Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of South Wood & Adams Counties Inc

The mission of the united way of south wood & adams counties, inc.

$399k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.3MYouth Development$943kCommunity Improvement$413kFood & Nutrition$236kEmployment$50kHealth$47kEducation$6k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $380,475, the rows itemized in this filing. The $399,275 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $18,800 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $148k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $227k
$22,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$60,000
THE FAMILY CENTER$60,000
YMCA$54,750
NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION$52,000
FOCUS$35,875
BOY SCOUTS$24,850
CHILD CARING INC$22,000
OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC$15,000
PARK PLACE ADULT DAY CARE$15,000
FAITH IN ACTION$13,500
CENTRAL WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL$11,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES$10,500
BACK PACK FOR KIDS - NEKOOSA SCHOOL DISTRICT$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $204k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JEREMIAH'S CROSSING: $12k → 11%JEREMIAH'S CROSSING: $10k → 11%CENTRAL WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $11k → 16%CENTRAL WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $9k → 16%CENTRAL WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $9k → 16%CENTRAL WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $8k → 16%CENTRAL WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $8k → 16%CENTRAL WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $8k → 16%CENTRAL WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $8k → 16%CENTRAL WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $7k → 16%PARK PLACE ADULT DAY CARE: $15k → 11%PARK PLACE ADULT DAY CARE: $15k → 11%PARK PLACE ADULT DAY CARE: $15k → 11%PARK PLACE ADULT DAY CARE: $15k → 11%PARK PLACE ADULT DAY CARE: $15k → 11%PARK PLACE ADULT DAY CARE: $15k → 11%PARK PLACE ADULT DAY CARE: $15k → 11%PARK PLACE ADULT DAY CARE: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 16 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$3.0M
$11k

Still filing today

81%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionEmploymentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WISCONSIN RAPIDS AREA INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $624k · revenue +95%
  • WR
    WISCONSIN RAPIDS FAMILY CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $485k · revenue +41%
  • NC
    NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $413k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • CW
    CENTRAL WISCONSIN LITERACY COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • RF
    RAPIDS FAMILY BACKPACKS
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northwest Wisconsin Concentrated Employment Program Inc

Our mission at northwest cep is to create connections that will empower individuals and groups to drive workforce and community growth.

Employment
2
Northwest Wisconsin Community Services Agency Inc

To improve the quality of life by providing resources and services within our communities.

Human Services
3
Pathways of Wisconsin Inc

Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.

Human Services
4
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
5
Wisconsin Youth Company Inc

Wisconsin youth company's mission is to engage youth in opportunities to encourage them to be their best selves.

—
6
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Wisconsin Inc

To create and support one-on-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

—
7
Occupational Development Center Inc

To develop the skills of individuals with abilities by providing opportunities for suitable, sustainable employment that result in greater independence. Individuals with abilities to be engaged in valuable work, integrated into their…

Employment
8
Wausau Child Care Inc

The mission of wausau child care inc. is to strengthen child development, families and the community by providing access to safe, high quality early learning for children.

Human Services
9
Child Advocacy Centers of Wisconsin

Establish and maintain child advocacy centers and teams in wisconsin.

Human Services
10
West Central Wisconsin Community Action Agency Inc

The mission of west central wisconsin community action agency, inc. is to take action against poverty by developing the social and economic assets of low-income families and their communities and by working to create a more just and…

—
11
Christian Community Child Center Inc

We believe that all children are special & unique. Our goal is to create a safe, loving environment where children can learn & be nurtured. We offer children 6 wks to 10 yrs a program emphasizing a child's total development: physical,…

Human Services
12
Darlington Community Child Care Center Inc

Provide child care services to middle to low income families located in a financially distressed rural and lower populated southwestern wisconsin region

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of the Wisconsin Rapids Area Inc; the most unlike its peers is Park Place Adult Day Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WISCONSIN RAPIDS FAMILY CENTER INC: $485,000 · OtherWISCONSIN RAPIDS FAMILY CENTER INCJOHN E ALEXANDER YMCA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $397,975 · OtherJOHN E ALEXANDER YMCA COMMUNITY CENTER INCCHILDCARING INC: $153,362 · OtherCHILDCARING INCFAITH IN ACTION OF ADAMS COUNTY: $102,000 · OtherFAITH IN ACTION OF ADAMS COUNTYBACK PACK FOR KIDS - NEKOOSA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $62,000 · Other+3 more: $37,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WISCONSIN RAPIDS AREA INC: $624,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WISCONS…BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $179,850 · Youth DevelopmentBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAGIRL SCOUTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES INC: $77,300 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN …NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $412,675 · Community ImprovementNORTH CENTRAL C…FEEDING OUR COMMUNITIES WITH UNITED SERVICES INC: $209,375 · Food & NutritionPARK PLACE ADULT DAY SERVICES INC: $115,000 · Human ServicesCENTRAL WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $67,000 · Human ServicesJEREMIAH'S CROSSING INC: $21,822 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $50,000 · EmploymentASPIRUS RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL & CLINICS INC: $47,250 · Health
Other$1,237,837Youth Development$881,150Community Improvement$412,675Food & Nutrition$209,375Human Services$203,822Employment$50,000Health$47,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WISCONSIN RAPIDS AREA INC: $624,000 over 8y, 15% of budgetWISCONSIN RAPIDS FAMILY CENTER INC: $485,000 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $412,675 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetJOHN E ALEXANDER YMCA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $397,975 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetFEEDING OUR COMMUNITIES WITH UNITED SERVICES INC: $209,375 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $179,850 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDCARING INC: $153,362 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetPARK PLACE ADULT DAY SERVICES INC: $115,000 over 8y, 6.2% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES INC: $77,300 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAL WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $67,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetASPIRUS RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL & CLINICS INC: $47,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEREMIAH'S CROSSING INC: $21,822 over 3y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WISCONSIN RAPIDS AREA INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN RAPIDS FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN E ALEXANDER YMCA COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING OUR COMMUNITIES WITH UNITED SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CHILDCARING INC ↗
  • Who funds PARK PLACE ADULT DAY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRUS RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL & CLINICS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEREMIAH'S CROSSING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Incourage Community Foundation IncWI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Incourage Community Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Legacy Foundation of Central Wisc · Paper City Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of South Wood & Adams Counties Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of South Wood & Adams Counties Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of South Wood & Adams Counties’ filings →

    More from the funding graph