Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Southern Illinois Inc

The united way of southern illinois, inc.

$129k
Granted FY2018
4
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 84% of UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2018 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $62,783 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $129,196 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $66,413 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $56k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$65k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DESIGNATIONS$27,107
MARION MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE$15,000
Individual grant recipient$13,644
THE WOMEN'S CENTER$7,032
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 15%WILLIAMSON COUNTY PROGRAMS ON AGING: $7k → 13%SENIOR ADULT SERVICES: $7k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$86k · 3 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
9

Total granted

$86k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+23%

Still filing today

67%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Human ServicesCivil RightsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MARION MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $38k · revenue +19%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2018 · $33k
  • SE
    SURVIVOR EMPOWERMENT CENTER INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $15k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS - SOUTHERN ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • WC
    WILLIAMSON COUNTY PROGRAMS ON AGING
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +14%
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS - GREATER ST LOUIS COUN
    one grant, 2017 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MARION MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE — $38,250 · OtherMARION MINISTERIAL ALLIANCEIndividual grant recipient — $32,756 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDESIGNATIONS — $27,107 · OtherDESIGNATIONSSURVIVOR EMPOWERMENT CENTER INC — $14,522 · OtherSURVIVOR EMPOWERMENT CENTER INCGIRL SCOUTS - SOUTHERN ILLINOIS — $7,611 · OtherBOY SCOUTS - GREATER ST LOUIS COUN — $7,019 · OtherWILLIAMSON COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS CEN — $6,288 · OtherSI COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS — $5,776 · OtherTHE WOMEN'S CENTER-RAPE CRISIS — $5,683 · OtherWILLIAMSON COUNTY PROGRAMS ON AGING — $7,498 · Human ServicesWILLIAMSO…SENIOR ADULT SERVICES — $6,740 · Human ServicesSENIOR AD…CASA OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS INC — $7,005 · Civil RightsGUMDROPS NFP — $5,940 · Food & Nutrition
Other$145,012Human Services$14,238Civil Rights$7,005Food & Nutrition$5,940

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMARION MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE — $38,250 over 2y, 20% of budgetSURVIVOR EMPOWERMENT CENTER INC — $14,522 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWILLIAMSON COUNTY PROGRAMS ON AGING — $7,498 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCASA OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS INC — $7,005 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetGUMDROPS NFP — $5,940 over 1y, 4.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARION MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE
  • Who funds SURVIVOR EMPOWERMENT CENTER INC
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON COUNTY PROGRAMS ON AGING
  • Who funds CASA OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS INC
  • Who funds SENIOR ADULT SERVICES
  • Who funds GUMDROPS NFP

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Southern Illinois Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $15k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2018, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph