· Public charity
United Way of Scott County Indiana Inc
We focus on three primary needs in our community: investing in children and youth, promoting health and independence, and helping families in crisis.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $18,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $25,337 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $7,337 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SCOTT COUNTY PARTNERSHIP - CLEARINGHOUSE | $11,000 |
| CRADLE FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $123k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against -18% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- COCASA OF SCOTT COUNTY INC5× · 2017–2023 · $52k · revenue +124%
- EPENGLISHTON PARK INC3× · 2020–2022 · $24k · revenue +20%
- SCSCOTT COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC2× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +56%
Funded once
- SWStill Water Individual and Family Therapy Services Incone grant, 2021 · $41k · revenue -37%
- CACHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCATES INCone grant, 2021 · $33k
- GSGREATER SCOTT COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCEone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rescue in emergency accidents
The mission is to support families, individuals, pastors and congregations during challenging times of crises, problems, and opportunities.
Scotts Valley Counseling Center is a non-profit agency dedicated to providing high-quality, low cost counseling to the communities of Santa Cruz and Santa Clara Counties. 84% of our clients received therapy in 2014 at low or very low cost,…
Our mission is to empower vulnerable populations by promoting access to peer support, compassionate care, and comprehensive services that address the intersecting challenges of substance misuse, mental health issues, and those struggling…
Promote business development in scott city
To work to reduce environmental hazards in the scott county area. the organization is an affiliate of keep america beautiful.
Educational and social services to the youth and their families
To provide services for victims of crimes.
Promote business in scott city
Provide shelter to homeless families in scotland county and provide training to these families so that they may become self sufficient.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scott County Family Ymca and the most unlike its peers is Englishton Park Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SCOTT COUNTY FAMILY YMCA ↗
- Who funds CASA OF SCOTT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Still Water Individual and Family Therapy Services Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds ENGLISHTON PARK INC ↗
- Who funds SCOTT COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER SCOTT COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds CRADLE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Scott County Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Scott County Indiana Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.