Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Southeast Georgia

To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of communities.

$249k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$533kCrime & Legal$381kYouth Development$311kFood & Nutrition$178kPublic Safety & Disaster$133kHealth$132kEducation$75kPhilanthropy$43kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $196,900, the rows itemized in this filing. The $249,364 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $52,464 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $175k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$808k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BULLOCH COUNTY$35,500
ACTIONPACT$29,400
FOOD BANK INC$27,500
CITIZENS AGAINST VIOLENCE$25,000
CASA$20,000
SALVATION ARMY$15,000
RED CROSS$12,500
FOSTERING BULLOCH$10,000
THE LIGHTHOUSE PROJECT$8,000
BULLOCH MED CONNECTION$8,000
HEARTS & HANDS CLINIC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $311k) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 20%CITIZENS AGAINST VIOLENCE: $40k → 24%CITIZENS AGAINST VIOLENCE: $40k → 24%CITIZENS AGAINST VIOLENCE: $35k → 24%CITIZENS AGAINST VIOLENCE: $35k → 24%CITIZENS AGAINST VIOLENCE: $35k → 24%CITIZENS AGAINST VIOLENCE: $32k → 24%CITIZENS AGAINST VIOLENCE: $31k → 24%CITIZENS AGAINST VIOLENCE: $31k → 24%CITIZENS AGAINST VIOLENCE: $25k → 24%FOSTERING BULLOCH: $10k → 24%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 16 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$1.8M
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+22%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentReligionCrime & LegalScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BULLOCH COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $301k · revenue +54%
  • CA
    CITIZENS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $301k · revenue +10%
  • AP
    ACTION PACT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $212k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • LA
    LIFT AS YOU GROW INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • GS
    GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND SERVICE FOUNDATIONINC
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Abuse Counseling and Education Inc

Helping people end abusive behavior

Human Services
2
Family Crisis Center Inc

Provide shelter and relief for victims of domestic abuse

Human Services
3
Safe Homes of Augusta Inc

To provide assistance from domestic violence.

Human Services
4
Abuse Resource Network

Support services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault & other crimes. we serve city and rural populations - men - women & children.

—
5
Adult & Teen Challenge of the Greater South Inc

To assist women who are in physical, emotional, and spiritual need

Human Services
6
Staunton Augusta Church Relief Asso

Provide monetary and food help to the needy in our area.

Religion
7
Committee Against Spouse Abuse Inc

Provide shelter, meals, clothing and counseling for battered women and their children.

Human Services
8
Sullivan County Victim Services Inc

The organization provides counseling and temporary shelter to victims of domestic violence and/or sexual assault.

Unclassified
9
Family Abuse Service of Alamance County Inc

Family abuse services is committed to eliminating intimate partner violence in our community. the agency will provide services and support to surivors and their children. we are committed to the prevention and intervention of intimate…

—
10
Child Abuse Prevention Services of Tuscaloosa Inc

The organizations purpose is to provide services to individuals for the prevention and treatment of child abuse and neglect.

Crime & Legal
11
The Family Effect

To reduce addiction as a leading cause of family collapse and harm to children in south carolina.

Social Science
12
St Clair County Child Advocacy Center

To provide a coordinated, child focused, multi-disciplinary response to child sexual and serious physical abuse in st clair, monroe, and randolph counties.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Hearts and Hands Clinic Inc; the most unlike its peers is Emanuel Co Child Abuse Prevention Ctr. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACTION PACT INC: $212,263 · OtherACTION PACT INCTHE FOOD BANK INC: $177,948 · OtherTHE FOOD BANK INCHOMEBOUND SERVICES INC: $160,985 · OtherHOMEBOUND SERVICES INCRED CROSS: $132,500 · OtherRED CROSSPOSITIVE CHILDHOOD ALLIANCE BULLOCH: $117,080 · OtherPOSITIVE CHILDHOOD ALLIANCE BULLOCHCASA: $79,966 · OtherCASASTATESBORO LIBRARY FAMILY LITERACY: $47,000 · OtherFERST FOUNDATION: $42,508 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $36,000 · Other+3 more: $46,313 · OtherCITIZENS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC: $300,668 · Human ServicesCITIZENS AGAINST VI…+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BULLOCH COUNTY INC: $301,333 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB …THE HEARTS AND HANDS CLINIC INC: $48,400 · HealthBULLOCH ALCOHOL & DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL INC: $11,000 · HealthAREA CHRISTIANS TOGETHER IN SERVICE: $54,000 · ReligionEMANUEL CO CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CTR: $15,000 · Crime & LegalGEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND SERVICE FOUNDATIONINC: $6,679 · Science & Tech
Other$1,052,563Human Services$310,668Youth Development$301,333Health$59,400Religion$54,000Crime & Legal$15,000Science & Tech$6,679

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BULLOCH COUNTY INC: $301,333 over 9y, 5.1% of budgetCITIZENS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC: $300,668 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetACTION PACT INC: $212,263 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK INC: $177,948 over 9y, 29% of budgetHOMEBOUND SERVICES INC: $160,985 over 9y, 54% of budgetAREA CHRISTIANS TOGETHER IN SERVICE: $54,000 over 6y, 8.8% of budgetTHE HEARTS AND HANDS CLINIC INC: $48,400 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetEMANUEL CO CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CTR: $15,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBULLOCH ALCOHOL & DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL INC: $11,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetGEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND SERVICE FOUNDATIONINC: $6,679 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BULLOCH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ACTION PACT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOUND SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds AREA CHRISTIANS TOGETHER IN SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds THE HEARTS AND HANDS CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds EMANUEL CO CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CTR ↗
  • Who funds BULLOCH ALCOHOL & DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERING FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND SERVICE FOUNDATIONINC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Georgia Power Foundation IncGA19× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Btc Community Outreach Inc · Jr Hendley Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Southeast Georgia funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Southeast Georgia. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Southeast Georgia’s filings →

    More from the funding graph