Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Union County Inc

The united way of union county is a voluntary effort to increase the organized capacity of people who care for one another.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$357k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Youth Development$3.4MHuman Services$2.6MHealth$2.4MCommunity Improvement$291kEducation$186kAnimals$183kCrime & Legal$127k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $773k
  • $250k+2 grants · $607k
$76,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EL DORADO$356,500
HOPE LANDING$250,000
SALVATION ARMY$240,000
COMMUNITY LIVING ARRANGEMENTS$80,000
BOY SCOUTS-DESOTO COUNCIL$78,000
HORIZONS$76,000
MAGDALENE HOUSE$72,200
SOUTH ARKANSAS DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER$67,000
SOUTH ARKANSAS CHILDRENS COALITION$53,400
TURNING POINT$53,000
UNION COUNTY ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY$53,000
LITERACY COUNCIL$19,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%HOPE LANDING: $250k → 19%HOPE LANDING: $225k → 19%HOPE LANDING: $212k → 19%HOPE LANDING: $207k → 19%HOPE LANDING: $198k → 19%HOPE LANDING: $183k → 19%HOPE LANDING: $180k → 19%HOPE LANDING: $180k → 19%COMMUNITY LIVING ARRANGEMENTS: $82k → 19%COMMUNITY LIVING ARRANGEMENTS: $80k → 19%COMMUNITY LIVING ARRANGEMENTS: $80k → 19%COMMUNITY LIVING ARRANGEMENTS: $80k → 19%COMMUNITY LIVING ARRANGEMENTS: $75k → 19%COMMUNITY LIVING ARRANGEMENTS: $73k → 19%COMMUNITY LIVING ARRANGEMENTS: $73k → 19%COMMUNITY LIVING ARRANGEMENTS: $71k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.2M · 14 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
0

Total granted

$9.2M
$0

Still filing today

79%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthEducationCivil RightsAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EL DORADO INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +62% · 31% of their budget
  • HL
    HOPE LANDING INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +18%
  • DS
    DE SOTO AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $712k · revenue +7% · 31% of their budget

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Casa of North Arkansas

    The organization and its volunteers serve as advocates for abused and neglected children.

    Civil Rights
    2
    Searcy Childrens Home Inc Sparrows Promise

    Providing hope for children and families in the arkansas child welfare system provide foster care, supervised visitation services, a safe space for children to rest while waiting on a foster family and training for foster families.

    3
    Arkansas Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc

    The organization provides a therapeutic shelter and care for homeless and/or abused children.

    Housing & Shelter
    4
    The Arkansas Center for Independence

    Habilitation and residential services for adults with developmental disabilities

    Human Services
    5
    Arkansas Coalition Against Domestic Violence

    Provide help to domestic violence victims and encourage community efforts to promote domestic peace.

    6
    Southern Arkansas University Foundation Inc

    Provide financial aid & scholarships

    Education
    7
    Southwest Arkansas Counseling & Mental Health Center Inc

    Southwest Arkansas Counseling and Mental Health Center, Inc. is a not-for-profit organization that provides counseling and mental health services to residents of Southwest Arkansas.

    Health
    8
    Southeast Arkansas Behavioral Healthcare

    To create an environment where staff is conscientious to the behavioral health needs of the area in a manner which is client oriented, accessible, affordable, and quality driven.

    Health
    9
    Central Arkansas Development Council

    To provide services to low income individuals.

    Community Improvement
    10
    Legal Aid of Arkansas

    To provide legal assistance & housing counseling to the underprivileged citizens of north arkansas.

    Crime & Legal
    11
    Rise House Arkansas

    To provide assistance to victims of domestic abuse and to educate the community to work toward the prevention of family violence.

    Human Services
    12
    Arkansas Enterprises for the Developmentally Disabled Inc

    Teaching work skills and daily living skills to individuals with developmental disabilities.

    Human Services

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Arkansas Children's Coalition and the most unlike its peers is Magdalene House El Dorado. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    5
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    7
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    11/12
    Grantees still filing
    10/12
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EL DORADO INC — $2,317,292 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EL DORADO INCSALVATION ARMY — $1,667,922 · OtherSALVATION ARMYDE SOTO AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC — $711,577 · OtherDE SOTO AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INCSOUTH ARKANSAS DEVELOPMENT CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $521,137 · OtherSOUTH ARKANSAS DEVELOPMENT CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INCTURNING POINT OF SOUTH ARKANSAS INC — $290,852 · Other+1 more — $124,759 · OtherHOPE LANDING INC — $1,635,017 · Human ServicesHOPE LANDING INCCommunity Living Arrangements Inc — $613,794 · Human ServicesCommunity Living Arrangemen…CAMP FIRE EL DORADO INC — $418,196 · Youth DevelopmentSOUTH ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S COALITION — $286,487 · Civil RightsSOUTH ARKANSAS FIGHTS AIDS — $230,484 · HealthUNION COUNTY ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY INC — $182,567 · AnimalsMAGDALENE HOUSE EL DORADO — $127,200 · Crime & LegalSOUTH ARKANSAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $60,909 · Education
    Other$5,633,539Human Services$2,248,811Youth Development$418,196Civil Rights$286,487Health$230,484Animals$182,567Crime & Legal$127,200Education$60,909

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EL DORADO INC — $2,317,292 over 8y, 31% of budgetHOPE LANDING INC — $1,635,017 over 8y, 14% of budgetDE SOTO AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC — $711,577 over 8y, 31% of budgetCommunity Living Arrangements Inc — $613,794 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetSOUTH ARKANSAS DEVELOPMENT CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $521,137 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetCAMP FIRE EL DORADO INC — $418,196 over 8y, 31% of budgetTURNING POINT OF SOUTH ARKANSAS INC — $290,852 over 8y, 13% of budgetSOUTH ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S COALITION — $286,487 over 8y, 12% of budgetSOUTH ARKANSAS FIGHTS AIDS — $230,484 over 7y, 68% of budgetUNION COUNTY ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY INC — $182,567 over 5y, 12% of budgetMAGDALENE HOUSE EL DORADO — $127,200 over 2y, 57% of budgetSOUTH ARKANSAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $60,909 over 6y, 4.8% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EL DORADO INC
    • Who funds HOPE LANDING INC
    • Who funds DE SOTO AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC
    • Who funds Community Living Arrangements Inc
    • Who funds SOUTH ARKANSAS DEVELOPMENT CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC
    • Who funds CAMP FIRE EL DORADO INC
    • Who funds TURNING POINT OF SOUTH ARKANSAS INC
    • Who funds SOUTH ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S COALITION
    • Who funds SOUTH ARKANSAS FIGHTS AIDS
    • Who funds UNION COUNTY ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY INC
    • Who funds MAGDALENE HOUSE EL DORADO
    • Who funds SOUTH ARKANSAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization United Way of Union County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph