Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Toombs & Montgomery

To provide community support.

$419k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$1.5MYouth Development$422kPhilanthropy$407kHealth$378kArts & Culture$259kPublic Benefit$200kPublic Safety & Disaster$135kHousing & Shelter$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 15 grants below total $407,352 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $419,288 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $11,936 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $351k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$878k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONCERTED SERVICES$50,750
THE REFUGE$47,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$44,000
SE CLC PROG$35,000
SE GA COMM PROJECT$35,000
MONT CO SR CITIZENS$28,000
RED CROSS$26,877
SALVATION ARMY$25,000
TLC CASA$20,600
SUNSHINE HOUSE$20,500
PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME$20,000
RACHEL'S HOUSE$20,000
TOOMBS CO ARC$15,000
WHEELER CO SR CITIZENS$14,000
THE FORGE$5,625
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $161k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME: $21k → 21%PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME: $20k → 21%PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME: $20k → 21%PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME: $20k → 21%PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME: $20k → 21%PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME: $20k → 21%PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME: $20k → 21%PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME: $20k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.4M · 12 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$3.4M
$33k

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentHealthCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF TOOMBS & MONTGOMERY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +6% · 35% of their budget
  • TC
    TLC CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $542k · revenue +6%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TOOMBS COUNTY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $368k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • OP
    OVERAGES PAID TO ABOVE
    one grant, 2021 · $33k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope House of North Georgia Inc

Emergency foster care for abused and neglected children in pickens, dawson, and surrounding counties.

Human Services
2
Hannahs Home

Hannahs Home is a Christ-centered life-affirming maternity home for women who are in crisis.

Human Services
3
Greater Chattanooga Christian Services Inc

Provide Group and Foster care for Homeless Children and Counseling

Human Services
4
Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal
5
Talladega County Child Advocacy Center Inc

Interview facility for child abuse victims.

Human Services
6
Redemption House Ministries

Transitional shelter for women, men and children for central oregon. to provide shelter and a safe place for hope.

Human Services
7
Tug Valley Recovery Shelter Associationinc

Shelter service for abused women and children in mingo and logan counties in west virginia.

8
Treehouse of Tallahassee Inc

Provide housing for abused children.

Human Services
9
HouseofHopeRefugeofLoveInc

Restoring our youth by turning trauma into triumph for female suvivors of child sex trafficking in Georgia.

Human Services
10
The Lullaby House

The Lullaby House missionis ot strengthen families by providing programs and services to teenage parents and familites in need which will inspire and promote generational change.

Youth Development
11
Lighthouse Ministries Inc

Provide a home and care for unwed pregnant girls

Religion
12
Selah Life Choices Inc

We exist to serve women who have been trafficked. through our confidential services, we offer a safe space for healing to begin while we compassionately reflect jesus to all we encounter.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tlc Children's Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Emanuel Co Child Abuse Prevention Ctr. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF TOOMBS & MONTGOMERY — $1,307,899 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF TOOMBS & MONTGOMERYTLC CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $542,361 · Civil RightsTLC CHILDREN'S SER…SE CLC PROG — $253,116 · OtherSE CLC PROGRACHEL'S HOUSE — $159,062 · OtherRACHEL'S HOUSEOVERAGE PAID TO ABOVE — $53,480 · OtherOVERAGE PAID TO A…OVERAGES PAID TO ABOVE — $32,952 · OtherOVERAGES PAID TO …+2 more — $15,873 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TOOMBS COUNTY — $368,250 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS…PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME INC — $160,500 · Human ServicesPAUL ANDER…THE REFUGE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC — $91,000 · Human ServicesTHE REFUGE…GOD'S STOREHOUSE OF VIDALIA INC — $65,750 · Human ServicesGOD'S STOR…MERCY MEDICAL CLINIC AND FOUNDATION INC — $219,020 · HealthEMANUEL CO CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CTR — $134,281 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$1,307,899Civil Rights$542,361Other$514,483Youth Development$368,250Human Services$317,250Health$219,020Crime & Legal$134,281

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF TOOMBS & MONTGOMERY — $1,307,899 over 8y, 35% of budgetTLC CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $542,361 over 8y, 11% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TOOMBS COUNTY — $368,250 over 8y, 11% of budgetMERCY MEDICAL CLINIC AND FOUNDATION INC — $219,020 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetPAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME INC — $160,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetRACHEL'S HOUSE — $159,062 over 8y, 11% of budgetEMANUEL CO CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CTR — $134,281 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetTHE REFUGE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC — $91,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetGOD'S STOREHOUSE OF VIDALIA INC — $65,750 over 6y, 14% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF TOOMBS & MONTGOMERY
  • Who funds TLC CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TOOMBS COUNTY
  • Who funds MERCY MEDICAL CLINIC AND FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME INC
  • Who funds RACHEL'S HOUSE
  • Who funds EMANUEL CO CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CTR
  • Who funds THE REFUGE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC
  • Who funds GOD'S STOREHOUSE OF VIDALIA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA7.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Toombs & Montgomery funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph