· Public charity
United Way of Pierce County
We mobilize and unite the caring power of Pierce County to tackle our community's toughest challenges to improve lives in measurable and lasting ways.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 39 grants below total $1,041,345 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,889,286 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,847,941 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $66k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $527k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $448k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Tacoma Community House | $172,000 |
| Multicultural Child and Family Hope Center | $100,000 |
| Goodwill of the Olympic and Rainier Region | $76,000 |
| CJK Community Homes | $50,000 |
| New Phoebe House Association | $50,000 |
| Associated Ministries of Tacoma | $48,000 |
| Making A Difference Foundation | $45,000 |
| Help A Student Fund | $36,070 |
| St Vincent DePaul Society | $35,000 |
| Mi Centro | $30,000 |
| YWCA Pierce County | $27,000 |
| LASA | $25,000 |
| Sound Outreach | $22,600 |
| Food Backpacks 4 Kids | $20,000 |
| Tacoma Community College | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
39 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $201k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SSSOUTH SOUND OUTREACH SERVICES3× · 2021–2025 · $478k · revenue +30%
- MAMAKING A DIFFERENCE FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $202k · revenue +14%
- MCMULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER6× · 2020–2025 · $200k · revenue +453%
Funded once
- WRWASHINGTON RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION EDUCATION FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue +67%
- CPClover Park Technical Collegeone grant, 2021 · $56k
- CICOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LAKEWOOD INCone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To empower families experiencing housing insecurity through intervention, prevention,and stabilization services.
Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.
Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…
Housing connector partners with property owners and managers to lower barriers to housing and increase our region's affordable housing capacity.
Housing Counseling Services
To serve diverse households fleeing domestic violence with equitable, client-centered services that are inclusive, foster long-term self-sufficiency and promote access to permanent housing and community resources.hope - through compassion…
LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.
To advance the health of our population by eliminating health disparities including promoting equitable access to high quality and cost effective health and human services and resources, to prevent disease and improve health, to improve…
KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…
United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.
Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…
Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Associated Ministries of Tacoma-Pierce County and the most unlike its peers is Childrens International Health Relief. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Tacoma Community House ↗
- Who funds SOUTH SOUND OUTREACH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Goodwill of the Olympics and Rainier Region ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED MINISTRIES OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds GREATER TACOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAKING A DIFFERENCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEW PHOEBE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds KOREAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds LASA ↗
- Who funds DIABETES ASSOC OF PIERCE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HELPING HAND HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Nourish Pierce County ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF TACOMA ↗
- Who funds YWCA PIERCE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds MI CENTRO ↗
- Who funds CARES OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds LINDQUIST DENTAL CLINIC FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds PIONEER HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Tacoma Urban League ↗
- Who funds PEACE COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CJK COMMUNITY HOMES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF PENINSULA ↗
- Who funds PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF TACOMA SOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL ↗
- Who funds Shared Housing Services ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF PUYALLUP ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · Gary E Milgard Family Foundation- Sunshine · Woodworth Family Foundation · Fuchsg & M Fdn Tai · Kilworth Florence Char Tr Fndn · Multicare Health System · The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Medina Foundation · Forest Foundation · The Bamford Foundation · Gary E Milgard Family Foundation-Cari
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Pierce County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.