Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Scott County Indiana Inc

We focus on three primary needs in our community: investing in children and youth, promoting health and independence, and helping families in crisis.

$27k
Granted FY2026still arriving
1
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$137kHealth$91kCommunity Improvement$86kCrime & Legal$52kEducation$21kYouth Development$14kEmployment$11k
02FY2026 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $13,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $27,128 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $14,128 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$13,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$333k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCOTT COUNTY PARTNERSHIP - CLEARINGHOUSE$13,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $123k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%ENGLISHTON PARK: $10k → 12%SCOTT COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $45k → 15%ENGLISHTON PARK: $8k → 12%ENGLISHTON PARK: $6k → 12%CHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCATES INC: $33k → 15%SCOTT COUNTY YMCA: $8k → 15%SCOTT COUNTY YMCA: $7k → 15%SCOTT COUNTY YMCA: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$286k · 7 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against -16% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2026, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$286k
$140k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
-16%

Still filing today

57%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25’26
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CASA OF SCOTT COUNTY INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $52k · revenue +105%
  • SC
    SCOTT COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC
    3× · 2017–2026 · $34k · revenue +56%
  • EP
    ENGLISHTON PARK INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $24k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • SW
    Still Water Individual and Family Therapy Services Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $41k · revenue -37%
  • CA
    CHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCATES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $33k
  • GS
    GREATER SCOTT COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scott County Emergency and Rescue Squad

Rescue in emergency accidents

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Scotland Family Counseling Center Inc

The mission is to support families, individuals, pastors and congregations during challenging times of crises, problems, and opportunities.

Health
3
Scott County Agricultural Horticultural Association Inc
Recreation & Sports
4
Scotts Valley Counseling Center

Scotts Valley Counseling Center is a non-profit agency dedicated to providing high-quality, low cost counseling to the communities of Santa Cruz and Santa Clara Counties. 84% of our clients received therapy in 2014 at low or very low cost,…

—
5
Scott County Thrive Inc

Our mission is to empower vulnerable populations by promoting access to peer support, compassionate care, and comprehensive services that address the intersecting challenges of substance misuse, mental health issues, and those struggling…

Health
6
Stone County Assistance Team

To provide services for victims of crimes.

Crime & Legal
7
Cobb County C U T I E S

Educational and social services to the youth and their families

Human Services
8
Scott County Development Committee Inc

Promote business development in scott city

—
9
Springfield Pregnancy Care Center Inc
Human Services
10
Family Promise of Scotland County Inc

Provide shelter to homeless families in scotland county and provide training to these families so that they may become self sufficient.

Housing & Shelter
11
Casa of Scotts Bluff County

Primary exempt purpose - providing advocates for children in court and domestic issues

Human Services
12
Pregnancy Resource Center

To provide accurate information, free services and support for families facing unexpected pregnancies in Smith County.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scott County Partnership Inc; the most unlike its peers is Englishton Park Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION: $56,361 · OtherNATIONAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATIONHEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $42,750 · OtherHEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATIONGREATER SCOTT COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $19,550 · OtherGREATER SCOTT COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCESCOTT COUNTY KIDS FIRST INC: $11,031 · OtherSCOTT COUNTY KIDS FIRST INCWE CARE: $11,031 · OtherWE CARELEXINGTON GOOD FAITH PRESCHOOL: $11,000 · OtherLEXINGTON GOOD FAITH PRESCHOOLFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH INC OF SCOTTSBURG INDIANA: $9,552 · OtherFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH INC OF SCOTTSBURG IND…KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL INC: $6,900 · OtherSCOTT COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $65,979 · Human ServicesSCOTT COUNTY FAMILY YMCACHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCATES INC: $33,420 · Human ServicesCHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCATES INCENGLISHTON PARK INC: $23,500 · Human ServicesENGLISHTON PARK INCCASA OF SCOTT COUNTY INC: $52,346 · Youth DevelopmentCASA OF SCOTT…Still Water Individual and Family Therapy Services Inc: $41,420 · HealthStill Water …CRADLE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $7,000 · HealthCRADLE PREGN…SCOTT COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC: $34,485 · Community ImprovementSCOTT COU…
Other$168,175Human Services$122,899Youth Development$52,346Health$48,420Community Improvement$34,485

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSCOTT COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $65,979 over 4y, 10% of budgetCASA OF SCOTT COUNTY INC: $52,346 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetStill Water Individual and Family Therapy Services Inc: $41,420 over 1y, 21% of budgetSCOTT COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC: $34,485 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetENGLISHTON PARK INC: $23,500 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetGREATER SCOTT COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $19,550 over 1y, 19% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SCOTT COUNTY FAMILY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF SCOTT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Still Water Individual and Family Therapy Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds SCOTT COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds ENGLISHTON PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER SCOTT COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds CRADLE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Scott County Community Foundation IncIN15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Scott County Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Scott County Indiana Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Scott County Indiana Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Scott County Indiana’s filings →

    More from the funding graph