· Public charity
United Way of Posey County Inc
The United Way of Posey County will provide visionary leadership to assess the community needs, mobilize resources, and direct those resources toward services which enhance the quality of life for people living in Posey County.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $278,682 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $302,519 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $23,837 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $145k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $119k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Easterseals Rehabilitation Center - Posey County | $68,000 |
| Posey County Council on Aging | $51,000 |
| Willow Tree of Posey County | $35,116 |
| Christian Church Day Care Center | $22,000 |
| Family Matters | $20,000 |
| American Red Cross of Posey County | $18,000 |
| Albion Fellows Bacon Center | $14,140 |
| Big Brothers Big Sisters | $13,500 |
| New Harmony Ministry Association | $12,000 |
| Easterseals Rehabilitation Center | $10,636 |
| Lampion Center | $9,040 |
| Catholic Charities | $5,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $646k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PCPOSEY COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TASK FORCE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $275k · revenue +22% · 91% of their budget
- CCCHRISTIAN CHURCH DAY CARE CENTER4× · 2020–2023 · $97k · revenue +27%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches5× · 2020–2024 · $90k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF EVANSVILLEone grant, 2024 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Susie's Place promotes the prevention, justice and healing of child victims of abuse and violence while maintaining the comfort and safety of the child as the first priority.
Promote safety, self-sufficiency, hope and healing to those effected by abuse.
To provide temporary housing and other support services to homeless families in the greater Lafayette area of Tippecanoe County, Indiana
Teaming with families to provide high quality child care and education services for all children.
Provide child care and supporting family services to families in union county, indiana.
To aid victims of domestic violence
Prevent domestic violence in auglaize co. ohio
Serve abused and/or neglected children in the Gilmer County area via counseling and other social services.
To promote the healthy development of children and families through quality behavioral and mental health services, community partnerships and advocacy.
Provides community service(family counseling & day care) to the inner of louisville.
It is our mission to provide a child-centered environment, treating each child and family with respect.
Provide resources for low income clients.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Learning Center of Posey County Inc and the most unlike its peers is American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds POSEY COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds POSEY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN CHURCH DAY CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Family Matters of Posey County Indiana Inc ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA ↗
- Who funds ALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER OF POSEY COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE BOARD ↗
- Who funds LAMPION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOMELESS SHELTER OF MT VERNON INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · United Way of Southwestern Indiana Inc · Evansville Endowment Fund Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Posey County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.