Skip to content
United Way of Rutland County Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

United Way of Rutland County Inc

We unite people and resources to facilitate lasting positive change based on community needs.

$123k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$294kHuman Services$231kFood & Nutrition$90kCrime & Legal$83kEmployment$75kYouth Development$64kRecreation & Sports$43kCommunity Improvement$21kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $88,650, the rows itemized in this filing. The $122,900 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $34,250 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $63k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$269k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VERMONT FARMERS FOOD CENTER$13,000
COME ALIVE OUTSIDE$10,000
HOUSING TRUST OF RUTLAND COUN$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF RUTLAN$10,000
SLATE VALLEY UNION SCHOOL DIS$10,000
RUTLAND FREE CLINIC$9,900
REINBOW RIDING$9,250
RUTLAND SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROG$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $241k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAIR HAVEN CONCERN INC: $8k → 12%SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT AREA AGE: $63k → 12%SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT AREA AGE: $63k → 12%VERMONT CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $20k → 12%SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT AREA AGE: $15k → 12%VERMONT CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $15k → 12%NEW STORY: $15k → 12%RUTLAND COUNTY HEAD START: $10k → 12%NEW STORY: $10k → 12%NEW STORY: $8k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $8k → 12%RUTLAND SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROG: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$884k · 18 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
5

Total granted

$884k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+26%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    Southwestern Vermont Council on Aging Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $141k · revenue +62%
  • VH
    VNA & Hospice of the Southwest Region Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $119k · revenue +7%
  • VF
    VERMONT FARMERS MARKET EDUCATION CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $80k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • RC
    RUTLAND CITY RESCUE MISSION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rutland County Parent Child Center Inc

The Center is a resource for family growth and development in Rutland County, Vermont.

Human Services
2
Cooperation Vermont

The mission of cooperation vermont is to build thriving community economic and enviromental democracy.

Community Improvement
3
Vermont Psychological Services Former Behavior Therapy & Psychotherapy

Provide psychology & counseling to members of society who display behavior & psychological problems.

Health
4
Rutland County Pride

Rutland County Pride educates, advocates and celebrates with and for the LGBTQIA2S+ Vermonters and allies.

Civil Rights
5
Valley Health Connections

To provide medical and dental referral services and enrollment services to low income populations in Vermont who are uninsured, underinsured, or at risk of losing insurance

Health
6
Cooperation Vermont Community Land Trust

The mission of cooperation vermont community land trust is to reclaim the commons.

Community Improvement
7
Rutland Mental Health Services Inc

Mental health services

Health
8
Vermont Association of Senior Centers and Meal Providers

To cultivate a unified voice and dynamic network of senior centers, meal providers, and professionals committed to excellence and responsive to the needs of the states growing older population.

Human Services
9
Vermont Congregational Home Inc

Retirement Home - Operation of church sponsored retirement home with 13 rooms and care for up to 15 residents

Human Services
10
Vermont Realtors Charitable Foundation Inc
Public Benefit
11
Windham County Safe Place Child Advocacy & Se Unit/Special Investigation

Provide assistance to children who have been physically or sexually abused and adults who may have been sexually assaulted in windham county, vermont.

Crime & Legal
12
Rutland Regional Chamber of Commerc

Chamber of commerce to support the business community for rutland county vermont.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vermont Catholic Charities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Newstory Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VNA & Hospice of the Southwest Region Inc: $118,500 · OtherVNA & Hospice of the Southwest Regio…VERMONT ADULT LEARNING INC: $75,000 · OtherVERMONT ADULT LEARNING INCARC RUTLAND AREA INC: $22,000 · OtherARC RUTLAND AREA INCPREVENT CHILD ABUSE VERMONT: $21,500 · OtherPREVENT CHILD ABUSE VERMONTBROC COMMUNITY ACTION IN SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT: $21,000 · OtherBROC COMMUNITY ACTION IN SOUTHWESTER…+5 more: $45,280 · Other+5 moreSouthwestern Vermont Council on Aging Inc: $140,570 · Human ServicesSouthwestern Vermont Council…VERMONT CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $34,750 · Human ServicesVERMONT CATHOLIC CHARITIES I…NEWSTORY CENTER INC: $33,000 · Human ServicesNEWSTORY CENTER INCRUTLAND COMMUNITY PROGRAMSINC: $16,500 · Human ServicesRUTLAND COMMUNITY PROGRAMSIN…+2 more: $16,000 · Human Services+2 moreGREEN MOUNTAIN RECOVERY FOUNDATION INC: $67,400 · HealthGREEN MOUNTAIN REC…PARK STREET HEALTHSHARE INC RUTLAND COUNTY HEALTH PARTNERS: $48,152 · HealthPARK STREET HEALTH…REINBOW RIDING LTD: $37,840 · HealthREINBOW RIDING LTDVERMONT FARMERS MARKET EDUCATION CENTER: $80,100 · EducationVERMONT F…THE MENTOR CONNECTOR INC: $34,005 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Girls Club of Rutland County: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentDismas of Vermont Inc: $45,000 · Crime & LegalRutland County Court Diversion and Restorative Justice Center Inc: $16,343 · Crime & LegalCOME ALIVE OUTSIDE: $42,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$303,280Human Services$240,820Health$153,392Education$80,100Youth Development$64,005Crime & Legal$61,343Recreation & Sports$42,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSouthwestern Vermont Council on Aging Inc: $140,570 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetVNA & Hospice of the Southwest Region Inc: $118,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetVERMONT FARMERS MARKET EDUCATION CENTER: $80,100 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetVERMONT ADULT LEARNING INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetGREEN MOUNTAIN RECOVERY FOUNDATION INC: $67,400 over 2y, 11% of budgetPARK STREET HEALTHSHARE INC RUTLAND COUNTY HEALTH PARTNERS: $48,152 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetDismas of Vermont Inc: $45,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCOME ALIVE OUTSIDE: $42,500 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetREINBOW RIDING LTD: $37,840 over 4y, 13% of budgetVERMONT CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $34,750 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MENTOR CONNECTOR INC: $34,005 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetNEWSTORY CENTER INC: $33,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Rutland County: $30,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetARC RUTLAND AREA INC: $22,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE VERMONT: $21,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBROC COMMUNITY ACTION IN SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT: $21,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRUTLAND COMMUNITY PROGRAMSINC: $16,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRutland County Court Diversion and Restorative Justice Center Inc: $16,343 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetHousing Trust of Rutland County Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRUTLAND CITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetWONDERFEET KIDS MUSEUM INC: $5,280 over 1y, 3.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community…Rutland Hospital IncBen & Jerry's Foundat…Price Chopper's Golub…Carris Corporation Fo…Community Bank Na Fou…Vermont Childrens Tru…Vermont FoodbankAgnes M Lindsay TrustThe Windham Foundatio…Peoples United Commun…Ge Aerospace Foundati…
The Vermont Community FoundationVT42.5× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Rutland Hospital Inc · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Carris Corporation Foundation · Community Bank Na Foundation of New England Inc · Vermont Childrens Trust Foundation · Vermont Foodbank · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · The Windham Foundation Inc · Peoples United Community Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Rutland County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Rutland County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 62%
  • Housing Trust of Rutland County Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Rutland Community Programsinc: 94% of income from government
  • Green Mountain Recovery Foundation Inc: 79% of income from government
  • Vermont Adult Learning Inc: 78% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Rutland County: 72% of income from government
  • Southwestern Vermont Council on Aging Inc: 62% of income from government
  • Prevent Child Abuse Vermont: 58% of income from government
  • Newstory Center Inc: 48% of income from government
  • Dismas of Vermont Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Come Alive Outside: 27% of income from government
  • Vna & Hospice of the Southwest Region Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Park Street Healthshare Inc Rutland County Health Partners: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
7rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on United Way of Rutland County’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home