Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of West Georgia Inc

United way of west georgia's mission is to increase the organized capacity of people to care for one another by expanding them effectively to build a better, more self- sufficient community.

$515k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$135k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$2.1MEducation$988kYouth Development$621kPublic Safety & Disaster$417kCrime & Legal$314kFood & Nutrition$237kRecreation & Sports$89k
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 17 grants below total $493,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $514,746 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $21,246 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $198k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAGRANGE PERSONAL AID$135,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS$65,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$50,000
HARMONY HOUSE$30,000
INTERFAITH FOOD CLOSET$30,000
LAGRANGE ACTIVE LIFE$29,500
HOGANSVILLE SENIOR CENTER$27,500
CASA$25,000
MAIDEE SMITH NURSERY$20,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$20,000
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF TROUP$16,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF AMERICA$9,000
FOSTER GRANDPARENT PROGRAM$8,500
SENIOR COMPANIONS$8,500
LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA$8,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $677k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $56k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $55k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $55k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $55k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $48k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $48k → 14%HARMONY HOUSE: $35k → 18%HARMONY HOUSE: $35k → 18%HARMONY HOUSE: $35k → 18%HARMONY HOUSE: $35k → 18%HARMONY HOUSE: $30k → 18%HARMONY HOUSE: $30k → 18%HARMONY HOUSE: $30k → 18%HARMONY HOUSE: $30k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.7M · 20 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
2

Total granted

$4.7M
$12k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LP
    LAGRANGE PERSONAL AID ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +74% · 44% of their budget
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    8× · 2017–2024 · $417k · revenue +46%
  • MS
    MAIDEE SMITH EARLY CARE & LEARNING CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $349k · revenue +232% · 51% of their budget

Funded once

  • AN
    ATHLETES NAMED TROUP SPECIAL
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • WP
    WEST POINT ACTIVE LIFE
    one grant, 2024 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Girl Scouts of Southern Alabama

To provide volunteer support & training, and the girl scout leadership program within thirty counties in southern alabama.

2
First Tee of Troup County Georgia

To provide quality golf experience and life skill enhancements to youth of troup county, georgia.

Recreation & Sports
3
Boys and Girls of North Central Alabama Inc

Provide recreational activities, athletic programs, various educational and enrichment programs to members and other youth with an emphasis on the under privileged.

4
Boy Scouts of America Trust Fund 302 Choctaw Area Council

Financial support of choctaw area council no. 302, boy scouts of america, inc.

5
Troup Cares Inc

The purpose of troup cares, inc. is to study, evaluate, and implement systemic solutions for the lack of affordable health care for the persons in the troup county, georgia community.

Health
6
Tug Valley Recovery Shelter Associationinc

Shelter service for abused women and children in mingo and logan counties in west virginia.

7
Dougherty County Casa Inc

Dougherty County CASA, Inc. supports children who have experienced abuse or neglect by providing specially trained community volunteers to advocate for their best interests -- promoting their safety, stability, and permanent connections to…

Civil Rights
8
Hope House of North Georgia Inc

Emergency foster care for abused and neglected children in pickens, dawson, and surrounding counties.

Human Services
9
Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal
10
Boys & Girls Club of Valdosta Inc

Providing educational and recreational programs for children.

Youth Development
11
Chattahoochee Council Inc Boy Scouts of America

Our mission is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.

12
Court Appointed Special Advocates

To be the voice for children who have been victims of abuse and/or neglect. Our vision is to serve every child in the Cheaha Region by providing them with a caring and competent trained volunteer.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Troup Council On Aging Inc and the most unlike its peers is Chattahoochee Council Inc Boy Scouts of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LAGRANGE PERSONAL AID ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION INC — $1,252,750 · OtherLAGRANGE PERSONAL AID ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION INCCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS — $426,500 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLSThe Boys & Girls Club of West Georgia Inc — $335,704 · OtherThe Boys & Girls Club of West Georgia IncTROUP COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $277,700 · OtherTROUP COUNCIL ON AGING INCCHATTAHOOCHEE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $195,000 · OtherCHATTAHOOCHEE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAHOGANSVILLE SENIOR CENTER — $179,050 · OtherHOGANSVILLE SENIOR CENTERGEORGIA BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOMES AND FAMILY MINISTRIES INC — $144,000 · OtherTWIN CEDARS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $123,000 · Other+6 more — $248,250 · Other+6 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $416,661 · Human ServicesAmerican Nationa…HARMONY HOUSE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHE INC — $260,000 · Human ServicesHARMONY HOUSE DO…MAIDEE SMITH EARLY CARE & LEARNING CENTER INC — $348,500 · EducationMAIDEE SM…LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF TROUP CO INC — $69,000 · EducationLITERACY …CASA OF TROUP COUNTY INC — $191,000 · Crime & LegalINTERFAITH FOOD CLOSET — $99,750 · Food & NutritionGirl Scouts of Greater Atlanta Inc — $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP VIOLA INC — $77,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$3,181,954Human Services$676,661Education$417,500Crime & Legal$191,000Food & Nutrition$99,750Youth Development$90,000Recreation & Sports$77,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLAGRANGE PERSONAL AID ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION INC — $1,252,750 over 8y, 44% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $416,661 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMAIDEE SMITH EARLY CARE & LEARNING CENTER INC — $348,500 over 8y, 51% of budgetThe Boys & Girls Club of West Georgia Inc — $335,704 over 6y, 29% of budgetTROUP COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $277,700 over 8y, 75% of budgetHARMONY HOUSE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHE INC — $260,000 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetCHATTAHOOCHEE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $195,000 over 8y, 28% of budgetCASA OF TROUP COUNTY INC — $191,000 over 8y, 19% of budgetGirl Scouts of Greater Atlanta Inc — $90,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP VIOLA INC — $77,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF TROUP CO INC — $69,000 over 8y, 78% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAGRANGE PERSONAL AID ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds MAIDEE SMITH EARLY CARE & LEARNING CENTER INC
  • Who funds The Boys & Girls Club of West Georgia Inc
  • Who funds TROUP COUNCIL ON AGING INC
  • Who funds HARMONY HOUSE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHE INC
  • Who funds CHATTAHOOCHEE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds CASA OF TROUP COUNTY INC
  • Who funds INTERFAITH FOOD CLOSET
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of Greater Atlanta Inc
  • Who funds CAMP VIOLA INC
  • Who funds LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF TROUP CO INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Charter Foundation IncFL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Charter Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of West Georgia Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph