Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Portage County Inc

The united way of portage county brings people and resources together to achieve measurable results that improve people's lives and strengthen our community.

$2.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$640k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$6.0MHealth$5.2MYouth Development$3.7MEducation$2.0MFood & Nutrition$1.3MPhilanthropy$430kEmployment$309kCrime & Legal$139kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $102k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.4M
$81,811
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN$640,242
CAP SERVICES INC$486,990
STEVENS POINT AREA YMCA$265,679
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC$229,923
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN$168,060
BIG BROTHER BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC$158,923
SALVATION ARMY$151,982
AGING & DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER OF PORTAGE COUNTY$81,811
MEALS ON WHEELS$81,686
CHILDCARING INC$81,610
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN$50,000
UNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY$47,940
ODC$40,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES$14,086
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - SOMOSET COUNCIL$5,134
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CAP Services Inc: $512k → 10%CAP SERVICES INC: $487k → 10%CAP Services Inc: $429k → 10%CAP Services Inc: $400k → 10%CAP SERVICES INC: $399k → 10%CAP Services Inc: $395k → 10%CAP Services Inc: $363k → 10%CAP Services Inc: $303k → 10%CAP Services Inc: $292k → 10%Evergreen Community Initiatives: $7k → 10%Midstate Independent Living Choices: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19M · 16 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
4

Total granted

$19M
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+17%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CAP SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +3%
  • TY
    The Young Men's Christian Association of Stevens Point Wisconsin Area Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +29%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
    one grant, 2024 · $17k
  • OC
    O'CONNOR CONNECTIVERM LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $14k
  • EC
    EVERGREEN COMMUNITY INITIATIVES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue -2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connections for Life

Empowering people with disabilities by providing services that promote independence, equality and intergration, enhancing their quality of life.

Health
2
Innovative Services Inc

Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.

Human Services
3
Pathways of Wisconsin Inc

Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.

Human Services
4
Independence of Portage County

The agency provides community based supportive services to individuals with intellectual disabilities and also training and education, so as to increase their independence and advocates for those served. acknowledging family, friends, and…

5
Portal Inc

To enhance opportunities for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (i/dd) to participate fully in their community as valued neighbors, productive workers and respected citizens. portal, inc. assists more than 200 adults…

Employment
6
Senior Community Services Inc

To promote independent and meaningful living for older adults through direct services and programs in the home and community.

Human Services
7
United Way of Marquette County

Focusing community resources to meet community needs the United Way of Marquette County works to advance the common good by connecting people with health and human care issues they are concerned about and to provide the oversight the…

8
Achieving Independence and Mobility Cil

Independent living services for persons with disabilities.

Human Services
9
Great Lakes Community Action Partnership

The mission of great lakes community action partnership is to create partnerships and opportunites to help individuals, families and communities thrive.

Human Services
10
Turning Point Inc

Turning point empowers survivors of domestic and sexual violence through comprehensive services and resources while advocating for community action to end oppression and violence.

Human Services
11
Boys & Girls Club of Meriden Inc

Provide opportunities for positive and healthy growth for youth in our communities.

Youth Development
12
Tri-County Independent Living Center Inc

To empower citizens with disabilities to be in charge of their lives and participate as members of their communities by advocating for the elimination of societal barriers and striving to achieve community accessibility and acceptance.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cap Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels of Stevens Point. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN — $5,092,209 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSINThe Young Men's Christian Association of Stevens Point Wisconsin Area Inc — $2,526,271 · OtherThe Young Men's Christian Association of Stevens Point Wisconsin Area IncBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF WISCONSIN INC — $1,458,354 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF WISCONSIN INCTHE SALVATION ARMY — $1,432,824 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYADRC OF PORTAGE COUNTY — $764,211 · OtherADRC OF PORTAGE COUNTYMEALS ON WHEELS OF STEVENS POINT — $694,027 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OF STEVENS POINT+7 more — $888,927 · Other+7 moreCAP SERVICES INC — $3,579,155 · Human ServicesCAP SERVICES INC+2 more — $13,422 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE — $1,721,852 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS…GIRL SCOUTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES INC — $308,048 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS …UNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC — $429,580 · PhilanthropyOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC — $114,576 · Employment
Other$12,856,823Human Services$3,592,577Youth Development$2,029,900Philanthropy$429,580Employment$114,576

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAP SERVICES INC — $3,579,155 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetThe Young Men's Christian Association of Stevens Point Wisconsin Area Inc — $2,526,271 over 9y, 8.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE — $1,721,852 over 9y, 12% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF STEVENS POINT — $694,027 over 9y, 26% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC — $429,580 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES INC — $308,048 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDCARING INC — $217,594 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetBOYSCOUTS OF AMERICA 627 SAMOSET COUNCIL — $215,167 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetSTEVENS POINT CHILD SAFETY CENTER INC — $138,828 over 4y, 53% of budgetOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC — $114,576 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPORTAGE COUNTY ADVOCATES FOR THE DEVELOP DISABLED INC COMMUNITY PARTNERS PROGRAM — $92,835 over 3y, 84% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAP SERVICES INC
  • Who funds The Young Men's Christian Association of Stevens Point Wisconsin Area Inc
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF STEVENS POINT
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES INC
  • Who funds CHILDCARING INC
  • Who funds BOYSCOUTS OF AMERICA 627 SAMOSET COUNCIL
  • Who funds STEVENS POINT CHILD SAFETY CENTER INC
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC
  • Who funds PORTAGE COUNTY ADVOCATES FOR THE DEVELOP DISABLED INC COMMUNITY PARTNERS PROGRAM
  • Who funds EVERGREEN COMMUNITY INITIATIVES INC
  • Who funds MIDSTATE INDEPENDENT LIVING CHOICES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Central Wisconsin IncWI22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Central Wisconsin Inc · Ba & Esther Greenheck Foundation · Dudley Foundation Inc · Sentry Insurance Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of North Central Wisconsin Inc · Church Mutual Insurance Company Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Portage County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph