Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Van Wert County Inc

To increase the organized capacity of people to care for one another.

$239k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.8MHealth$376kYouth Development$85kEducation$68kScience & Tech$68kPublic Safety & Disaster$63kPhilanthropy$49kAnimals$41kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $175,547, the rows itemized in this filing. The $239,235 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $63,688 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $126k
$10,100
Median grant
1
States reached
$743k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YWCA$34,139
WEE CARE DAY CARE$18,008
HAVEN OF HOPE OF VAN WERT COUNTY$17,953
CRISIS CARE LINE$16,157
SALVATION ARMY$15,837
FAMILY HEALTH CARE OF NORTHWEST OH$13,548
COUNCIL ON AGING$10,100
COMMUNITY HEALTH PROFESSIONALS$9,718
CERT$8,842
FAMILY AND CHILDREN FIRST EMERGENCY$7,500
LINCOLNVIEW LATCHKEY$6,776
VAN WERT CITY SCHOOLS$6,138
VAN WERT COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$5,764
COUNCIL ON AGING$5,067
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $483k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%DELPHOS SENIOR CITIZENS: $8k → 13%DELPHOS SENIOR CITIZENS: $7k → 13%DELPHOS SENIOR CITIZENS: $6k → 13%DELPHOS SENIOR CITIZENS: $6k → 13%DELPHOS SENIOR CITIZENS: $5k → 13%DELPHOS SENIOR CITIZENS: $5k → 13%YWCA: $57k → 9%YWCA: $52k → 9%YWCA: $51k → 9%YWCA: $51k → 9%YWCA: $50k → 9%YWCA: $49k → 9%YWCA: $47k → 9%YWCA: $47k → 9%YWCA: $34k → 9%LOVE INC: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 22 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against -17% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
6

Total granted

$2.6M
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
-17%

Still filing today

73%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YW
    YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSN OF VAN WERT CO OHIO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $439k · revenue +71%
  • FH
    FAMILY HEALTH CARE OF NORTHWEST OHIO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $254k · revenue +104%
  • VW
    VAN WERT COUNTY DAY CARE CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $210k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • FU
    FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF VAN WERT
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • BY
    BUCKEYE Y
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Van Wert Area Economic Development Corporation
Community Improvement
2
Van Wert Housing Services Inc

To provide lifetime affordable, safe, and accessible housing for individuals with disabilities who reside in van wert county in the state of ohio.

Housing & Shelter
3
Van Wert County Hospital Association

Our mission is to improve the health of those we serve.

Health
4
Vermilion County Child Advocacy Center

Perform forensic interviews on minor children in response to calls from either the Department of Children and Family Services or law enforcement, regarding potential abuse of the child. The Center works as an advocate for the child with…

Crime & Legal
5
Family Crisis Centers Inc

Walk with people facing violence, offering safety, support, and hope as they heal and rebuild. with every step forward, we build stronger, more resilient communities.

Human Services
6
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
7
Crime Victim Advocacy Center of St Louis

Crime victim advocacy center's mission is to pursue a definition of justice which includes the victim. the center serves victims of all types of crime by providing a wide range of services such as counseling, advocacy, and offering…

—
8
United Way of Van Wert County Inc

To increase the organized capacity of people to care for one another. the united way of van wert county, inc. tries to improve the quality of life throughout van wert county by allocating resources accordingly.

Philanthropy
9
Wabash Valley Recovery Center
Health
10
Vcs Inc

To provide counseling services to county residents and to provide services to the court system of the county.

Health
11
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
12
First Step the Western Wayne County Project Domestic Assault

Incorporated for the purpose of acting as a human service agency for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater Cleveland; the most unlike its peers is Mav Youth Mentoring Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $476,575 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCRISIS CARE LINE: $241,529 · OtherCRISIS CARE LINEVAN WERT COUNTY DAY CARE CENTER INC: $209,599 · OtherVAN WERT COUNTY DAY CARE CENTER INCVAN WERT COUNTY PORT AUTHORITY: $158,202 · OtherVAN WERT COUNTY PORT AUTHORITYYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $133,696 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONLINCOLNVIEW LOCAL SCHOOLS: $67,184 · OtherWestwood Behavioral Health Center Inc: $58,967 · OtherVAN WERT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $56,525 · OtherMAV YOUTH MENTORING INC: $52,720 · Other+8 more: $121,814 · Other+8 moreYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSN OF VAN WERT CO OHIO: $438,740 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRIST…Delphos Senior Citizens Inc: $38,604 · Human ServicesDelphos Senior Citiz…+1 more: $6,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY HEALTH CARE OF NORTHWEST OHIO: $254,403 · HealthFAMILY HEALTH…COMMUNITY HEALTH PROFESSIONALS INC: $57,670 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEA…+1 more: $5,125 · HealthHAVEN OF HOPE OF VAN WERT COUNTY INC: $121,903 · Housing & ShelterUNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $36,550 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF PAULDING COUNTY: $12,224 · PhilanthropyVAN WERT COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $40,616 · AnimalsWest Ohio Food Bank: $27,714 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,576,811Human Services$483,344Health$317,198Housing & Shelter$121,903Philanthropy$48,774Animals$40,616Food & Nutrition$27,714

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSN OF VAN WERT CO OHIO: $438,740 over 9y, 8.7% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH CARE OF NORTHWEST OHIO: $254,403 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetCRISIS CARE LINE: $241,529 over 9y, 28% of budgetVAN WERT COUNTY DAY CARE CENTER INC: $209,599 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $133,696 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetHAVEN OF HOPE OF VAN WERT COUNTY INC: $121,903 over 5y, 24% of budgetWestwood Behavioral Health Center Inc: $58,967 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROFESSIONALS INC: $57,670 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetVAN WERT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $56,525 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetMAV YOUTH MENTORING INC: $52,720 over 7y, 6.5% of budgetVAN WERT COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $40,616 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetDelphos Senior Citizens Inc: $38,604 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $36,550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWest Ohio Food Bank: $27,714 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA: $12,374 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF PAULDING COUNTY: $12,224 over 2y, 11% of budgetLOVE INC OF VAN WERT COUNTY: $6,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetVAN WERT COUNTY VICTIMS SERVICES INC: $5,609 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetFOA FOUNDATION: $5,125 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSN OF VAN WERT CO OHIO ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY HEALTH CARE OF NORTHWEST OHIO ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS CARE LINE ↗
  • Who funds VAN WERT COUNTY DAY CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN OF HOPE OF VAN WERT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Westwood Behavioral Health Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH PROFESSIONALS INC ↗
  • Who funds VAN WERT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds MAV YOUTH MENTORING INC ↗
  • Who funds VAN WERT COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Delphos Senior Citizens Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds West Ohio Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF PAULDING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds LOVE INC OF VAN WERT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds VAN WERT COUNTY VICTIMS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FOA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Van Wert County FoundationOH30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Van Wert County Foundation · Columbus Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Van Wert County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Van Wert County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Van Wert County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph