Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Portage County Inc

The united way of portage county brings people and resources together to achieve measurable results that improve people's lives and strengthen our community.

$2.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$640k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$6.0MHealth$5.2MYouth Development$3.7MEducation$2.0MFood & Nutrition$1.3MPhilanthropy$430kEmployment$309kCrime & Legal$139kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $102k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.4M
$81,811
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN$640,242
CAP SERVICES INC$486,990
STEVENS POINT AREA YMCA$265,679
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC$229,923
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN$168,060
BIG BROTHER BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC$158,923
SALVATION ARMY$151,982
AGING & DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER OF PORTAGE COUNTY$81,811
MEALS ON WHEELS$81,686
CHILDCARING INC$81,610
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN$50,000
UNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY$47,940
ODC$40,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES$14,086
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - SOMOSET COUNCIL$5,134
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CAP Services Inc: $512k → 10%CAP SERVICES INC: $487k → 10%CAP Services Inc: $429k → 10%CAP Services Inc: $400k → 10%CAP SERVICES INC: $399k → 10%CAP Services Inc: $395k → 10%CAP Services Inc: $363k → 10%CAP Services Inc: $303k → 10%CAP Services Inc: $292k → 10%Evergreen Community Initiatives: $7k → 10%Midstate Independent Living Choices: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 16 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
4

Total granted

$19M
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+17%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CAP SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +3%
  • TY
    The Young Men's Christian Association of Stevens Point Wisconsin Area Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +29%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
    one grant, 2024 · $17k
  • OC
    O'CONNOR CONNECTIVERM LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $14k
  • EC
    EVERGREEN COMMUNITY INITIATIVES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pathways of Wisconsin Inc

Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.

Human Services
2
Marinette County Committee on Aging Inc

Our mission at Marinette County Elderly Services is to assist older persons in maintaining a longer, healthier, and more fulfilled life.

Human Services
3
Portal Inc

To enhance opportunities for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (i/dd) to participate fully in their community as valued neighbors, productive workers and respected citizens. portal, inc. assists more than 200 adults…

Employment
4
Independence of Portage County

The agency provides community based supportive services to individuals with intellectual disabilities and also training and education, so as to increase their independence and advocates for those served. acknowledging family, friends, and…

—
5
North Country Independent Living Inc

To empower people with disabilities

Human Services
6
Tri-County Independent Living Center Inc

To empower citizens with disabilities to be in charge of their lives and participate as members of their communities by advocating for the elimination of societal barriers and striving to achieve community accessibility and acceptance.

Human Services
7
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
8
Community Connections Inc

Provide services for individuals with developmental disabilities.

Human Services
9
Milwaukee Community Service Corps Inc

The milwaukee community service corps (mcsc) is a non-profit vocational training organization providing employment, education and life skills to training youth adults and unemployed and underemployed of milwaukee, wisconsin.

Employment
10
Occupational Development Center Inc

To develop the skills of individuals with abilities by providing opportunities for suitable, sustainable employment that result in greater independence. Individuals with abilities to be engaged in valuable work, integrated into their…

Employment
11
Portage County Children's Services Center

To promote the healthy development of children and families through quality behavioral and mental health services, community partnerships and advocacy.

Health
12
Central Wisconsin Community Action Council Inc

The mission of central wisconsin community action council, inc. (cwcac) is to provide opportunities for services which help low-income individuals and families within our service area achieve self-sufficiency and independence.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cap Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels of Stevens Point. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN: $5,092,209 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSINThe Young Men's Christian Association of Stevens Point Wisconsin Area Inc: $2,526,271 · OtherThe Young Men's Christian Association of Stevens Point Wisconsin Area IncBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF WISCONSIN INC: $1,458,354 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF WISCONSIN INCTHE SALVATION ARMY: $1,432,824 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYADRC OF PORTAGE COUNTY: $764,211 · OtherADRC OF PORTAGE COUNTYMEALS ON WHEELS OF STEVENS POINT: $694,027 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OF STEVENS POINT+7 more: $888,927 · Other+7 moreCAP SERVICES INC: $3,579,155 · Human ServicesCAP SERVICES INC+2 more: $13,422 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE: $1,721,852 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS…GIRL SCOUTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES INC: $308,048 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS …UNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC: $429,580 · PhilanthropyOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $114,576 · Employment
Other$12,856,823Human Services$3,592,577Youth Development$2,029,900Philanthropy$429,580Employment$114,576

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAP SERVICES INC: $3,579,155 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetThe Young Men's Christian Association of Stevens Point Wisconsin Area Inc: $2,526,271 over 9y, 8.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE: $1,721,852 over 9y, 12% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF STEVENS POINT: $694,027 over 9y, 26% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC: $429,580 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES INC: $308,048 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDCARING INC: $217,594 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetBOYSCOUTS OF AMERICA 627 SAMOSET COUNCIL: $215,167 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetSTEVENS POINT CHILD SAFETY CENTER INC: $138,828 over 4y, 53% of budgetOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $114,576 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPORTAGE COUNTY ADVOCATES FOR THE DEVELOP DISABLED INC COMMUNITY PARTNERS PROGRAM: $92,835 over 3y, 84% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAP SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds The Young Men's Christian Association of Stevens Point Wisconsin Area Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF STEVENS POINT ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDCARING INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYSCOUTS OF AMERICA 627 SAMOSET COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds STEVENS POINT CHILD SAFETY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PORTAGE COUNTY ADVOCATES FOR THE DEVELOP DISABLED INC COMMUNITY PARTNERS PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN COMMUNITY INITIATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDSTATE INDEPENDENT LIVING CHOICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Central Wisconsin IncWI22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Central Wisconsin Inc · Ba & Esther Greenheck Foundation · Dudley Foundation Inc · Sentry Insurance Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of North Central Wisconsin Inc · Church Mutual Insurance Company Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Portage County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Portage County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Portage County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph