Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Southwest Oklahoma

UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST OKLAHOMA mobilizes the communities we serve in ways no single agency, individual, or government can to enhance the ability of people to care.

$661k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$128k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$3.2MHealth$753kCrime & Legal$753kHousing & Shelter$650kYouth Development$626kFood & Nutrition$549kScience & Tech$62kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $162k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $486k
$43,731
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARIE DETTY YOUTH & FAM SVCS$128,250
SALVATION ARMY CORP$100,271
CENTER FOR CREATIVE LIVING$78,358
LAWTON FOOD BANK$62,638
MIGHT TECHNOLOGY & LEARNING CENTER$62,379
TEEN COURT INC$53,672
HEARTS THAT CARE$43,731
CASA OF SW OKLAHOMA$34,886
CHRISTIAN FAMILY COUNSELING CE$34,094
FAMILY PROMISE LAWTON$23,463
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$13,145
BOY SCOUTS LAST FRONTIER COUN$12,393
Individual grant recipient$7,185
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHRISTIAN FAMILY COUNSELING CE: $34k → 16%CHRISTIAN FAMILY COUNSELING CE: $32k → 16%CHRISTIAN FAMILY COUNSELING CE: $28k → 16%CHRISTIAN FAMILY COUNSELING CE: $27k → 16%CHRISTIAN FAMILY COUNSELING CE: $26k → 16%CHRISTIAN FAMILY COUNSELING CE: $24k → 16%CHRISTIAN FAMILY COUNSEL: $17k → 16%Christian Family Counseling: $11k → 16%CHRISTIAN FAMILY COUNSELING CE: $10k → 16%MARIE DETTY YOUTH & FAM SVC: $161k → 16%MARIE DETTY YOUTH & FAM SVC: $154k → 16%MARIE DETTY YOUTH & FAM SVC: $136k → 16%MARIE DETTY YOUTH & FAM SVC: $135k → 16%MARIE DETTY YOUTH & FAM SVC: $106k → 16%MARIE DETTY YOUTH & FAM SVC: $100k → 16%FAMILY PROMISE LAWTON: $23k → 16%Family Promise of Lawton: $17k → 16%FAMILY PROMISE OF LAWTON: $13k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.9M · 18 repeat orgs$732k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +92% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
13

Total granted

$5.9M
$534k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+92%
-4%

Still filing today

39%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $198k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MD
    MARIE DETTY YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICE CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $937k · revenue +92%
  • CF
    Center for Creative Living
    9× · 2017–2025 · $768k · revenue +89% · 27% of their budget
  • LF
    LAWTON FOOD BANK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $549k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • MD
    Marie Detty Youth and Family
    one grant, 2018 · $146k
  • GP
    GREAT PLAINS IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $71k · revenue -67%
  • HT
    HEARTS THAT CARE VOLUNTEER HEALTH CLINIC INC
    one grant, 2017 · $71k · revenue -58%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Advocacy Center of Central Ok Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…

Human Services
2
Trinity Legal Clinic of Oklahoma

Trinity legal clinic of oklahoma inc is an oklahoma not-for-profit corporation whose mission is to answer god's call to seek justice for the poor. in an effort to address the overwhelming need for legal assistance to the poor, trinity…

Crime & Legal
3
Tulsa Casa Inc

Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
4
Oklahoma Alternative Resources

Provide assistance to those in bona fide need of legal help relating to domestic violence.

Crime & Legal
5
22nd Judicial District Casa Inc

Court Appointed Special Advocate

Education
6
Casa of Southern Oklahoma Inc

Solicit, train & direct activities of court-appointed volunteer advocates for children in cases involving child abuse and neglect. assist in direct expense needs of individual children in court-appointed cases.

Civil Rights
7
Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers

Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers, Inc. serves the community behavioral health needs of nine counties of Southern Oklahoma. Lighthouse offers integrated care through their outpatient and Health Home programs to adults and children.…

Health
8
Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc Dba the Care Center

The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.

Human Services
9
La Luz Organization Inc

La Luz Organization helps the underserved Latino population in Oklahoma with culturally and faith based trauma-informed services to victims of domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking.

Human Services
10
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
11
Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc

Assist in preparing homeless and near homeless women in the skills to care for their children and enable them to move toward self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
12
Child Welfare Citizen Board of Can Co Oklahoma Inc

to provide a safe, child-friendly environment for abused children

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Lawton Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Roadback Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY: $926,130 · OtherSALVATION ARMYCenter for Creative Living: $768,286 · OtherCenter for Creative LivingLAWTON FOOD BANK INC: $548,679 · OtherLAWTON FOOD BANK INCC CARTER CRANE SHELTER: $524,905 · OtherC CARTER CRANE SHELTERRoadback Inc: $420,253 · OtherRoadback IncHEARTS THAT CARE: $222,819 · OtherCASA OF SW OKLAHOMA: $212,064 · OtherBOY SCOUTS LAST FRONTIER COUN: $196,507 · Other+16 more: $1,015,343 · Other+16 moreMARIE DETTY YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICE CENTER INC: $937,449 · Human ServicesMARIE DETTY YOUTH & …Christian Family Counseling Center: $209,284 · Human ServicesChristian Family Cou…FAMILY PROMISE OF LAWTON INCORPORATED: $54,082 · Human ServicesTeen Court Inc: $429,221 · Crime & LegalCASA of Southwest Oklahoma Inc: $16,935 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $15,216 · Crime & LegalHEARTS THAT CARE VOLUNTEER HEALTH CLINIC INC: $70,537 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $8,922 · HealthBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 480 LAST FRONTIER COUNCIL: $44,531 · Youth DevelopmentGirl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc: $5,516 · Youth Development
Other$4,834,986Human Services$1,200,815Crime & Legal$461,372Health$79,459Youth Development$50,047

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARIE DETTY YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICE CENTER INC: $937,449 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetCenter for Creative Living: $768,286 over 9y, 27% of budgetLAWTON FOOD BANK INC: $548,679 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetTeen Court Inc: $429,221 over 9y, 24% of budgetRoadback Inc: $420,253 over 7y, 6.3% of budgetChristian Family Counseling Center: $209,284 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $108,952 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetGREAT PLAINS IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION: $71,463 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetHEARTS THAT CARE VOLUNTEER HEALTH CLINIC INC: $70,537 over 1y, 10% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF LAWTON INCORPORATED: $54,082 over 3y, 14% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 480 LAST FRONTIER COUNCIL: $44,531 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCASA of Southwest Oklahoma Inc: $16,935 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $15,216 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $8,922 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGirl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc: $5,516 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARIE DETTY YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Center for Creative Living ↗
  • Who funds LAWTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Teen Court Inc ↗
  • Who funds Roadback Inc ↗
  • Who funds Christian Family Counseling Center ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT PLAINS IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEARTS THAT CARE VOLUNTEER HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF LAWTON INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 480 LAST FRONTIER COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds CASA of Southwest Oklahoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Priddy FoundationTX22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Priddy Foundation · Lawton Community Foundation Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Veterans United Foundation · Arvest Foundation · McMahon Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Southwest Oklahoma funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Southwest Oklahoma. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on United Way of Southwest Oklahoma’s filings →

More from the funding graph