Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Nelson County

fundraising organization for other 501c3 human and health service agencies serving Marion, Nelson and Washingon Counties in Kentucky

$199k
Granted FY2018
11
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Human Services$128kFood & Nutrition$57kCrime & Legal$27kHousing & Shelter$24kHealth$23kRecreation & Sports$12kEducation$11k
02FY2018 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $141,400 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $198,834 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $57,434 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k4 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $115k
$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$483k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Caring Place$30,000
Community Action of Nelson County$18,500
Bread for Life Food Pantry$15,000
Nelcasa$14,000
Nelson County Community Clinic$13,000
Bardstown Back Pack Program$12,000
Bethany Haven$12,000
New Hope Food Bank$7,000
Springhaven Domestic Violence$7,000
Community Action of Central KY$6,500
Central Kentucky Head Start$6,400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Community Action of Nelson County: $19k → 11%Springhaven Domestic Violence: $8k → 15%Community Action of Nelson County: $19k → 11%Bread for Life Food Pantry: $15k → 11%Community Action of Central KY: $7k → 19%Bread for Life Food Pantry: $15k → 11%Springhaven Domestic Violence: $7k → 11%Community Action of Central KY: $5k → 11%New Life Center: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$277k · 11 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +151% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$277k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+151%
+0%

Still filing today

73%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ABC Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $37k · revenue +154%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL GEORGIA INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $30k · revenue +155%
  • NI
    NELCASA INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $27k · revenue +177%

Funded once

  • NL
    NEW LIFE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Beginnings Christian Care Inc

New Beginnings offers pregnancy testing, limited ultrasound referrals, helps women bring their babies to term and become responsible, loving mothers.

2
Northstar Advocacy Center

This center brings victims of domestic violence and sexual assault together to provide a safe and nurturing place to learn and grow through crisis and case management, court advocacy, support groups and 24 hour crisis hotline.

Human Services
3
Family Crisis Center

Promote safety, self-sufficiency, hope and healing to those effected by abuse.

Health
4
Northeast Ky Community Action Agency Inc

The organization operates numerous programs that aid children and low income or aged adults.

Human Services
5
Fannin County Family Crisis Center

To aid victims of domestic violence

Human Services
6
Care Net Pregnancy Center of Central Texas

Counseling and assistance for unplanned pregnancy.

Health
7
Children's Safety Center

Child abuse victim assistance

Crime & Legal
8
New Choices Inc

The mission of new choices, inc. is to provide shelby county, ohio with the immediate care needs for individuals of domestic violence.

Human Services
9
Family Crisis Shelter Inc

To provide safe shelter, advocacy, counseling, referrals and support to all victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.

Civil Rights
10
Committee Against Spouse Abuse Inc

Provide shelter, meals, clothing and counseling for battered women and their children.

Human Services
11
Safe Haven Inc

As an advocate for women and children of domestic violence and sexual assault, safe haven inc. strives to provide emergency shelter and crisis intervention in a loving, caring and secure environment that will uphold their dignity and…

12
The Elizabeth House Maternity Home

Crisis Pregnancy Center

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nelcasa Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Caring Place a Center for Abused Women and Children Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CARING PLACE A CENTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND CHILDREN INC — $60,000 · OtherTHE CARING PLACE A CENTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND CHILDREN…NELCASA INC — $27,000 · OtherNELCASA INCBardstown Back Pack Program — $24,000 · OtherBardstown Back Pack ProgramNEW HOPE ATHLETIC CLUB INC — $14,500 · OtherNEW HOPE ATHLETIC CLUB INCNATIONAL HEAD START ASSOCIATION — $11,400 · OtherNATIONAL HEAD START ASSOCIATIONABC Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc — $37,000 · Human ServicesABC Crisis Pregnancy Center IncSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL GEORGIA INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL GEORGIA I…SPRINGHAVEN INC — $14,500 · Human ServicesSPRINGHAVEN INCCENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC — $11,500 · Human ServicesCENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNC…NEW LIFE CENTER INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesBETHANY HAVEN INC — $24,000 · Crime & LegalBETHANY H…NELSON COUNTY COMMUNITY CLINIC INC — $23,000 · HealthNELSON CO…
Other$136,900Human Services$98,000Crime & Legal$24,000Health$23,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CARING PLACE A CENTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND CHILDREN INC — $60,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetABC Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc — $37,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL GEORGIA INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNELCASA INC — $27,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetBETHANY HAVEN INC — $24,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetNELSON COUNTY COMMUNITY CLINIC INC — $23,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetNATIONAL HEAD START ASSOCIATION — $11,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels IncKY13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Nelson County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to United Way of Nelson County?

    Find your warmest path to United Way of Nelson County through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph