Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of the Coalfield Inc

To unite volunteer efforts to plan and monitor effective human service programs that are responsive to community needs and promote the quality of life in hopkins and muhlenberg counties in kentucky.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$306kArts & Culture$118kCommunity Improvement$96kHealth$35kYouth Development$35kEducation$25kCrime & Legal$24kEmployment$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $10,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $90,110 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $80,110 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$120k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPKINS COUNTY LONG TERM RECOVERY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%HOPKINS COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $18k → 19%HOPKINS COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $18k → 19%HOPKINS COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $17k → 19%HOPKINS COUNTY YMCA: $15k → 19%HOPKINS COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $9k → 19%HOPKINS COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $7k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$607k · 13 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$607k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+143%

Still filing today

46%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesHealthEducationEmploymentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PENNYRILE ALLIED COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $96k · revenue +79%
  • HC
    Hopkins County Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $84k · revenue +112%
  • SI
    SANCTUARY INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $56k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • O
    OTHERS
    one grant, 2017 · $23k
  • CO
    CASA OF MIDWEST KENTUCKY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $14k · revenue +143%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pennyrile Children's Advocacy Center Inc

To provide support and services to victims of child abuse and their non - offending caregivers

Human Services
2
Thomasville Community Center Inc

To provide child care

Recreation & Sports
3
Harrison County Food Pantry Inc

The food pantry is open one day per week to serve the hungry in cynthiana and harrison county kentucky. food is purchased from contributions and distributed to those in need. in 2025, the pantry served 96 individuals and 42 families per…

Religion
4
Huntington County Child Advocacy Center Inc Dba Mckenzie's Hope

Provide a safe and compassionate, child focused center to promptly and thoroughly investigate child abuse.

Human Services
5
Caring Place of Cincinnati

Provide food and clothing to low-income families of the Cincinnati communities of Golf Manor, Kennedy Heights, Silverton and Pleasant Ridge. We also provide senior citizen in our community with access to a social worker to assist them in…

—
6
Maysville Hands of Hope Inc

Assist the needy/homeless individuals in the area

Human Services
7
Hope House Inc

Counseling services to individuals for substance abuse, domestic violence, general classes, anger management, day sessions, parenting classes, ged and other educational classes. supply clothing and food to needy.

Health
8
Hope Center of Hendersonville

It is our mission to nuture an environment where individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities are valued, provided opportunities, and treated with god's love and compassion.

Religion
9
United Neighborhood Centers of Northeastern Pennsylvania

Social services

Human Services
10
Henry County Casa Inc

Aid children in conjunction with human services and the juvenile court system

Human Services
11
Mccreary Christian Center Inc

McCreary Christian Center Christian Outreach and Food Pantry Saint Joseph Inn Over see Inn that is used to house Volunteers from out of town

Human Services
12
Transition 2 Hope Inc

To provide people with solutions to achieve housing stability

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Muhlenberg County Opportunity Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is HOPE2ALL Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $99,861 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYSANCTUARY INC: $55,998 · OtherSANCTUARY INCPACS: $53,051 · OtherPACSSALVATION ARMY: $44,859 · OtherSALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient: $44,047 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIMPACT MENTORING INC: $23,856 · OtherIMPACT MENTORING INCOTHERS: $22,544 · OtherOTHERSPENNYROYAL CENTER TRACE: $15,000 · Other+7 more: $53,972 · Other+7 morePENNYRILE ALLIED COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $96,143 · Community ImprovementPENNYRILE ALLIE…Hopkins County Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc: $83,972 · Human ServicesHopkins Count…HOPE2ALL INC: $36,146 · HealthThe Learning Center of Madisonville Inc: $24,831 · EducationMUHLENBERG COUNTY OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC: $15,268 · EmploymentCASA OF MIDWEST KENTUCKY INC: $13,767 · Civil Rights
Other$413,188Community Improvement$96,143Human Services$83,972Health$36,146Education$24,831Employment$15,268Civil Rights$13,767

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPENNYRILE ALLIED COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $96,143 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHopkins County Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc: $83,972 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetSANCTUARY INC: $55,998 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetHOPE2ALL INC: $36,146 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetThe Learning Center of Madisonville Inc: $24,831 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetIMPACT MENTORING INC: $23,856 over 3y, 16% of budgetMUHLENBERG COUNTY OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC: $15,268 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PENNYRILE ALLIED COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Hopkins County Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE2ALL INC ↗
  • Who funds The Learning Center of Madisonville Inc ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT MENTORING INC ↗
  • Who funds MUHLENBERG COUNTY OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF MIDWEST KENTUCKY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Felix E Martin Jr Foundation IncKY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Felix E Martin Jr Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of the Coalfield Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of the Coalfield Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of the Coalfield’s filings →

    More from the funding graph