Skip to content
United Way of Lawrence County Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

United Way of Lawrence County Inc

United way of Lawrence County works with member agencies and a network of other community partners to provide comprehensive and collaborative solutions that help local residents improve their lives.

$121k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$443kYouth Development$289kHuman Services$200kCrime & Legal$77kPublic Safety & Disaster$66kHealth$46kAnimals$27kEducation$25kOther$0
02FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $85,114, the rows itemized in this filing. The $120,516 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $35,402 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $61k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILIES FOREVERTHE REC$25,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE CO$15,000
CITY OF BEDFORD$11,114
LOVE NEVER FAILS OUTREACH MINISTRIE$10,000
HOOSIER TRAILS BSA$9,000
STONEGATE ARTS & EDUC CENTER INC$7,500
LIFE$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS HH: $14k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS HH: $13k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS HH: $13k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS HH: $13k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS HH: $13k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$716k · 9 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$716k
$25k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Crime & LegalYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE CO
    6× · 2017–2022 · $289k · revenue +116%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2017–2021 · $66k · revenue +46%
  • FF
    FATHER FOREVER COALITION INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $38k · revenue +404% · 40% of their budget

Funded once

  • N
    NLCS
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lawrenceville Corporation

To act as a catalyst and conduit for responsible growth and reinvestment in the lawrenceville community.

Community Improvement
2
Lagrange County Economic Development Corporation

The lagrange county economic development corporation is the single point of contact for economic development efforts in lagrange county, indiana. we work with regional, state and federal partners to support and encourgage our clients'…

Community Improvement
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
Lawrence County Economic Growth Council Inc

To collaboratively plan for and guide the economic development of lawrence county, indiana. to faciliate the expansion and retention of existing business; to aggressively recruit new business; and to support the development of a quality of…

Community Improvement
5
Lafayette General Foundation Inc

The lafayette general foundation was created to support lafayette general health (lgh), acadiana's only community-owned, nonprofit health system. we exist to help fulfill lgh's mission, to restore, maintain, and improve health. our role is…

Health
6
St Vincent Frankfort Hospital Foundation Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. Our Catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

—
7
Lawrence County Chamber of Commerce

Community and economic development

Community Improvement
8
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Lawrence County Industrial Development Council

To promote business development within lawrence county, illinois.

—
10
St Vincent Hospital Foundation Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. Our Catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually centered, holistic care,…

Health
11
Jay County Drug Prevention Coalition Inc

The mission of jay county drug prevention coalition (jcdpc) is to empower youth and adults through education, awareness, advocacy, and relationships to strengthen an improved quality of life for all. our goals and focus are to (1) promote…

Health
12
Lawrence County Coalition

The lawrence county coalition is a volunteer driven non-profit organization whose mission is to mobilize the community to promote healthy, positive and substance-free lifestyles.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation Partnership Inc; the most unlike its peers is American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $325,050 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION PARTNERSHIP INCORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $118,200 · PhilanthropyORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE CO: $289,050 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAWR…LAWRENCE INTERFAITH ENDEAVOR INC: $96,992 · OtherLAWRENCE INTERFAITH EN…THE SALVATION ARMY: $55,466 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYHOOSIER TRAILS BSA: $27,000 · OtherHOOSIER TRAILS BSANLCS: $25,000 · OtherNLCSCITY OF BEDFORD: $21,114 · OtherCITY OF BEDFORDLOVE NEVER FAILS: $10,000 · OtherPRISONER AND COMMUNITY TOGETHER PACT INC: $77,074 · Crime & LegalPRISONER A…FATHER FOREVER COALITION INC: $37,500 · Crime & LegalFATHER FOR…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $65,840 · Human ServicesSt Vincent Dunn Hospital Inc: $46,191 · HealthSTONEGATE ARTS & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $7,500 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$443,250Youth Development$289,050Other$235,572Crime & Legal$114,574Human Services$65,840Health$46,191Community Improvement$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $325,050 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE CO: $289,050 over 6y, 10% of budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $118,200 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetLAWRENCE INTERFAITH ENDEAVOR INC: $96,992 over 6y, 8.6% of budgetPRISONER AND COMMUNITY TOGETHER PACT INC: $77,074 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $65,840 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSt Vincent Dunn Hospital Inc: $46,191 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFATHER FOREVER COALITION INC: $37,500 over 2y, 40% of budgetSTONEGATE ARTS & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $7,500 over 1y, 5.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Duke Energy FoundationAmazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation Partnership IncIN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Partnership Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Lawrence County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Lawrence County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports $33k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Lawrence County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home