· Public charity
United Way of Parker County
To activate community resources through fundraising efforts to make the greatest possible community impact
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $113,619 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $127,106 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $13,487 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $101k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTER OF HOPE | $28,137 |
| MANNA STOREHOUSE | $21,060 |
| SANCTIFIED HOPE | $19,920 |
| Individual grant recipient | $19,000 |
| PARKER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING | $12,450 |
| CASA | $7,052 |
| FREEDOM HOUSE | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $995k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PCPARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE INC8× · 2017–2025 · $320k · revenue +45%
- MSMANNA STOREHOUSE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $294k · revenue +153%
- PCPARKER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING INC8× · 2017–2025 · $172k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- PCPARKER COUNTY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVone grant, 2017 · $23k · revenue -14%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $14k
- PMPCCA MEALS ON WHEELSone grant, 2024 · $12k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Family promise is part of a national organization that provides food, shelter, and support services during resettlement of homeless families in church facilities and temporary housing. we also provide cars for our guests to drive to work…
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
Provide temporary shelter and assistance
To provide shelter to abused families.
Payne County Youth Services, Inc. is dedicated to providing free quality services for the positive development and recovery of children, youth, and families.
To provide trained court appointed volunteers to serve as advocates for the best interests of abused and neglected children in harrison county texas
Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…
Child Advocacy Services
Provide food for needy people in county
Assist residents and transients of Smith County with basic needs, including food, clothing, and emergency utility assistance
Meet the short-term needs of people in crisis situations by providing immediate help in the form of food & financial assistance. Long-term assistance may also be provided.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Freedom House and the most unlike its peers is Sanctified Hope Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds MANNA STOREHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds PARKER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE ↗
- Who funds SANCTIFIED HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER CARE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds PARKER COUNTY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERV ↗
- Who funds TEXAS NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CASA HOPE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Parker County Health Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Parker County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.