Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Jefferson County

To increase the organized capacity of people to care for one another through the support of local united way agencies.

$126k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$397kHealth$252kFood & Nutrition$227kHousing & Shelter$164kPublic Safety & Disaster$141kCrime & Legal$112kYouth Development$80kReligion$8k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $111k
$13,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$424k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
A CARING PLACE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$15,833
OHIO VALLEY HEALTH CENTER$15,400
ALIVE INC$15,000
OHIO VALLEY YOUTH NETWORK$14,000
JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL$13,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS LAKE TO RIVER CHAPTER$13,000
TORONTO SERVICES COMMITTEE$12,500
SMITHFIELD FRIENDS EVANGELICAL CHURCH FOOD PANTRY$12,000
A CHILDS PLACE CASA$7,500
FAMILY RECOVERY CENTER$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $15k → 19%JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $14k → 19%JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $13k → 19%JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $12k → 19%JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $11k → 19%JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $11k → 19%JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $11k → 19%JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $11k → 19%JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 18 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

$1.4M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
0%

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesCrime & LegalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    ALIVE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $158k · revenue +30%
  • OV
    OHIO VALLEY HEALTH CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $148k · revenue +218%
  • AC
    A CARING PLACE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $112k · revenue +191%

Funded once

  • CR
    CITY RESCUE MISSION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • NH
    NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE
    one grant, 2017 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coalition of Care Greater Cincinnati

Coalition of Care of Greater Cincinnati exists to mobilize churches and to inspire volunteers to care for vulnerable children and fragile families.

Youth Development
2
Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio

Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio serves and empowers people through God's love in their times of vulnerability. We do so through a full range of local services that engage the community in building solidarity.

Human Services
3
Columbus Alliance for Battered Women Inc dba Hope Harbour

Columbus alliance for battered women provides emergency shelter, security, crisis intervention, and advocacy for adult and child victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
4
Cumberland Valley Domestic Violence Services Inc

To provide shelter for victims of domestic violence

Human Services
5
Catholic Charities Counseling & Adoption Services of the Diocese of Erie Inc

Provide adoption, counseling services, and refugee assistance

6
The Childrens Advocacy Center of Cleveland County

To coordinate a collaborative, multi-disciplinary approach to child abuse cases. To provide private forensic interviews and medical exams in a child-friendly environment.

Crime & Legal
7
Life Crisis Center Inc

To improve the quality of life in our community through crisis intervention and violence prevention.

Human Services
8
Casa Viva

To promote Christian child care and foster care networks in developing nations

International
9
Auglaize County Crisis Center

Prevent domestic violence in auglaize co. ohio

Human Services
10
Westcare Kentucky Inc

To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.

Health
11
Cleveland Rape Crisis Center

The cleveland rape crisis center is a non-profit organization which supports survivors of sexual violence, promotes healing and prevention, and advocates for social change.

Health
12
Community Shelter Board

The community shelter board is ending homelessness by creating collaborations, innovating solutions, and investing in quality programs.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jefferson County Community Action Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is A Childs Place Casa Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALIVE INC — $157,833 · OtherALIVE INCAMERICAN RED CROSS LAKE TO RIVER CHAPTER — $140,805 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS LAKE TO RIVER CHAPTEREVANGELICAL FRIENDS CHURCH EASTERN REGION — $122,952 · OtherEVANGELICAL FRIENDS CHURCH EASTERN REGIONTORONTO SERVICES COMMITTEE — $105,163 · OtherTORONTO SERVICES COMMITTEEST JOSEPH ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH WEBA OUTREACH FOOD PANTRY — $104,126 · OtherST JOSEPH ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH WEBA OUTREACH FOOD PANTRYMINGO JUNCTION SOCIAL SERVICES COMMITTEE — $56,320 · OtherMINGO JUNCTION SOCIAL SERVICES COMMITTEEYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $31,604 · Other+3 more — $17,233 · OtherOHIO VALLEY HEALTH CENTER — $147,550 · HealthOHIO VALLEY HEALTH C…FAMILY RECOVERY CENTER — $56,178 · HealthFAMILY RECOVERY CENT…COLEMAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC — $48,342 · HealthCOLEMAN PROFESSIONAL…JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC — $106,235 · Human ServicesJEFFERSON CO…FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $42,575 · Human ServicesFAMILY & COM…A CARING PLACE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER — $112,144 · Crime & LegalA CARING …Ohio Valley Youth Network — $70,075 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF BLACK DIAMOND COUNCIL INC — $9,875 · Youth DevelopmentVAGABOND MISSIONS — $7,850 · Youth DevelopmentA CHILDS PLACE CASA LTD — $44,025 · Civil Rights
Other$736,036Health$252,070Human Services$148,810Crime & Legal$112,144Youth Development$87,800Civil Rights$44,025

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALIVE INC — $157,833 over 9y, 6.9% of budgetOHIO VALLEY HEALTH CENTER — $147,550 over 9y, 13% of budgetA CARING PLACE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER — $112,144 over 9y, 15% of budgetJEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC — $106,235 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetOhio Valley Youth Network — $70,075 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetFAMILY RECOVERY CENTER — $56,178 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCOLEMAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC — $48,342 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetA CHILDS PLACE CASA LTD — $44,025 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetFAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $42,575 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $31,604 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF BLACK DIAMOND COUNCIL INC — $9,875 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVAGABOND MISSIONS — $7,850 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EAST LIVERPOOL OHIO — $7,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALIVE INC
  • Who funds OHIO VALLEY HEALTH CENTER
  • Who funds A CARING PLACE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER
  • Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds Ohio Valley Youth Network
  • Who funds FAMILY RECOVERY CENTER
  • Who funds COLEMAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC
  • Who funds A CHILDS PLACE CASA LTD
  • Who funds FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF BLACK DIAMOND COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds VAGABOND MISSIONS
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EAST LIVERPOOL OHIO
  • Who funds CITY RESCUE MISSION INC
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Esther N Simmons Charitable TrustPA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Esther N Simmons Charitable Trust · Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · John C Williams Charitable Tr 8024 · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Jefferson County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph