· Public charity
United Way of Southeast Georgia
To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $196,900 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $249,364 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $52,464 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $175k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BULLOCH COUNTY | $35,500 |
| ACTIONPACT | $29,400 |
| FOOD BANK INC | $27,500 |
| CITIZENS AGAINST VIOLENCE | $25,000 |
| CASA | $20,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $15,000 |
| RED CROSS | $12,500 |
| FOSTERING BULLOCH | $10,000 |
| THE LIGHTHOUSE PROJECT | $8,000 |
| BULLOCH MED CONNECTION | $8,000 |
| HEARTS & HANDS CLINIC | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $311k) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BULLOCH COUNTY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $301k · revenue +54%
- CACITIZENS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $301k · revenue +10%
- APACTION PACT INC9× · 2017–2025 · $212k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- LALIFT AS YOU GROW INCone grant, 2024 · $10k
- GSGEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND SERVICE FOUNDATIONINCone grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Helping people end abusive behavior
Provide shelter and relief for victims of domestic abuse
To provide assistance from domestic violence.
Support services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault & other crimes. we serve city and rural populations - men - women & children.
To assist women who are in physical, emotional, and spiritual need
Provide monetary and food help to the needy in our area.
Provide shelter, meals, clothing and counseling for battered women and their children.
The organization provides counseling and temporary shelter to victims of domestic violence and/or sexual assault.
Family abuse services is committed to eliminating intimate partner violence in our community. the agency will provide services and support to surivors and their children. we are committed to the prevention and intervention of intimate…
The organizations purpose is to provide services to individuals for the prevention and treatment of child abuse and neglect.
To reduce addiction as a leading cause of family collapse and harm to children in south carolina.
To provide a coordinated, child focused, multi-disciplinary response to child sexual and serious physical abuse in st clair, monroe, and randolph counties.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Hearts and Hands Clinic Inc and the most unlike its peers is Emanuel Co Child Abuse Prevention Ctr. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BULLOCH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds ACTION PACT INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds HOMEBOUND SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds AREA CHRISTIANS TOGETHER IN SERVICE ↗
- Who funds THE HEARTS AND HANDS CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds EMANUEL CO CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CTR ↗
- Who funds BULLOCH ALCOHOL & DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds FOSTERING FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND SERVICE FOUNDATIONINC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Btc Community Outreach Inc · Jr Hendley Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Southeast Georgia funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.