Skip to content

· Public charity

University of Illinois Community Credit Union

To assist our members in the management of their financial well-being by providing loans, savings accounts and other financial services in a friendly and professional manner.

$367k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$289k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$2.3MEducation$49kArts & Culture$33kPhilanthropy$22kPublic Safety & Disaster$10k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $311,700, the rows itemized in this filing. The $367,326 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $55,626 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $250k+1 grant · $289k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$756M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS$289,200
COMMUNITY IMPACT FUND$10,000
VILLAGE OF MAHOMET$6,500
UNITED WAY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMMUNITY IMPACT FUND: $10k → 8%ALLERTON PARK & RETREAT CENTER: $15k → 7%ICON COLLECTIVE: $6k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $335k → 19%ALLERTON PARK & RETREAT CENTER: $8k → 7%ICON COLLECTIVE: $6k → 14%University of Illinois Urbana Champaign: $328k → 19%ALLERTON PARK AND RETREAT CENTER: $8k → 7%University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign: $325k → 19%University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign: $7k → 7%University of Illinois Urbana Champaign: $325k → 19%University of Illinois Urbana Champaign: $7k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS DIVISION OF INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS: $266k → 19%University of Illinois Urbana Champaign: $7k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS DIA: $260k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS DIA: $260k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS DIA: $195k → 19%UNITED WAY: $12k → 19%VISIT CHAMPAIGN COUNTY FOUNDATION: $10k → 19%Illinois Fire Service Institute: $10k → 19%UNITED WAY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY: $6k → 19%THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $289k → 19%KRANNERT CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $13k → 19%KRANNERT CENTER: $10k → 19%VILLAGE OF MAHOMET: $7k → 19%PARKLAND COLLEGE: $5k → 19%KRANNERT CENTER: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 63% of University of Illinois Community Credit Union’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

University of Illinois Community Credit Unionlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 3 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$2.7M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+150%

Still filing today

33%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.7M
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY
    2× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +16%
  • IC
    ICON COLLECTIVE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $12k

Funded once

  • WP
    Wolf Pack Sports Properties LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • VC
    VISIT CHAMPAIGN COUNTY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +150%
  • PC
    PARKLAND COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $2,676,895 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS+4 more: $44,262 · OtherUNITED WAY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY: $18,000 · PhilanthropyVISIT CHAMPAIGN COUNTY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyThe Community Impact Fund: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,721,157Philanthropy$38,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY: $18,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVISIT CHAMPAIGN COUNTY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetThe Community Impact Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ICON COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds VISIT CHAMPAIGN COUNTY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Community Impact Fund ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization University of Illinois Community Credit Union funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from University of Illinois Community Credit Union. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on University of Illinois Community Credit Union’s filings →

    More from the funding graph