Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Kankakee County Inc

To improve, consistently and measurably, the quality of life for all thepeople of kankakee county by raising and distributing funds, mobilizingcommunity resources and encouraging solutions to the community's health andhuman service needs.

$202k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$1.1MEmployment$174kHousing & Shelter$131kHealth$83kCrime & Legal$51kPublic Safety & Disaster$34kEducation$16kYouth Development$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $193,647, the rows itemized in this filing. The $201,747 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,100 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $174k
$13,700
Median grant
1
States reached
$872k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$32,500
HELEN WHEELER CENTER FOR COMM$28,400
CLOVE ALLIANCE$28,300
CHILD NETWORK$20,400
CENTER OF HOPE$13,700
IROQOUIS MENTAL HEALTH$13,700
VARIOUS ENTITIES$13,137
Individual grant recipient$12,800
PATH INC$10,610
UCP$9,800
KANKAKEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,200
FORTITUDE$5,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AUNT MARTHAS: $8k → 14%GARDEN OF PRAYER YOUTH CENTER: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 23 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
10

Total granted

$1.6M
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+8%

Still filing today

22%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CN
    CHILD NETWORK INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $114k · revenue +172%
  • CA
    CLOVE ALLIANCE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $55k · revenue +20%
  • TA
    THE ARC OF IROQUOIS COUNTY
    3× · 2019–2021 · $45k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $16k
  • OA
    ONARGA ACADEMY
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
  • IC
    IROQUOIS COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Illinois Institute for Children

Providing Social Services to Families including Child Care

Human Services
2
Iris Family Support Center Inc

Iris family support center, formerly known as scan, protects children, prepares parents, strengthens families and educates our community to stop child abuse and neglect.

Human Services
3
Illinois Self-Advocacy Alliance

The Illinois Self-Advocacy Alliance is a statewide network of self-advocates, self-advocacy groups, and allies in Illinois. We support people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) to develop self-advocacy skills so they…

Civil Rights
4
Growing Strong Sexual Assault Center

Counsel sexual assault victims and family members.

Health
5
Family & Children Services Inc

Family & children services strengthens the safety and well being of children, individuals and families; accomplished by providing a comprehensive array of critical human services.

Human Services
6
Center for Family Services

Administering an array of critical, intensive therapeutic interventions and/or facilitation services to emotionally and behaviorally disturbed clients for whom DCFS is legally responsible in order to stabilize their traditional or home of…

Human Services
7
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
8
Children's Bureau Inc

Empowering individuals to build stronger families and communities.

Human Services
9
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Cook County

CASA of Cook County's vision is to protect abused and neglected children by providing them in court, a safe and permanent home, and an opportunity to grow, learn and thrive.

Crime & Legal
10
Grand Prairie Services Llc

The provision of holistic emotional and behavioral health services for individuals, families and communities with an emphasis on recovery and optimal functioning.

Human Services
11
Family and Children's Services of Centra

To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.

Human Services
12
Judson Center Inc

To provide expert, comprehensive services that strengthen children, adults and families impacted by abuse and neglect, autism, developmental, behavioral and physical health challenges so they can achieve whole health, well-being and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aunt Martha's Health and Wellness Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fortitude Community Outreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $224,856 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES INCHELEN WHEELER CENTER FOR COMM: $173,699 · OtherHELEN WHEELER CENTER FOR COMMVARIOUS ENTITIES: $122,208 · OtherVARIOUS ENTITIESYWCA: $118,826 · OtherYWCAYMCA: $115,655 · OtherYMCAHARBOR HOUSE: $88,258 · OtherHARBOR HOUSEPATH INC: $62,273 · OtherKANKAKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY SER: $61,415 · OtherCLOVE ALLIANCE: $54,685 · OtherKC - CASA: $52,210 · Other+22 more: $444,513 · Other+22 moreCHILD NETWORK INC: $114,356 · Housing & ShelterAUNT MARTHA'S HEALTH AND WELLNESS INC: $7,542 · Human ServicesGARDEN OF PRAYER YOUTH CENTER INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $6,595 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,518,598Housing & Shelter$114,356Human Services$15,042Crime & Legal$6,595

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILD NETWORK INC: $114,356 over 7y, 6.9% of budgetCLOVE ALLIANCE: $54,685 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTHE ARC OF IROQUOIS COUNTY: $44,878 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $42,698 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFortitude Community Outreach: $16,795 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetAUNT MARTHA'S HEALTH AND WELLNESS INC: $7,542 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARDEN OF PRAYER YOUTH CENTER INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $6,595 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILD NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CLOVE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF IROQUOIS COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds Fortitude Community Outreach ↗
  • Who funds AUNT MARTHA'S HEALTH AND WELLNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds GARDEN OF PRAYER YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Kankakee County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Kankakee County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Kankakee County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph