Loading…
· Public charity
UNIVERSITY AREA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
The university area cdc's neighborhood transformation strategy (nts) follows a community development model that effectively supports university area residents by implementing nine initiatives aimed at improving their economic and social conditions.
$432k
Granted FY2024
5
Grants
1
Communities
$140k
Largest
01What you fund
0179% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Youth Development$1.0MHousing & Shelter$1.0MHuman Services$466kArts & Culture$412kOther$778k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
affordableartonicinclusivecaringresponsiblecitizens
2020
prodigy at-riskat-risk youths
2021
prodigy at-riskat-risk youths
2022
prodigy at-riskat-risk youths
2023
prodigy at-riskat-risk youths
2024
prodigy at-riskat-risk youths
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 5 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $75k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $349k
$72,658
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
- ORLANDO NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT$140,044
- LACOOCHEE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$136,464
- YMCA OF ST PETERSBURG$72,658
- GIRLS INC OF LAKELAND$40,739
- POLK COUNTY PARKS & NATURAL RESOURCES$34,285
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $466k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.7M · 10 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else
10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
10
1
Total granted
$3.7M
$20k
Still filing today
70%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Housing & ShelterArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LBLACOOCHEE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB7× · 2018–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +42%
- ONORLANDO NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION7× · 2018–2024 · $835k · revenue +295%
- YOYMCA OF ST PETERSBURG7× · 2018–2024 · $466k · revenue +162%
Funded once
- CCCROSSOVER CHURCHone grant, 2018 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
The Tampa Bay History Center
Discovering, preserving, and learning from our region's past to inform our common future.
Environment
2
University of Florida Alumni
Education and research and shaping a better future for florida, the nation and the world," as determined by the university of florida board of trustees. the association strengthens the gator nation by involving and engaging its alumni,…
Education
3
The University of Tampa Incorporated
The University of Tampa is committed to the development of each student to become a productive and responsible citizen.
Education
4
Tampabay-Job-Links Inc
—
5
Tampa General Hospital
To support and promote the program services of florida health sciences center, inc. dba tampa general hospital.
Health
6
Florida Community Partners Inc
Provide assistance in the formation of capital to support affordable housing and other related community development initiatives in central florida.
—
7
University of Florida
To assist the university of florida in funding of research & development through grants & contractual arrangements & in the commercialization of intellectual properties, which include inventions, discoveries, processes, & work products.
Education
8
St Petersburg Opera Co Inc
The mission of the st. petersburg opera company is to enrich the cultural lives of the residents of, and visitors to, the tampa bay area by presenting fully staged professional opera productions of the highest quality, and to make opera…
Arts & Culture
9
Florida Classical Ballet Inc
Classical ballet
Arts & Culture
10
Florida Cultural Group Inc
The mission of the florida cultural group, inc. is to create, entertain and strengthen an artistic, creative, curious and thriving community by bringing people together.
Arts & Culture
11
Tampa Women Stars Inc
Community Improvement
12
Florida Association of the Aia
Aia florida is the voice of the architecture profession.
Arts & Culture
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Tampa Bay Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Arts Ensemble Education Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Youth Development$1,043,647Housing & Shelter$1,034,484Other$778,127Human Services$465,784Arts & Culture$411,967
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LACOOCHEE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds ORLANDO NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF ST PETERSBURG ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INC OF LAKELAND ↗
- Who funds THE FLORIDA ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds TAMPA HOUSING AUTHORITY ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF COMMUNITY STUDIES ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA MUSEUM OF PHOTOGRAPHIC ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE ARTS ENSEMBLE ED FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Community Foundation of Tampa Bay IncFL17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · United Way Suncoast Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation UNIVERSITY AREA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF COMMUNITY STUDIES.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~5 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 3 filed years.
Track record & reputation
high risk
3 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing; revenue up 2.0× since.
Legal standing
medium risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 593712006 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF COMMUNITY STUDIES, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
- FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 70% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to University Area Community Development?
Find your warmest path to University Area Community Development through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines