Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Toombs & Montgomery

To provide community support.

$419k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.5MYouth Development$422kPhilanthropy$407kHealth$378kArts & Culture$259kPublic Benefit$200kPublic Safety & Disaster$135kHousing & Shelter$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $407,352, the rows itemized in this filing. The $419,288 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,936 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $351k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$878k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONCERTED SERVICES$50,750
THE REFUGE$47,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$44,000
SE CLC PROG$35,000
SE GA COMM PROJECT$35,000
MONT CO SR CITIZENS$28,000
RED CROSS$26,877
SALVATION ARMY$25,000
TLC CASA$20,600
SUNSHINE HOUSE$20,500
PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME$20,000
RACHEL'S HOUSE$20,000
TOOMBS CO ARC$15,000
WHEELER CO SR CITIZENS$14,000
THE FORGE$5,625
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $161k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME: $21k → 21%PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME: $20k → 21%PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME: $20k → 21%PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME: $20k → 21%PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME: $20k → 21%PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME: $20k → 21%PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME: $20k → 21%PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME: $20k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 12 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$3.4M
$33k

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF TOOMBS & MONTGOMERY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +6% · 35% of their budget
  • TC
    TLC CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $542k · revenue +6%
  • MM
    MERCY MEDICAL CLINIC AND FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $219k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • OP
    OVERAGES PAID TO ABOVE
    one grant, 2021 · $33k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope House of North Georgia Inc

Emergency foster care for abused and neglected children in pickens, dawson, and surrounding counties.

Human Services
2
Hannahs Home

Hannahs Home is a Christ-centered life-affirming maternity home for women who are in crisis.

Human Services
3
Greater Chattanooga Christian Services Inc

Provide Group and Foster care for Homeless Children and Counseling

Human Services
4
Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal
5
Treehouse of Tallahassee Inc

Provide housing for abused children.

Human Services
6
Talladega County Child Advocacy Center Inc

Interview facility for child abuse victims.

Human Services
7
Tug Valley Recovery Shelter Associationinc

Shelter service for abused women and children in mingo and logan counties in west virginia.

—
8
Safehouse Ministries

To provide services to abused and neglected youth assigned by county children service boards or juvenille court system.

Human Services
9
Genesis House Inc

To promote the general welfare of victims of domestic and sexual violence by providing shelter, goods and services while helping them find safety in their lives and the self-sufficiency and healing needed to become independent and to…

—
10
Raleigh's Place

Raleigh's place is a christ-centered foster care ministry that exisits to live the gospel by loving the fatherless. we serve chilton and surrounding counties as we provide and support foster homes, host a free summer camp, provide clothing…

Human Services
11
A New Beginning for Women and Children

We are a ministry that serves women and children who are homeless, who need accountability for sober living or who are recovering from domestic violencwe

Human Services
12
Robertson County Child Advocacy Cen

Effective prosecution of child abuses, providing therapy and education for the abused, and providing a safe haven for the abused.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tlc Children's Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Emanuel Co Child Abuse Prevention Ctr. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF TOOMBS & MONTGOMERY: $1,307,899 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF TOOMBS & MONTGOMERYTLC CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $542,361 · Civil RightsTLC CHILDREN'S SER…SE CLC PROG: $253,116 · OtherSE CLC PROGRACHEL'S HOUSE: $159,062 · OtherRACHEL'S HOUSEOVERAGE PAID TO ABOVE: $53,480 · OtherOVERAGE PAID TO A…OVERAGES PAID TO ABOVE: $32,952 · OtherOVERAGES PAID TO …+2 more: $15,873 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TOOMBS COUNTY: $368,250 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS…PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME INC: $160,500 · Human ServicesPAUL ANDER…THE REFUGE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC: $91,000 · Human ServicesTHE REFUGE…GOD'S STOREHOUSE OF VIDALIA INC: $65,750 · Human ServicesGOD'S STOR…MERCY MEDICAL CLINIC AND FOUNDATION INC: $219,020 · HealthEMANUEL CO CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CTR: $134,281 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$1,307,899Civil Rights$542,361Other$514,483Youth Development$368,250Human Services$317,250Health$219,020Crime & Legal$134,281

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF TOOMBS & MONTGOMERY: $1,307,899 over 8y, 35% of budgetTLC CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $542,361 over 8y, 11% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TOOMBS COUNTY: $368,250 over 8y, 11% of budgetMERCY MEDICAL CLINIC AND FOUNDATION INC: $219,020 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetPAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME INC: $160,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetRACHEL'S HOUSE: $159,062 over 8y, 11% of budgetEMANUEL CO CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CTR: $134,281 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetTHE REFUGE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC: $91,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetGOD'S STOREHOUSE OF VIDALIA INC: $65,750 over 6y, 14% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF TOOMBS & MONTGOMERY ↗
  • Who funds TLC CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TOOMBS COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MERCY MEDICAL CLINIC AND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds RACHEL'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds EMANUEL CO CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CTR ↗
  • Who funds THE REFUGE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S STOREHOUSE OF VIDALIA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA7.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Toombs & Montgomery funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Toombs & Montgomery. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Toombs & Montgomery’s filings →

    More from the funding graph