Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Monroelenawee Counties Inc

Fundraising for human services

$333k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$91k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$2.1MCrime & Legal$456kPhilanthropy$320kHealth$263kHousing & Shelter$169kRecreation & Sports$121kPublic Safety & Disaster$16k
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $324,296, the rows itemized in this filing. The $332,934 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,638 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $133k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $163k
$12,706
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONROE COUNTY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM$91,034
FAMILY COUNSELINGSHELTER SERVICES$72,389
CHILD CARE NETWORK WASHTENAW 4-C$22,602
PAULAS HOUSE$21,699
CASA OF MONROE COUNTY$14,929
HOLIDAY CAMP$14,762
LEGAL SERVICES OF S CENTRAL MI$13,769
VARIOUS$12,706
CANCER CENTER - PROMEDICA$11,351
GABBY'S LADDER INC$11,257
THE MON-ARC OF MONROE INC$10,060
MONROE COUNTY SENIOR LEGAL SERVICE$9,000
CATHERINE COBB SAFE HOUSE$6,384
BEDFORD SENIOR CENTER$6,202
DUNDEE SENIOR CENTER$6,152
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CATHERINE COBB SAFE HOUSE: $9k → 12%CHILD CARE NETWORK WASHTENAW 4-C: $30k → 14%CATHERINE COBB SAFE HOUSE: $8k → 12%CHILD CARE NETWORK WASHTENAW 4-C: $30k → 14%CATHERINE COBB SAFE HOUSE: $7k → 12%CHILD CARE NETWORK WASHTENAW 4-C: $27k → 14%CATHERINE COBB SAFE HOUSE: $7k → 12%CHILD CARE NETWORK WASHTENAW 4-C: $27k → 14%CATHERINE COBB SAFE HOUSE: $7k → 12%CHILD CARE NETWORK WASHTENAW 4-C: $26k → 14%CATHERINE COBB SAFE HOUSE: $6k → 12%CHILD CARE NETWORK WASHTENAW 4-C: $24k → 14%CATHERINE COBB SAFE HOUSE: $6k → 12%CHILD CARE NETWORK WASHTENAW 4-C: $23k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 10%FRENCHTOWN SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $9k → 10%FRENCHTOWN SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $8k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $6k → 10%FRENCHTOWN SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $5k → 10%MONROE COUNTY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM: $141k → 10%MONROE COUNTY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM: $118k → 10%MONROE COUNTY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM: $105k → 10%MONROE COUNTY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM: $104k → 10%MONROE COUNTY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM: $94k → 10%MONROE COUNTY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM: $91k → 10%MONROE COUNTY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM: $87k → 10%THE MON-ARC OF MONROE INC: $20k → 10%THE MON-ARC OF MONROE INC: $18k → 10%THE MON-ARC OF MONROE INC: $13k → 10%THE MON-ARC OF MONROE INC: $11k → 10%THE MON-ARC OF MONROE INC: $10k → 10%THE MON-ARC OF MONROE INC: $10k → 10%DUNDEE SENIOR CENTER: $13k → 10%DUNDEE SENIOR CENTER: $13k → 10%DUNDEE SENIOR CENTER: $9k → 10%THE MON-ARC OF MONROE INC: $10k → 10%DUNDEE SENIOR CENTER: $9k → 10%DUNDEE SENIOR CENTER: $9k → 10%DUNDEE SENIOR CENTER: $8k → 10%DUNDEE SENIOR CENTER: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 18 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

$3.5M
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+11%

Still filing today

83%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MONROE COUNTY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM
    7× · 2018–2024 · $741k · revenue +103%
  • FC
    FAMILY COUNSELING & SHELTER SERVICE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $642k · revenue +36%
  • MA
    Michigan Advocacy Program
    7× · 2018–2024 · $195k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • HF
    Habitat for Humanity of Monroe Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $14k · revenue +11%
  • WB
    WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Monroe County Sheltercare Inc

To assist at-risk individuals

—
2
Monroe Senior and Community Center

To provide services and programs for residents of monroe, iowa area that promote their wellbeing, support their independence and encourage their involvement in community life.

Human Services
3
Monroe City Senior Nutrition Center

To provide services for the elderly

Food & Nutrition
4
Monroe County Council on Aging Inc

To provide services to senior citizens of Monroe County, West Virinia

Human Services
5
Monroe Senior Citizens Center Inc

To provided services to seniors

—
6
Women's Resources of Monroe Cty Inc

Counseling, education, shelter and support for anyone impacted by domestic and sexual abuse.

Human Services
7
Michigan Legal Services

Provide free legal assistance to indigent and low income persons

Crime & Legal
8
Human Support Services

To provide services to Monroe County residents with mental health, developmental disabilities and substance abuse needs.

Health
9
Manistee County Council On Aging

Provide services for senior citizens both through the center and to those with limited resources or homebound.

Human Services
10
Milan Seniors for Healthy Living

Empowering healthy aging and enhancing quality of life for seniors and their support networks through programs and services in the milan, mi community.

Human Services
11
Monroe County Meals On Wheels Inc

Monroe county meals on wheels provides meals to individuals who are substantially homebound due to physical or mental challenges and are unable to shop and/or prepare meals for themselves.

—
12
Family Medical Center of

Family Medical Center of Michigan, Inc. is dedicated to quality and excellence in providing comprehensive, cost-effective primary and preventive health care regardless of age, ethnic background, or ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Monroe County Opportunity Program; the most unlike its peers is Holiday Camp Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MONROE COUNTY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM: $740,940 · Human ServicesMONROE COUNTY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAMChild Care Network: $186,580 · Human ServicesChild Care NetworkTHE MON-ARC OF MONROE INC: $92,469 · Human ServicesTHE MON-ARC OF MONROE INCDUNDEE SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $67,049 · Human ServicesDUNDEE SENIOR CITIZENS CENTERFAMILY COUNSELING & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF LENAWEE COUNTY: $50,435 · Human Services+2 more: $38,041 · Human ServicesFAMILY COUNSELING & SHELTER SERVICE: $641,587 · HealthFAMILY COUNSELING & SHELTER S…GABBY'S LADDER INC: $143,178 · HealthGABBY'S LADDER INCMERCY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $109,770 · HealthMERCY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPO…+1 more: $10,000 · HealthCASA OF MONROE COUNTY: $253,874 · OtherCASA OF MONROE COUNTYARTHUR LESOW COMMUNITY CENTER: $130,840 · OtherARTHUR LESOW COMMUNIT…SALVATION ARMY HARBOR LIGHT: $127,195 · OtherSALVATION ARMY HARBOR…HOLIDAY CAMP ASSOCIATION: $120,781 · OtherHOLIDAY CAMP ASSOCIAT…+1 more: $13,632 · OtherUNITED WAY OF MONROELENAWEE COUNTIES INC: $320,286 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY…Michigan Advocacy Program: $194,506 · Crime & LegalMonroe County Senior Legal Services: $78,683 · Crime & LegalWOMEN EMPOWERING WOMEN INC: $155,536 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$1,175,514Health$904,535Other$646,322Philanthropy$320,286Crime & Legal$273,189Housing & Shelter$155,536

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMONROE COUNTY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM: $740,940 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetFAMILY COUNSELING & SHELTER SERVICE: $641,587 over 7y, 18% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MONROELENAWEE COUNTIES INC: $320,286 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetMichigan Advocacy Program: $194,506 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetChild Care Network: $186,580 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetWOMEN EMPOWERING WOMEN INC: $155,536 over 7y, 8.8% of budgetGABBY'S LADDER INC: $143,178 over 7y, 11% of budgetARTHUR LESOW COMMUNITY CENTER: $130,840 over 3y, 24% of budgetHOLIDAY CAMP ASSOCIATION: $120,781 over 7y, 69% of budgetMERCY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $109,770 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MON-ARC OF MONROE INC: $92,469 over 7y, 8.4% of budgetMonroe County Senior Legal Services: $78,683 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetDUNDEE SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $67,049 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetFAMILY COUNSELING & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF LENAWEE COUNTY: $50,435 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetFRENCHTOWN SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $22,499 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,542 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Monroe Inc: $13,632 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MONROE COUNTY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY COUNSELING & SHELTER SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MONROELENAWEE COUNTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Michigan Advocacy Program ↗
  • Who funds Child Care Network ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN EMPOWERING WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds GABBY'S LADDER INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTHUR LESOW COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HOLIDAY CAMP ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MERCY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MON-ARC OF MONROE INC ↗
  • Who funds Monroe County Senior Legal Services ↗
  • Who funds DUNDEE SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY COUNSELING & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF LENAWEE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FRENCHTOWN SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Monroe Inc ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Wm M & a Cafaro Family FoundationOH13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Wm M & a Cafaro Family Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Monroelenawee Counties Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Monroelenawee Counties Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Monroelenawee Counties’ filings →

    More from the funding graph