Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION AHAVATH TORAH: $75,000 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVATH TORAHSINAI SCHOOLS: $56,250 · OtherSINAI SCHOOLSEMUNAH WOMEN: $10,400 · OtherEMUNAH WOMEN+13 more: $27,608 · Other+13 moreEZER MIZION: $6,990 · InternationalMORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD: $6,325 · EducationYeshivas Hagram Soloveitchik Inc: $360 · EducationCHAI LIFELINE INC: $2,000 · HealthSharsheret Inc: $1,980 · HealthBRIS AVROHOM INC: $2,000 · ReligionUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $860 · Human Services
Other$169,258International$6,990Education$6,685Health$3,980Religion$2,000Philanthropy$1,000Human Services$860

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEZER MIZION: $6,990 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD: $6,325 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $1,980 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $860 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYeshivas Hagram Soloveitchik Inc: $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EZER MIZION ↗
  • Who funds MORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD ↗
  • Who funds BRIS AVROHOM INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds Sharsheret Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Yeshivas Hagram Soloveitchik Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Alan and Elisa Pines Family Foundation Inc · The Keren Yitzchak Foundation Inc · The Lee and Cheryl Lasher Family Foundation Inc · The Daniel E and Joyce G Straus Family Foundation · David & Esther Muschel Foundation · Cross River Community Foundation · Fjc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Uriel Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Uriel Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Uriel Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Uriel Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $90k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Uriel’s filings →

More from the funding graph